Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lucifer, The First Liberal
The Wanderer ^ | March 6, 2002 | Dr. Arthur M. Hippler

Posted on 05/01/2003 12:23:02 PM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner

In his encyclical on The Nature of True Liberty (Libertas Praestantissimum), Leo XIII makes the remarkable claim that liberalism is diabolic in its origins. "But many there are who follow in the footsteps of Lucifer, and adopt as their own his rebellious cry, I will not serve; and consequently substitute for true liberty what is sheer and most foolish license. Such, for instance, are the men belonging to that widely spread and powerful organization, who, usurping the name of liberty, style themselves liberals" (Libertas Praestantissimum, n.14). Although the Holy Father’s comparison may seem hyperbolic, nonetheless the principles of liberalism mirror the Devil’s original revolt.

While many political opinions and projects are lumped together under the name of liberalism, we should remind ourselves of its most fundamental basis. As Leo XIII explains, liberalism begins with the rejection of both natural and divine law; the "followers of liberalism deny the existence of any divine authority to which obedience is due, and proclaim that every man is the law to himself; from which arises that ethical system which they style independent morality" (LP, n.15). Morality comes neither from God nor human nature.

For the liberal, morality is created by the free choice of society. Whether one studies Hobbes or Rousseau, one finds no law higher than the human law. In the words of Pope Leo, "just as every man’s individual reason is his only rule of life, so the collective reason of the community should be the supreme guide in the management of all public affairs" (ibid.). This divorce of the moral law from politics affects our understanding of democracy up to the present day, as Pope John Paul notes in Evangelium Vitae (n. 70).

This rejection of God’s rule through the moral law is the sin of Lucifer. As St. Thomas explains, the Devil rejected the law of God for a disordered form of freedom: "The end of the Devil is the aversion of the rational creature from God; hence from the beginning he has endeavored to lead man from obeying the divine precept. But aversion from God has the nature of an end, inasmuch as it is sought for under the appearance of liberty, according to Jer. 2:20: ‘Of old time thou hast broken my yoke, thou hast burst my bands, and thou saidst, I will not serve’" (IIIa, Q.8, art.7).

This rebellion was imitated by our first parents, when they decided to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of God and Evil, and "be like God." While sharing in the divine image and likeness is part of our perfection, St. Thomas teaches that man desired this divine likeness in a disordered way by eating of the forbidden fruit: "The first man sinned chiefly by coveting God’s likeness as regards knowledge of good and evil, according to the serpent’s instigation, namely that by his own natural power he might decide what was good, and what was evil for him to do" (IIaIIae, Q.163, a.2). Here is the liberal principle in its first expression: Man alone should decide good and evil apart from God.

While many understand liberalism as a freedom for certain political equality and civil rights, more fundamentally liberalism is a freedom from the moral law and the teaching authority of the Church. One cannot speak of "Catholic liberals" without contradiction, or at the very least, equivocation. Liberalism, like socialism and Communism, has been condemned by Pope after Pope in the social encyclicals. If we are tempted to minimize the evils of this error, we would do well to remind ourselves that Pope Leo XIII presents Lucifer to us as the original liberal.

+ + +

(Dr. Arthur M. Hippler is the director of the Office of Justice and Peace in the Diocese of La Crosse, Wis.)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: catholicism; catholiclist; leoxiii; liberal; liberalism; liberals; lucifer; luciferliberal; satanliberal; sin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
The author draws an accurate and provocative comparison between liberalism and Satan. I look forward to responses from the libertarians among us, who I think would support individual authority as the highest.

A quick primer on Satan's various names: Originally, he was call Halael, or "Light Bringer" in Hebrew. This is rendered as "Lucifer" in Latin. After Satan's rebellion against God, he was renamed "Satan" or "adversary". "Devil" means "liar".

1 posted on 05/01/2003 12:23:02 PM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
Calling Satan a liberal sounds like slander to me : slander of Satan, that is...
2 posted on 05/01/2003 12:26:56 PM PDT by genefromjersey (Gettin' too old to "play nice" !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
"Here is the liberal principle in its first expression: Man alone should decide good and evil apart from God. "

That pretty much sums up their position.

3 posted on 05/01/2003 12:32:12 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flying Circus
ping
4 posted on 05/01/2003 12:37:16 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
For the liberal, morality is created by the free choice of society.

The problem modern liberals face is that some choices lead to negative consequences. This fact flies in the face of their claim that all choices are morally equivalent.

They react in two ways in an effort to prop up their view.

First, they turn to government. The role of government for a liberal is to remove the negative consequences of bad choices. This is attempted with enormous sums of money and grand social engineering schemes. Unfortunately, the results have been disasterous for society.

The second thing they do is argue that people are biological machines and not free moral agents. This removes personally responsibility and justifies social engineering theory. In other words, a person is just a machine. If you find the right tool, you can fix any problem. Ultimately, you are left with a population that is dehumanized, demoralized and hopeless.

The war on poverty is a perfect example of the failure of this world view.

5 posted on 05/01/2003 12:37:58 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Forgiven_Sinner; .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; ...
WANDERER Ping
7 posted on 05/01/2003 12:43:41 PM PDT by Polycarp ("He who denies the existence of God, has some reason for wishing that God did not exist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
b ... t ... t ... t ---
8 posted on 05/01/2003 12:46:15 PM PDT by f.Christian (( The separation of state and religion means ... ideology // whacks --- NOT God ! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Thanks. LOL ;-)
9 posted on 05/01/2003 12:47:52 PM PDT by Polycarp ("He who denies the existence of God, has some reason for wishing that God did not exist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Forgiven_Sinner
You are all over the top. To claim that liberals are Satan is absurd. What is wrong with you? What is wrong with the country? There should be such a thing as dissent and it is absolutely essential to democracy. Political opinions and views are just that, they aren’t religion. By saying that liberals are Satan is to say Conservatives are God, do any of you recognize the danger of that equation? THINK. The decline of political discourse to this level is appalling. On both sides, so don’t argue that just because they do it is appropriate on this side, it is vile and pathetic for anyone to attack on this level.
11 posted on 05/01/2003 12:52:38 PM PDT by Theyknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
read later
12 posted on 05/01/2003 12:54:28 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
To libertarians, individual authority is the highest. But, unlike liberals, who define right and wrong by how things feel to them and to others at any given time (completely subjective), the libertarian (objectivist) believes that one can use his human reason to ascertain what is objectively right and wrong, using factual truths found all around us in nature. Thus, the objectivist doesn't need religion to tell him what's right or wrong, but rather strives for the full development of his mature human brain, with which he can then infallibly inform himself what is right and wrong, without anyone's help, be it religious or secular.
13 posted on 05/01/2003 12:54:43 PM PDT by Emile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
"Devil" means "liar". Since liberals are liars too, maybe we should just start calling them devils.
14 posted on 05/01/2003 12:58:06 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theyknow
What makes it wrong and appalling? Isn't it just another "opinion?" Why is your version of discourse better than Forgiven_sinner's version? Aren't you trying to impose your views on this thread?

Why not have a sense of humor about it?

15 posted on 05/01/2003 1:03:06 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theyknow
I wouldn't conclude that all liberals are Satanic; but I would also conclude that Satan was the first liberal.
16 posted on 05/01/2003 1:06:16 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
Humanism....the rally cry (hustle) of satan calling out man to join him in his self deceptive quest
He has always been the accuser and the rebel and a liar from the beginning...the father of all lies..
Liberalism is the call to rebel against God...to replace God with man as his own god...each man to be his own little god...(with satan as his guide of course)
Neat Piece...thanks
17 posted on 05/01/2003 1:06:30 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Forgiven_Sinner
You might want to keep in mind that the word "liberal" in the 19th Century resembled about equally what we would now call libertarian and what we would now call conservative.

In essence, "conservatism" then was support for a government that actively favored the rich and powerful, liberalism was support for a neutral government, and socialism was support for a government that actively favored the poor. So a 19th century attack on liberalism -- such as that of this Pope Leo 13th -- would have to be considered quite reactionary by virtually everyone today.

The usurpation in the U.S., by FDR and others around 1930, of the name "liberal" for what is really socialism, was made more tenable given that there basically aren't any longer any people who are conservative in the 19th century sense (actively favoring the rich and powerful). (True conservatism does exist in some countries: for example, I understand that in Pakistan only the poor and middle classes pay taxes; the rich landholding aristocracy pays little or none). Since the socialists slid over to using the term "liberal," and these liberal-socialists controlled the government, media and academy and could thus enforce their use of the language, 19th-century liberals had to take on the name of conservatism or libertarianism.

19 posted on 05/01/2003 1:18:24 PM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
Until Jesus comes to rewrite the Constitution, the current version should settle questions regarding individual authority. Bible reading should be encouraged, not forced. Religious activism leads to Inquisitions and witch-burnings.

Interesting that the devil was known as the "Light Bringer." Even more interesting is the literal-to-the-hour interpretation of the first pages of Genesis. And even more interesting is the use of
King James' Olde English when Bible verses are quoted. What tedium! No wonder more kids aren't reading it.

Reaping what we're sowing, by Biblical standards, the U.S. is doomed anyway.
20 posted on 05/01/2003 1:24:17 PM PDT by okiesap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson