Skip to comments.
Black Muslim Traitors--We have met the enemy
FrontPageMagazine.com ^
| March 25, 2003
| David Horowitz
Posted on 03/25/2003 4:33:36 AM PST by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
1
posted on
03/25/2003 4:33:36 AM PST
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
Political correctness will be our ultimate downfall if we continue down its path.
2
posted on
03/25/2003 4:36:12 AM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Sua Sponte)
To: SJackson
We need to heed this article's message.
Farrakhan has made his objectives very clear. There are Black Muslims in this country that will follow that message.
Hitler made his message abundantly clear in the twenties and thirties. "Mein Kampf" was a blueprint for every one of his programs, and he never deviated. Nobody listened, except for his Nazi cohorts. Look at the price we paid.
We need to be honest with ourselves.
To: SJackson
Hey, these murders were NOT from Islamic terrorists (whom we should kill)
but frustrated engineers. So say's the media.
The media is on the side of the terrorists.
Peter Jennings, who is always eager to defend Islamic terrorists,
gives away factoids of US weapons' limitations during battle
and the position of US forces to their enemies anytime.
HEY, PETER JENNINGS, WHAT THIS TIME DID YOU SAY
HOW MANY AMERICAN PATRIOTS HAVE YOU HURT TODAY?
4
posted on
03/25/2003 4:38:15 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us.)
To: SJackson
They deserve to be taken seriously, not for their sake, but for ours. I suspect that there was some fear that taking them seriously (i.e., giving them what they deserve in terms of police and legal treatment) would merely call more attention to them and even encourage the moderate left to become more extreme out of sympathy. But it is apparent that just ignoring them has only made them bolder, and I think it's about time to take this problem seriously.
Someone commented on another thread that Ashcroft probably has more important things to worry about right now, which is true. But we have many existing laws that cover the kind of things these people are doing, and all we need is the institutional (police and justice system) will to enforce them.
5
posted on
03/25/2003 4:40:55 AM PST
by
livius
To: SJackson
This disgusting nut needs to be executed immediately.
Give him his fair trial and get it over with..
Our Troops need to know just where we all stand.
Kill this bastard so that the next mental case will know what lies in store for him!
Every move that the US takes now is important.
This is not the time for Political BS!
6
posted on
03/25/2003 4:43:31 AM PST
by
Radix
(We are not going to pull any punches at the battle of Baghdad)
To: SJackson
Akbar's act was treason, pure and simple! He should be executed in the field, and his body left for the buzzards (after he is doused in pig fat)!
To: SJackson
Justice for traitors.
8
posted on
03/25/2003 4:53:58 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: SJackson
I firmly believe that anyone who makes public statements such as Farrakhan did, in time of war, ought to be arrested for sedition.
But I also firmly believe that guilt by association is so opposite constitutional principles that I don't even want to discuss it.
9
posted on
03/25/2003 5:00:55 AM PST
by
Illbay
(Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
To: Highest Authority; TLBSHOW
Akbar is going to be court-martialed at Fort Campbell, KY, and I suspect will eventually be executed.
What's important now is to act against those who inspired Akbar's deed, including -- I imagine -- the Wahhabi chaplains in the military.
To: Illbay
Asan Akbar attended a mosque named after one of Mohammed's black slaves, Bilal.
To: Grand Old Partisan
12
posted on
03/25/2003 5:13:18 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: aristeides
No way will he be executed. No way. He should be I agree. That is what the UCMJ calls for, but he will not be executed by our gov't. Too much of a political hot potatoe
To: Highest Authority
Why does the media call him by the muslim name. That is not the name on his birth certificate.
14
posted on
03/25/2003 5:18:11 AM PST
by
pitinkie
To: WestPoint90
Sadly I believe you are right. Probably get off on "diminished capacity" or some such rubbish.
15
posted on
03/25/2003 5:18:50 AM PST
by
ladtx
("...the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country." D. MacArthur)
To: SJackson
Louis Farakhan, traveled to Baghdad and had this to say: "The Muslim American people are praying to the almighty God to grant victory to Iraq." Can't Farkhan's US citizenship be revoked at least? Couldn't he exile in some Islamic country since his loyalties are with them?
16
posted on
03/25/2003 5:18:53 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: pitinkie
How about the complaints about not calling John Mohammed "John Mohammed"?
To: WestPoint90
It's too much of a political hot potato to allow him back into the U.S. for a media circu and trial. I shoot him right there.
To: TADSLOS
You don't have to blame PC for any defeat. History shows, from the cavemen days to the present, your house-country cannot survive with traitors inside your walls. There is a revolution taking place in the USofA. Loose in Iraq and we will loose the USofA.
19
posted on
03/25/2003 5:36:48 AM PST
by
Blake#1
To: SJackson
All the understood lines between acceptable and unacceptable "free speech" have broken down. We need to define a line between free speech and treason. That line was crossed in the 1960s, and has been ever since.
Unfortunately the only line there is has been redrawn by the politically correct. If someone shouted out to kill blacks, or homosexuals, at a public rally, every media outlet in the country would attack them and they would soon find themselves in jail. If they had called on people to kill clinton they would have found themselves in jail. But it's OK to call on people to kill Bush or our own troops, because they aren't politically correct.
Jane Fonda in Vietnam set a precedent. Bill clinton in Oxford set a precedent.
It's not yet the end of our country, but it's a very sad and dangerous situation.
20
posted on
03/25/2003 5:51:05 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson