[mg39]

You say I need a good history lesson. Trust me, I'm well informed (I had the benefit of not being home-schooled, for starters). I remain disgusted at Clinton's betrayal of his marriage vows and use of the Oval Office as his personal back seat. However, history lessons of the future will not look kindly upon Mr. Starr's jihad against Clinton's sex life.

[ExpandNATO]

However, history lessons of the future will not look kindly upon Mr. Starr's jihad against Clinton's sex life.

If this is your complete summary of what actually was at stake, then it would have been better for you to be homeschooled.

President Clinton signed a law stating that an accused sexual harrasser's private sex life was legitimately part of the evidence that could be presented in court.

Clinton was accused of sexually harrassing Paula Jones. He then lied under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky.

There are people serving prison sentences for doing exactly that. Clinton is running around free. The injustice should be obvious.

[homeschool mama]

In addition to needing a good history lesson, rather than your revisionist theory, you're quite ignorant about home education.

Support your theory of Starr, rather than tossing out accusations.

[ohioWfan]

However, history lessons of the future will not look kindly upon Mr. Starr's jihad against Clinton's sex life.

Wow! You swallowed the leftist lies, hook, line and sinker, didn't you? (You believe Susan MacDougal??)

The so-called "jihad against Clinton's sex life" was NEVER about his sex life alone.....it was about his lack of character, honesty, his illegal business dealings, and lies to a grand jury. His debauchery was merely a symptom of his deceitful, illicit lifestyle.

History lessons of the future will not look kindly on the x42.