Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When The French Beat Back Moslem Aggression: Charles Martel at Tours
Catholic Encyclopedia ^ | 2000? | Anon

Posted on 03/09/2003 11:32:40 AM PST by Pharmboy

The Battle of Tours

October 10, 732 AD marks the conclusion of the Battle of Tours, arguably one of the most decisive battles in all of history.

A Moslem army, in a crusading search for land and the end of Christianity, after the conquest of Syria, Egypt, and North Africa, began to invade Western Europe under the leadership of Abd-er Rahman, governor of Spain. Abd-er Rahman led an infantry of 60,000 to 400,000 soldiers across the Western Pyrenees and toward the Loire River, but they were met just outside the city of Tours by Charles Martel, known as the Hammer, and the Frankish Army.

Martel gathered his forces directly in the path of the oncoming Moslem army and prepared to defend themselves by using a phalanx style of combat. The invading Moslems rushed forward, relying on the slashing tactics and overwhelming number of horsemen that had brought them victories in the past. However, the French Army, composed of foot soldiers armed only with swords, shields, axes, javelins, and daggers, was well trained. Despite the effectiveness of the Moslem army in previous battles, the terrain caused them a disadvantage. Their strength lied within their cavalry, armed with large swords and lances, which along with their baggage mules, limited their mobility.

The French army displayed great ardency in withstanding the ferocious attack. It was one of the rare times in the Middle Ages when infantry held its ground against a mounted attack. The exact length of the battle is undetermined; Arab sources claim that it was a two day battle whereas Christian sources hold that the fighting clamored on for seven days. In either case, the battle ended when the French captured and killed Abd-er Rahman.

The Moslem army withdrew peacefully overnight and even though Martel expected a surprise retaliation, there was none. For the Moslems, the death of their leader caused a sharp setback and they had no choice but to retreat back across the Pyrenees, never to return again.

Not only did this prove to be an extremely decisive battle for the Christians, but the Battle of Tours is considered the high water mark of the Moslem invasion of Western Europe.

The above, from here: http://campus.northpark.edu/history/WebChron/WestEurope/Tours.html

Charles Martel ("The Hammer")

Born about 688; died at Quierzy on the Oise, 21 October, 741.

He was the natural son of Pepin of Herstal and a woman named Alpaïde or Chalpaïde. Pepin, who died in 714, had outlived his two legitimate sons, Drogon and Grimoald, and to Theodoald, a son of the latter and then only six years old, fell the burdensome inheritance of the French monarchy.

Charles, who was then twenty-six, was not excluded from the succession on account of his birth, Theodoald himself being the son of a concubine, but through the influence of Plectrude, Theodoald's grandmother, who wished the power invested in her own descendants exclusively. To prevent any opposition from Charles she had him cast into prison and, having established herself at Cologne, assumed the guardianship of her grandson. But the different nations whom the strong hand of Pepin of Herstal had held in subjections, shook off the yoke of oppression as soon as they saw that it was with a woman they had to deal.

Neustria gave the signal for revolt (715), Theodoald was beaten in the forest of Cuise and, led by Raginfrid, mayor of the palace, the enemy advanced as far as the Meuse. The Frisians flew to arms and, headed by their duke, Ratbod, destroyed the Christian mission and entered into a confederacy with the Neustrians. The Saxons came and devastated the country of the Hattuarians, and even in Austrasia there was a certain faction that chafed under the government of a woman and child.

At this juncture Charles escaped from prison and put himself at the head of the national party of Austrasia. At first he was unfortunate. He was defeated by Ratbod near Cologne in 716, and the Neustrians forced Plectrude to acknowledge as king Chilperic, the son of Childeric II, having taken this Merovingian from the seclusion of the cloister, where he lived the name of Daniel. But Charles was quick to take revenge. He surprised and conquered the Neustrians at Amblève near Malmédy (716), defeated them a second time at Vincy near Cambrai (21 March, 717), and pursued them as far as Paris. Then retracing his steps, he came to Cologne and compelled Plectrude to surrender her power and turn over to him the wealth of his father, Pepin.

In order to give his recently acquired authority a semblance of legitimacy, he proclaimed the Merovingian Clotaire IV King of Austrasia, reserving for himself the title of Mayor of the Palace.

It was about this time that Charles banished Rigobert, the Bishop of Reims, who had opposed him, appointing in his stead the warlike and unpriestly Milon, who was already Archbishop of Trier.

The ensuing years were full of strife. Eager to chastise the Saxons who had invaded Austrasia, Charles in the year 718 laid waste their country to the banks of the Weser. In 719 Ratbod died, and Charles seized Western Friesland without any great resistance on the part of the Frisians, who had taken possession of it on the death of Pepin. The Neustrians, always a menace, had joined forces with the people of Aquitaine, but Charles hacked their army to pieces at Soissons.

After this defeat they realized the necessity of surrendering, and the death of King Clotaire IV, whom Charles had placed on the throne but two years previously, facilitated reconciliation of the two great fractions of the Frankish Empire. Charles acknowledged Chilperic as head of the entire monarchy, while on their side, the Neustrians and Aquitainians endorsed the authority of Charles; but, when Chilperic died, the following year (720) Charles appointed as his successor the son of Dagobert III, Thierry IV, who was still a minor, and who occupied the throne from 720 to 737.

A second expedition against the Saxons in 720 and the definitive submission of Raginfrid, who had been left the county of Angers (724), re-established the Frankish Monarchy as it had been under Pepin of Herstal, and closed the first series of Charles Martel's struggles. The next six years were devoted almost exclusively to the confirming of the Frankish authority over the dependent Germanic tribes. In 725 and 728 Charles went into Bavaria, where the Agilolfing dukes had gradually rendered themselves independent, and re-established Frankish suzerainty. He also brought thence the Princess Suanehilde, who seems to have become his mistress.

In 730 he marched against Lantfrid, Duke of the Alemanna, whom he likewise brought into subjection, and thus Southern Germany once more became part of the Frankish Empire, as had Northern Germany during the first years of the reign. But at the extremity of the empire a dreadful storm was gathering. For several years the Moslems of Spain had been threatening Gaul. Banished thence in 721 by Duke Eudes, they had returned in 725 and penetrated as far as Burgundy, where they had destroyed Autun.

Duke Eudes, unable to resist them, at length contented himself by negotiating with them, and to Othmar, one of their chiefs, he gave the hand of his daughter But this compromising alliance brought him into disfavour with Charles, who defeated him in 731, and the death of Othmar that same year again left Eudes at the mercy of Moslem enterprise.

In 732 Abd-er-Rahman, Governor of Spain, crossed the Pyrenees at the head of an immense army, overcame Duke Eudes, and advanced as far as the Loire, pillaging and burning as he went. In October, 732, Charles met Abd-er-Rahman outside of Tours and defeated and slew him in a battle (the Battle of Poitiers) which must ever remain one of the great events in the history of the world, as upon its issue depended whether Christian Civilization should continue or Islam prevail throughout Europe.

It was this battle, it is said, that gave Charles his name, Martel (Tudites) "The Hammer", because of the merciless way in which he smote the enemy.

The remainder of Charles Martel's reign was an uninterrupted series of triumphant combats. In 733-734 he suppressed the rebellion instigated by the Frisian duke, Bobo, who was slain in battle, and definitively subdued Friesland, which finally adopted Christianity. In 735, after the death of Eudes, Charles entered Aquitaine, quelled the revolt of Hatto and Hunold, sons of the deceased duke, and left the duchy to Hunold, to be held in fief (736). He then banished the Moslems from Arles and Avignon, defeated their army on the River Berre near Narbonne, and in 739 checked an uprising in Provence, the rebels being under the leadership of Maurontus.

So great was Charles' power during the last years of his reign that he did not take the trouble to appoint a successor to King Thierry IV, who died in 737, but assumed full authority himself, governing without legal right.

About a year before Charles died, Pope Gregory III, threatened by Luitprand, King of Lombardy, asked his help. Now Charles was Luitprand's ally because the latter had promised to assist him in the late war against the Moslems of Provence, and, moreover, the Frankish king may have already suffered from the malady that was to carry him off—two reasons that are surely sufficient to account for the fact that the pope's envoys departed without gaining the object of their errand. However, it would seem that, according to the terms of a public act published by Charlemagne, Charles had, at least in principle, agreed to defend the Roman Church, and death alone must have prevented him from fulfilling this agreement.

The reign, which in the beginning was so full of bloody conflicts and later of such incessant strife, would have been an impossibility had not Charles procured means sufficient to attract and compensate his partisans. For this purpose he conceived the idea of giving them the usufruct of a great many ecclesiastical lands, and this spoliation is what is referred to as the secularization by Charles Martel. It was an expedient that could be excused without, however, being justified, and it was pardoned to a certain extent by the amnesty granted at the Council of Lestines, held under the sons of Charles Martel in 743.

It must also be remembered that the Church remained the legal owner of the lands thus alienated. This spoliation and the conferring of the principal ecclesiastical dignities upon those who were either totally unworthy or else had naught but their military qualifications to recommend them—as, for instance, the assignment of the episcopal Sees of Reims of Reims and Trier to Milon—were not calculated to endear Charles Martel to the clergy of his time. Therefore, in the ninth century Hincmar of Reims related the story of the vision with which St. Eucher was said to have been favoured and which showed Charles in hell, to which he had been condemned for robbing the Church of its property.

But notwithstanding the almost exclusively warlike character of his reign, Charles Martel was not indifferent to the superior interests of civilization and Christianity. Like Napoleon after the French Revolution, upon emerging from the years 715-719, Charles, who had not only tolerated but perpetrated many an act of violence against the Church, set about the establishment of social order and endeavoured to restore the rights of the Catholic hierarchy. This explains the protection which in 723 he accorded St. Boniface (Winfrid), the great apostle of Germany, a protection all the more salutary as the saint himself explained to his old friend, Daniel of Winchester, that without it he could neither administer his church, defend his clergy, nor prevent idolatry. Hence Charles Martel shares, to a certain degree, the glory and merit of Boniface's great work of civilization.

He died after having divided the Frankish Empire, as a patrimony between his two sons, Carloman and Pepin.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 732; arabaggression; battle; caliphate; charlesmartel; christendom; christian; churchhistory; clashofcivilizatio; crusade; defense; france; franks; gaul; history; islam; islamism; martel; moslem; tours; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
The past Glory of Gaul. I thought this might be appropriate for a Sunday afternoon for those unaquainted with this bit of important Western history.
1 posted on 03/09/2003 11:32:40 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Hmmmm. I may take back one or two of the things I have said about the French. :)
2 posted on 03/09/2003 11:39:17 AM PST by LibKill (VIOLENCE! The supreme authority from which all other authority is derived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
This should be Mel Gibson's next movie.
3 posted on 03/09/2003 11:41:38 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Great post! Little is known in this country of this crucial time in world history. I'm just recently becoming acquainted with it myself. Paul Fregosi's book Jihad also does a great job of describing this campaign. Fregosi is of the belief that, if not for Charles the Hammer, we would all be bowing to Mecca today. I definitely have a great respect for the legacy of heroism that the French have, too bad their leadership has not lived up to it lately.
4 posted on 03/09/2003 11:42:21 AM PST by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
In 732, at the Battle of Tours,
Charles Martel defeated the Moors.

ML/NJ

5 posted on 03/09/2003 11:44:08 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
This should be Mel Gibson's next movie.

It rocks.

"Mel Gibson as THE HAMMER."

6 posted on 03/09/2003 11:45:12 AM PST by LibKill (VIOLENCE! The supreme authority from which all other authority is derived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

7 posted on 03/09/2003 11:48:50 AM PST by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc
I will have to go back and read the book "Jihad". Bernard Lewis, in one of his books, makes mention that from the Arab or Moselm point of view this was merely the defeat of a reconnaissance in force. Professor Lewis points out that the Arabs or Moslems of those times were quite honest in reporting their defeats at the hands of Christians. Professor Lewis cites to a reported defeat at Constantinople. I have a hard time imagining an Arab or Moslem army of 600,000 in those times. The supply train would have been enormous.
8 posted on 03/09/2003 11:59:45 AM PST by johndpringle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johndpringle


Charles Martel at Tours
9 posted on 03/09/2003 12:15:09 PM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
The Ghost of Martel must be weeping since 1940...
10 posted on 03/09/2003 12:50:09 PM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: johndpringle
I have a hard time imagining an Arab or Moslem army of 600,000 in those times. The supply train would have been enormous.

So do I, esp. in the Dark Ages. However, the retelling of the pertinent facts of this part of history is germaine to current events, To wit: That Muslim Arabs invaded Christian Europe 300 years before the First Crusade is not irrelevant in the discussion of Arab and American relations today.

Quite "Frankly", I hope Bush can eventually walk away, victorious from this conflict, with "George the Nail Gun" as a sobriquet.

11 posted on 03/09/2003 12:52:34 PM PST by elbucko (Blued Steel & Polished Walnut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: johndpringle
The Moslems conquered Spain with an army smaller than the one Charles Martel defeated in France.
12 posted on 03/09/2003 1:00:46 PM PST by Grand Old Partisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Grand Old Partisan
Do you know anything about Spainish Muslims today?
14 posted on 03/09/2003 1:26:55 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

1683 - POLAND Saved Europe from Islamic JIHAD

Before they were utterly defeated by the King of Poland, Jan III Sobieski, at the Battle of Vienna in 1683, those followers of Muhammad, the Turks, had laid seige to Vienna, in their attempt to "convert" and conquer Europe.

Here was their declaration and widely published prayer (sound familiar?):

Eternal God and creator of all things, and thou O Mahomet his sacred and divine prophet. We beseech thee let us not dread the Christians, who are so mean and silly to rely on a crucified god. By the power of thy right hand, so strengthen ours that we may surround this foolish people, on every side, and utterly destroy them. At length fulfill our prayers and put these miscreants into our hands, that we may establish thy throne for ever in Mecca, and sacrifice all those enemies of our most holy religion at thy tomb. Blow us with thy mighty breath like swarms of flies into their quarters, and let the eyes of these infidels bedazelled with the lustre of our moon. Consume them with thy fiery darts, and blind them with the dust which they themselves have raised. Destroy them all in thine anger. Break all their bones in pieces, and consume the flesh and blood of those who defile thy sacrifice, and hang the sacred light of circumcision on their cross. Wash them with showers of many waters, who are so stupid to worship gods they know not: and make their Christ a son to that God who ne're begot him. Hasten therefore their destruction we humbly entreat thee, and blot out their name and religion, which they glory so much in, from off the face of the earth, that they may be no more, who condemn and mock at thy law. Amen.

And, here is an excerpt from the King of Poland's letter to his Queen, after the Battle:

.....The Rarities which were found in the Prime Vizor's Tent, were no less Numerous than Strange and Surprising, as very curious Parrots, and some Birds of Paradise, with all his Banios, and Fountains, and some Ostriches, which he Chose rather to Kill, than let 'em fall Alive into our Hands; Nay his Dispair and Jealousy transported him so far, as to Destroy his very Women for the same Reason.

The whole Army Attributes the Glory of this Victory to God, and Us, and all the Princes of the Empire, with the Great Officers, as the Dukes of Bavaria and Lorrain, Prince Waldek, etc. were so far transported with my Valour and Success, that their Thanks and Praises were more Numerous, than was their Fears before; and Count Staremberg the Governour, Saluted me with the Title of his Mighty Deliverer. The Common People in my going to and from the Churches, pay'd their Veneration even to my very Garments, and made their Cry's and Acclamations reach the Sky, of Long Live the King of Poland.....

In the battle we Lost some of our Friends, as Prince Halicki, and the Treasurer of our Household. The Reverend Marinus Daviano, heapt on me his Pray'rs and Blessings, and told me he saw a White Dove fluttering o're the Army, which he look'd upon as an happy Augure of our Victory.....

Thanks be to Heaven, now the Half-Moon Triumphs no longer o'er the Cross, And 'twas thrown down from St. Stephen's Steeple in Vienna (whom it had o'retopt so long) immediately on the Defeat: Neither have the Turks any occasion to upbraid us with their Blasphemous Mahometan Proverb: Ye Christians where is Your God?


After the Battle Jan Sobieski entered Vienna in glory. The King and his Polish army had won lots of fame after their victory. Jan III Sobieski was not only looked upon as the savior of Vienna, but as a savior of the whole of Europe from the Ottoman Turks.


15 posted on 03/09/2003 1:58:36 PM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Thank you for posting. And the Poles support us today...
16 posted on 03/09/2003 2:05:41 PM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: matcrazy; Mercuria
ping.
17 posted on 03/09/2003 2:21:48 PM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"George the Nail Gun"

that is very deserving of ROFLMBO!!!

18 posted on 03/09/2003 2:22:41 PM PST by Blue Scourge (If a man hasn't found something he is willing to die for, he is not fit to live. - MLKjr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
In 732 A.D. the Franks were not yet the French. The Franks were more Germanic and less Latin. ONly in time did they degenerate into the wine-sipping, cheese-eating surrender monkies they are today.
19 posted on 03/09/2003 2:44:14 PM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Clash of Civilizatio
Indexing.
20 posted on 03/09/2003 2:53:06 PM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson