Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Schoolkids to Be Asked to Consider Oral Sex
Reuters ^ | 2/21/03 | Matthew Jones

Posted on 02/21/2003 11:33:07 AM PST by Calpernia

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Calpernia
I do hope they also tell the children to seek out cocaine dealers as their drug resource of choice. This would be a good thing to teach children, because Cocaine is a "stopping point" which can prevent drug abusers from proceeding on to that far more dangerous drug, heroin.
21 posted on 02/21/2003 11:50:26 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Calpernia
"Family groups argue that oral sex is likely to lead to penetrative sex."

If it doesn't, you're not doing it right.

23 posted on 02/21/2003 12:09:03 PM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
"Naughty, wicked, evil Zoot..."
24 posted on 02/21/2003 12:11:48 PM PST by Redcloak (And now for something completely different...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mg39
What? Clinton is responsible for all of it. Ken Starr just got stuck with the dirty job of proving the King was a felonious slut.
25 posted on 02/21/2003 12:14:02 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Way back in the 50's during high school 'coping' a feel was considered hot stuff. My, how things have changed.
26 posted on 02/21/2003 12:16:14 PM PST by duckman (all ducked up with no place to go..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
"British Schoolkids to Be Asked to Consider Oral Sex"

On a related note:

Micheal Jackson and Ted Kennedy have announced that they will be soon moving to Great Britan.
27 posted on 02/21/2003 12:18:08 PM PST by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mg39
Getting blow jobs from a very junior employee in the workplace is NOT a Presidents "personal life". Lying about it under oath is a crime.
28 posted on 02/21/2003 12:23:02 PM PST by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: al baby
Did Clinton make it public or pubic ??

Inquiring minds want to know.

29 posted on 02/21/2003 12:33:16 PM PST by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
And people trying to eat less should hang out in kitchens and just breath deeply so they aren't so hungry.
30 posted on 02/21/2003 12:55:45 PM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I think that in today's SexEd curriculum Second Base IS Oral Sex. First Base is French Kissing naked with your hands in each others pants. Third Base is doing both at the same time, in your school classroom.
31 posted on 02/21/2003 1:00:41 PM PST by RobFromGa (It's Time to Bomb Saddam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Dem Brits coudda done sumpin good; but dey blew it!
32 posted on 02/21/2003 1:07:39 PM PST by Henchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Does anybody else recall that episode of the "X-Files" that portrayed a hideously imbred, genetically deficient family known as "The Peacocks"? Mother didn't have any legs (or teeth) and slept under the bed on an auto-mechanic's rollaround.

That's what comes to mind when I think of what's left of Britian.

33 posted on 02/21/2003 1:19:14 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
LOL
34 posted on 02/21/2003 1:30:01 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 6, Staterooms As Low As $610 Per Person For Entire Week!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mg39
There were many reasons to disagree with Clinton's policy's, but his personal life was his own damn business, and Starr and Company should NEVER have investigated that stuff.

well it's obivious you know nothing about the issue
35 posted on 02/21/2003 1:31:47 PM PST by uncbob ( building tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
You say I need a good history lesson. Trust me, I'm well informed (I had the benefit of not being home-schooled, for starters). I remain disgusted at Clinton's betrayal of his marriage vows and use of the Oval Office as his personal back seat. However, history lessons of the future will not look kindly upon Mr. Starr's jihad against Clinton's sex life.
36 posted on 02/21/2003 1:59:16 PM PST by mg39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mg39
However, history lessons of the future will not look kindly upon Mr. Starr's jihad against Clinton's sex life.

If this is your complete summary of what actually was at stake, then it would have been better for you to be homeschooled.

President Clinton signed a law stating that an accused sexual harrasser's private sex life was legitimately part of the evidence that could be presented in court.

Clinton was accused of sexually harrassing Paula Jones. He then lied under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky.

There are people serving prison sentences for doing exactly that. Clinton is running around free. The injustice should be obvious.

37 posted on 02/21/2003 3:22:17 PM PST by ExpandNATO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
"We trust head teachers and teachers to make sensible decisions about sex education."

Head teachers??? Hmmmm.....

38 posted on 02/21/2003 3:30:17 PM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mg39
In addition to needing a good history lesson, rather than your revisionist theory, you're quite ignorant about home education.

Support your theory of Starr, rather than tossing out accusations.

39 posted on 02/21/2003 3:57:00 PM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mg39
However, history lessons of the future will not look kindly upon Mr. Starr's jihad against Clinton's sex life.

Wow! You swallowed the leftist lies, hook, line and sinker, didn't you? (You believe Susan MacDougal??)

The so-called "jihad against Clinton's sex life" was NEVER about his sex life alone.....it was about his lack of character, honesty, his illegal business dealings, and lies to a grand jury. His debauchery was merely a symptom of his deceitful, illicit lifestyle.

History lessons of the future will not look kindly on the x42.

40 posted on 02/21/2003 4:11:14 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush......Leadership, Morality, Integrity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson