Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Focus is on photographer with an eye for cheerleaders
Omaha.com ^ | 02.06.03

Posted on 02/13/2003 6:50:23 PM PST by Coleus

Focus is on photographer with an eye for cheerleaders

BY STU POSPISIL

LINCOLN - Metro Conference athletic directors and the Nebraska School Activities Association will be watching their high school basketball sidelines more closely after Omaha police detained a 74-year-old man for training a camera on high school cheerleaders.

Omaha Marian Athletic Director Jim Miller said Wednesday that cheerleaders from his school became uncomfortable because of the man's apparent picture-taking at a Jan. 30 girls basketball game at Omaha South.

Miller said the girls alerted Marian's dean of students, who told South administrators. School officials called police, who interviewed the man. The man told authorities that he was a fan of Omaha Marian and Omaha Creighton Prep and was just there to observe the game.

Sgt. Dan Cisar said police took an information report, and the man was ordered to leave the building.

The girls later told Miller they had seen the man at other games.

The man could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

School officials have expressed concerns to the NSAA that if photographs of cheerleaders were taken, they could end up being sold to a Web site that contains pornographic or offensive material.

Copies of a photograph of the man, taken from South's video security monitoring system, were distributed this week at the Metro Conference's monthly meeting of athletic directors.

The man's photo also was sent to the NSAA because of its state basketball tournaments at various sites in Lincoln next month. The girls state tournament is March 6 through 8, and the boys tournament is March 13 through 15.

NSAA Assistant Director Jim Angele said copies of the photo have been forwarded to floor managers at the tournament sites in Lincoln.

"We hope this person won't show up at the state tournament," Angele said. "We'll have to police our sidelines more to make sure only those with credentials are there."

The NSAA does not have a uniform policy regarding the management of spectators at sporting events, other than to ask for good sportsmanship. The obligation to police spectators is left up to individual schools. That means school administrators can decide whether to prohibit admission to a particular spectator. It is common at events such as high school basketball games to see numerous school staff in attendance for the sole purpose of monitoring the crowd.

Miller said amateur photographers, such as family members, may be asked to provide identification if not recognized by officials of the host school.

"We're telling our workers that if they don't know somebody taking photographs, they may want to check it out," Miller said. "It's not a good situation for someone to be going to games and taking photos of cheerleaders only. It sends up a red flag."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: cheerleaders; chesterthemolester; corn; girls; highschool; lincoln; ne; nebraska; omaha; photography; photos; pictures; school; shortskirts; spectator; sports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last
To: Coleus

All those guys with cameras? Get their film too!

I'll make sure it never sees the light of day again!

41 posted on 02/13/2003 7:42:58 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Copies of a photograph of the man, taken from South's video security monitoring system, were distributed this week at the Metro Conference's monthly meeting of athletic directors.

So they are passing around photos of the man and implying he is a pervert.

Theyr'e getting awfully close to a lible action.

42 posted on 02/13/2003 7:44:47 PM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
(is it just me, or is no one taking a picture of the guy?)
43 posted on 02/13/2003 7:44:50 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
What guy?
44 posted on 02/13/2003 7:46:32 PM PST by GhostofWCooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
There are a lot of sickos out there. I don't blame these parents and grandparents for wanting to protect their girls.

I don't blame them either. But that has nothing to do with what the government can and cannot legally do about people taking legal pictures at a public event. Just because you wish something does not mean that the government has the authority to do your bidding.
45 posted on 02/13/2003 7:47:34 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
That is really pathetic.

I don't know what's worse, the fact that some idiot is doing this, or the fact that some idiot is trying to make this idiot's actions illegal.

dumb and dumber
46 posted on 02/13/2003 7:47:53 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
There are adult websites that cater to cheerleader fetishists. In fact some men will sit there and try to snap pics of them while they're kicking in effect getting crotch shots.

Yes there are. And if this person posts derogatory photos of people without permission in a scandalous manner on one of them THEN there might be some recourse in the judicial system.

But we don't have pre-cogs or a bureau of pre-crime as much as some people may want them.
47 posted on 02/13/2003 7:50:54 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GhostofWCooper
The one doing the Grande Jette.
48 posted on 02/13/2003 7:51:44 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I winced when I looked at that guy. That had to SMART...
49 posted on 02/13/2003 7:53:54 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
If the good people of Lincoln considered his behavior disruptive then they have every right to escort him to the door.
50 posted on 02/13/2003 7:55:51 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: plain talk; yarddog
For common sense you might look at yarddogs post in #19 on thread. About the most sensible post on the thread.
51 posted on 02/13/2003 7:56:50 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
My bad, that wasn't a Grande Jeté at all, that was an Arabesque.


52 posted on 02/13/2003 7:58:06 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
(wince)
53 posted on 02/13/2003 7:59:54 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
If the good people of Lincoln considered his behavior disruptive then they have every right to escort him to the door.

Actually not. Their government does not have the authority to decide that just anything and everything it wants is disruptive. I realize you don't like that, but its the truth. Government is bound by chains of law in this country. The good people of Lincoln could be very surprised in the pocketbook if someone ever takes them to court for tossing them out of a public event just for taking photographs.
54 posted on 02/13/2003 8:03:04 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; Jim Robinson; nopardons; ladyinred; Howlin; Poohbah; Roscoe; Boot Hill; CWOJackson; ...

Excuse me ??

55 posted on 02/13/2003 8:06:28 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: t1b8zs
From Cheech & Chong's first album.

I bought some Firesign Theater last year...so good to hear that old stuff again...)

56 posted on 02/13/2003 8:06:48 PM PST by jwfiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Lighten up, Francis.
57 posted on 02/13/2003 8:08:07 PM PST by Howlin (It's yet ANOTHER good day to be a Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Hardly. Just your basic legalistic thinking with a dose of contrarian thrown in for good measure. If you had a 17 year old daughter you might understand (or you might not I suppose by today's standards). By that reasoning it's OK for Michael Jackson to sleep with little boys, right? He hasn't broke a law, has he? This is the legalistic dumming down of America that scares me. Rules-based, no common sense.
58 posted on 02/13/2003 8:09:12 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Looks like there going to have to empty the entire stands
at every Anna Kournikova match. You can be sure there's
alot of butch women in there too.
59 posted on 02/13/2003 8:17:37 PM PST by T. Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
If they know how old he is and have his photograph and are offended or distressed about whatever he is doing, has it occurred to them to ask him to stop it. Maybe he would.
60 posted on 02/13/2003 8:19:35 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson