Skip to comments.
145 of my 150 men fled, says Guard officer
The Daily Telegraph ^
| April 17, 2003
| David Blair
Posted on 04/16/2003 5:21:12 PM PDT by MadIvan
Demoralised soldiers from Iraq's Republican Guard thought Saddam Hussein was "mad" and deserted en masse before the first American tanks rolled into Baghdad, according to a colonel in the supposedly elite force.
Speaking in the shabby family quarters given to Republican Guard officers in Baghdad, Col A T Said explained how the units that Saddam relied on most never had any intention of fighting for his regime.
In the event, American forces were able to enter the capital with relative ease last week. They confounded predictions of prolonged, costly fighting.
Saddam entrusted the Republican Guard's six divisions with the most crucial strategic task of the war: defending the approaches to Baghdad. Their 50,000 soldiers and 800 tanks were drawn up in a tight circle around the city.
Col Said, 42, commanded 150 soldiers in an engineer unit attached to the Hammurabi division, charged with defending the north-western approaches.
Yet even before the fighting began, Col Said said, most Republican Guard soldiers viewed Saddam with hatred and contempt. "We would say, 'Our leader is mad, mad, mad. And he wants to cut all our throats'.
"We knew we would never fight. I thought the war would never start because it was madness."
Col Said described the cynicism of sycophantic Republican Guard generals who assured Saddam of victory during televised meetings. "They told him we would fight any power in the world. When we heard this, we couldn't believe it. But then the generals told us, 'No, no - don't worry. Just keep quiet. Stay in your positions. It won't happen'."
On March 19, only hours before the Americans launched the first cruise missile strikes, Col Said's unit was deployed to guard a bridge north of Baghdad.
But that day, before a shot had been fired, the security officer charged with ensuring the unit's loyalty to Saddam deserted - and the way was open for more to quit.
Col Said watched as his men deserted in groups of five or six every day. After heavy coalition bombing raids, the rate of desertions accelerated. Col Said said he wanted to save the lives of his teenage soldiers, and had no objection to their leaving.
"A soldier would say to me, 'Sir, excuse me, but I cannot stay here because of the bombing. I fear for my family. I'm sorry, sir.' I would say, 'Don't worry. God go with you. I will be joining you soon'."
On April 5, Col Said was ordered to withdraw into Baghdad and guard a strategic site. By this time, only five of his soldiers were still with him. The others had fled, along with his commanding officer, Gen Mahmoud al-Ani.
Without orders, and threatened by US tanks, Col Said and his remaining soldiers discarded their uniforms and went home last Tuesday. None had fired a shot in defence of Baghdad. None had died in combat.
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baghdaddefense; blair; bush; embeddedreport; fallofbaghdad; iraq; iraqideserters; iraqifreedom; iraqiofficers; republicanguard; saddam; uk; us; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
I suppose we should have had some idea of this by the creation of the "Special Republican Guard" and the "Fedayeen Saddam" - the additional layers in the military structure indicated fewer and fewer troops that were actually loyal and motivated to fight.
Regards, Ivan
1
posted on
04/16/2003 5:21:12 PM PDT
by
MadIvan
To: hoosiermama; MeekMom; Dutchgirl; Freedom'sWorthIt; Carolina; patricia; annyokie; ...
Bump!
2
posted on
04/16/2003 5:21:23 PM PDT
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
...Further evidence that the French were directly advising the Iraqi military...
To: MadIvan
I'd heard early on that all those guards were never trained for actual combat. They'd only been trained to protect Saddam and the Baath Party in case of a revolt by the Iraqi people.
That explains why none of the soldiers had proper attire, weapons or training for combat against the coalition forces. Many of our troops said they "almost felt sorry for them."
To: MadIvan
One thing that stands out to me is how small the units were. If 6 armored "divisions" had 50,000 men, that's only about 8,000 per division, whereas a U.S. division would more typically have twice as many men (unit sizes do vary). Also, a full Colonel would generally command a battalion, and that would more typically be 1,500 men than the 150 mentioned here. (Going up in unit size, a Brigadier or 1-star General, naturally, commands a Brigade, which consists of 2-4 battalions and of which there are generally 2-4 per division.)
So the Iraqi units weren't really what they were represented as, not just in terms of training and maintenance, but even in the most basic sense. So if a Colonel commanded 150 men, and they had the usual ranks below him, it sounds like a very top-heavy structure, perhaps necessitated by their rigid, centralized command structure, or by the fear of desertion, mutiny and coups d'etat.
To: MadIvan
Saddam Hussein coerced many Iraqis to be in the military. How stupid is that!?
"I generally don't favor coercing a person whom my life may depend on." -- Ethan Hunt, Mission Impossible II
6
posted on
04/16/2003 5:50:23 PM PDT
by
Zon
To: MadIvan
Mad you say!!!
7
posted on
04/16/2003 6:27:58 PM PDT
by
AgThorn
(Continue to pray for our Troops!!)
To: MadIvan
Demoralised soldiers from Iraq's Republican Guard thought Saddam Hussein was "mad"
Hussein isn't (or wasn't) "mad" in the conventional sense. He knew exactly what he was doing: Sending his own people out to die for his own selfish and arrogant pleasure.
8
posted on
04/16/2003 6:30:17 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: MadIvan
Mad?
MAD?
MAD you say?????
9
posted on
04/16/2003 6:34:16 PM PDT
by
AgThorn
(Continue to pray for our Troops!!)
To: MadIvan
A question or two about WMDs is called for. I thought
Saddam ordered the troops to use them as we crossed the "red line".
To: MadIvan
Col Said described the cynicism of sycophantic Republican Guard generals who assured Saddam of victory during televised meetings. "They told him we would fight any power in the world. When we heard this, we couldn't believe it. But then the generals told us, 'No, no - don't worry. Just keep quiet. Stay in your positions. It won't happen'." It's like fighting the Lost Boys from Peter Pan!
11
posted on
04/16/2003 6:57:52 PM PDT
by
Illbay
To: DWPittelli
Hm. Your numbers and mine don't match.
A MAJ or LTC normally commands a Battalion, and a Division has between 10,000 and 16,000, commanded by a Major General.
A full COL normally commands a Brigade.
Divisions are made up of two or three Brigades, and a Brigade has typically three Battalions.
Source: Department of the Army Pamphlet 10-1
12
posted on
04/16/2003 7:06:34 PM PDT
by
Illbay
To: Fitzcarraldo
We aren't going to know a lot of this stuff for some time, because there are lots of bad guys out there--likely most of them in Syria--and intelligence ops and SpecOps are ongoing even if the grunts are scaling back.
13
posted on
04/16/2003 7:08:06 PM PDT
by
Illbay
To: AgThorn
14
posted on
04/16/2003 7:11:23 PM PDT
by
dighton
(Amen-Corner Hatchet Team, Nasty Little Clique)
To: MadIvan
Quagmire Operational Pause Stalingrad alert.
15
posted on
04/16/2003 7:14:09 PM PDT
by
Guillermo
(Sic 'em!)
To: DWPittelli
In the first Gulf War, I argued with my family, friends and co-workers that Saddam did not have the third most powerful military in the world.
After the war, I received many apologies, as this was proven untrue.
Now, twelve years later, most of the same people were telling me that it will a war like no other, as we are going in to Baghdad this time, to meet the Elite Republican Guard.
I told them the same as in the first Gulf War, that there is no magical Republican Guard.
So far, I have received no apologies.
LOL
16
posted on
04/16/2003 7:48:41 PM PDT
by
Conservababe
(I calls it like I sees it.)
To: Bush2000
Hussein isn't (or wasn't) "mad" in the conventional sense. He knew exactly what he was doing: Sending his own people out to die for his own selfish and arrogant pleasure. You are correct, methinks. People who cannot endure the atrocities of others, in their hearts of goodness, always succumb to the idea that those who are so cruel are mad or insane.
May we always remember that perfectly rational persons can be cruel and crush your child like an ant under their heel, not because they are insane, but because they are cruel.
17
posted on
04/16/2003 7:56:14 PM PDT
by
Conservababe
(I calls it like I sees it.)
To: MadIvan
Ivan baby,
You rock! It seems more than half the posts that make me smile (or crack up)! How do you FIND these jems?
You have my undying gratitute!
18
posted on
04/16/2003 7:59:39 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Peace through Strength)
To: DWPittelli
So if a Colonel commanded 150 men, and they had the usual ranks below him, it sounds like a very top-heavy structure, perhaps necessitated by their rigid, centralized command structure, or by the fear of desertion, mutiny and coups d'etat. I do believe you hit the nail on the head.
To: Joe 6-pack
The others had fled, along with his commanding officer, Gen Mahmoud al-Ani.
The French inspired the fighting spirit in Saddam's Republic Guard in the traditional manner . .
20
posted on
04/16/2003 8:17:14 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson