To: kattracks
"The real question is: Did it distract him from his job as President? I think it really didn't."The other real question is: Did it distract Clinton from his job as President? I think it really did.
4 posted on
05/12/2003 2:34:56 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
("Liberalism" is decadence. It has nothing to do with liberalism.)
To: Savage Beast
It most CERTAINLY did distract him!!! What a CROCK!! JFK was a male whore...just like his admirer Bill Clinton.
5 posted on
05/12/2003 3:14:00 AM PDT by
Claire Voyant
((visualize whirled peas))
To: Savage Beast
The other real question is: Did it distract Clinton from his job as President? I think it really did. OBL didn't have a problem with it.
12 posted on
05/12/2003 4:44:42 AM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Open the pod bay door HAL.)
To: Savage Beast
"The real question is: Did it distract him from his job as President? I think it really didn't." The other real question is: Did it distract Clinton from his job as President? I think it really did.Those statements are both correct. It didn't affect JFK's tenure bec it never became public and never became a controversy. Times had changed by the time BJ Sinkmaster was elected. Women reporters were/are as prevelant as males. The "wink, wink, boys will be boys" attitude of the almost totally male media back in the 60s was no more.
20 posted on
05/12/2003 5:07:14 AM PDT by
Lee'sGhost
(Crom!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson