ZOT!!!! (Today's Zot Threat Level Is Red)

Unknown News | 2/16/2003

[pookiesdame]

Today's Zot Threat Level Is Red

---

Click the picture

[pookiesdame]

Five years ago i would've thought this was impossible in America. Now it's so routine it's not even news?

[stalin]

I think that they were there to protect the crowds.

I'm sure they didn't need protection. That should be the last place the terrorists would want to strike.

[sinkspur]

Five years ago i would've thought this was impossible in America. Now it's so routine it's not even news?

It's been routine for years. SWAT has snipers.

What's your problem? Angry groups of socialists deserve to be monitored like rabid dogs.

[TLBSHOW]

Angry groups of socialists deserve to be monitored like rabid dogs.

Quote of the day!

[wimpycat]

Ummmmm....could it be that sharp shooters are providing security in case of a terrorist sniper? Oh, no, that would make no sense at all. It MUST be that police "snipers" are going to pick off people in the crowd who don't goose-step. Yeah, that's it....that's the logical conclusion...

[Drango]

and the media covers it up.

????? The article points out it was in the NY Times. Just how is the media covering it up?

[dighton]

OK, I looked at the stupid site. Enjoy your brief stay here.

[eddie willers]

Five years ago i would've thought this was impossible in America.

Did you get the tag number of that turnip truck you just fell off?

[LiberalBuster]

>>What's your problem? Angry groups of socialists deserve
>>to be monitored like rabid dogs.

Just substitute "Jew" for "socialist," and you sound just like a Nazi.

People allegedly for limited government praising police State tactics. How Orwellian is that?

[RoughDobermann]

Five years ago i would've thought this was impossible in America.

Counter-sniper teams watching over crowds (particularly political gatherings) have been around for a LOT longer than than five years...

[Catspaw]

The last place the terrorists would strike? Did you ever think that the terrorists would hit two commercial buildings in New York City on a Tuesday morning?

ANY large crowd is a target. It doesn't make any difference what their ideology is.

[Mo1]

If you haven't heard .. we are at Code Orange

[RoughDobermann]

ANY large crowd is a target. It doesn't make any difference what their ideology is.

Must disagree with you here. As Lenin said, these people are useful idiots, unwittingly (or perhaps not) supporting our enemies. Look at how thrilled Iraq is over all these love-ins...

[LurkedLongEnough]

We can't have the protesters realize that carrying firearms themselves would be a good idea, now, can we?

[Catspaw]

True--but al Qaeda goes for body count, the more the better.

[cake_crumb]

Crowds make great targets for terrorism, as well as great cover for terrorists. In addition, some of them always get violent. This IS routine.

I'm surprised at your ignorance. Once you're around here awhile, maybe it can be cured.

[syriacus]

I can easily imagine a leftist in the crowd causing mayhem, and then blaming the right.

By the way, was any ecstasy handed out to the mosh-pit crowds of protesters?

[SevenDaysInMay]

And FBI's hitman Lon Horiuchi dreams of Vicky Weaver, an easy, celebrated, trophy kill at Ruby Ridge, protected by infamous federal power. Lon and his handlers face their Judgement Day.

Our FLEO snipers must retain honor proudly thrown away at Ruby Ridge and Waco, or we will have an attritious Constitutional crisis as never before through out this multi-generational Pan-Islamic terror war against American Civlization.

[Cultural Jihad]

What's your problem? Angry groups of socialists deserve to be monitored like rabid dogs.

Well said. They should consider themselves fortunate. If they were in Iraq protesting against the Arab-nationalist Ba'ath Socialist Party they and all their families (including toddlers) would be thrown into hellish prisons to be tortured.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Leave it to you to ruin a perfectly good opportunity for a round of group hysteria.