Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Focus is on photographer with an eye for cheerleaders
Omaha.com ^ | 02.06.03

Posted on 02/13/2003 6:50:23 PM PST by Coleus

Focus is on photographer with an eye for cheerleaders

BY STU POSPISIL

LINCOLN - Metro Conference athletic directors and the Nebraska School Activities Association will be watching their high school basketball sidelines more closely after Omaha police detained a 74-year-old man for training a camera on high school cheerleaders.

Omaha Marian Athletic Director Jim Miller said Wednesday that cheerleaders from his school became uncomfortable because of the man's apparent picture-taking at a Jan. 30 girls basketball game at Omaha South.

Miller said the girls alerted Marian's dean of students, who told South administrators. School officials called police, who interviewed the man. The man told authorities that he was a fan of Omaha Marian and Omaha Creighton Prep and was just there to observe the game.

Sgt. Dan Cisar said police took an information report, and the man was ordered to leave the building.

The girls later told Miller they had seen the man at other games.

The man could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

School officials have expressed concerns to the NSAA that if photographs of cheerleaders were taken, they could end up being sold to a Web site that contains pornographic or offensive material.

Copies of a photograph of the man, taken from South's video security monitoring system, were distributed this week at the Metro Conference's monthly meeting of athletic directors.

The man's photo also was sent to the NSAA because of its state basketball tournaments at various sites in Lincoln next month. The girls state tournament is March 6 through 8, and the boys tournament is March 13 through 15.

NSAA Assistant Director Jim Angele said copies of the photo have been forwarded to floor managers at the tournament sites in Lincoln.

"We hope this person won't show up at the state tournament," Angele said. "We'll have to police our sidelines more to make sure only those with credentials are there."

The NSAA does not have a uniform policy regarding the management of spectators at sporting events, other than to ask for good sportsmanship. The obligation to police spectators is left up to individual schools. That means school administrators can decide whether to prohibit admission to a particular spectator. It is common at events such as high school basketball games to see numerous school staff in attendance for the sole purpose of monitoring the crowd.

Miller said amateur photographers, such as family members, may be asked to provide identification if not recognized by officials of the host school.

"We're telling our workers that if they don't know somebody taking photographs, they may want to check it out," Miller said. "It's not a good situation for someone to be going to games and taking photos of cheerleaders only. It sends up a red flag."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: cheerleaders; chesterthemolester; corn; girls; highschool; lincoln; ne; nebraska; omaha; photography; photos; pictures; school; shortskirts; spectator; sports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2003 6:50:23 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus
America has gone insane....
2 posted on 02/13/2003 6:53:46 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
what law does this "violate?"

Just curious...
3 posted on 02/13/2003 6:56:31 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 (clintonsgotusbytheballs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
was he an arab or something?

did he threaten someone?
4 posted on 02/13/2003 6:59:21 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 (clintonsgotusbytheballs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Yes it has. And your screen name perfectly fits!

If cheerleaders get upset with guys watching them or snapping their pictures, perhaps they should take to wearing burkas.

5 posted on 02/13/2003 6:59:39 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Sounds like Clinton's in town.
6 posted on 02/13/2003 7:00:20 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
BALIF,"WACK OFF HIS PEEPEE"
7 posted on 02/13/2003 7:00:21 PM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
This is the kind of behavior that led to the phrase "dirty old man".
8 posted on 02/13/2003 7:00:54 PM PST by not-an-ostrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t1b8zs
"I plead insanity...I'm just crazy about that stuff."
9 posted on 02/13/2003 7:02:15 PM PST by jwfiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe; Kevin Curry

... thanks in large part to the moral-liberal industries making a profit off of licentiousness and perversion. If the people of a community don't want dirty old men paying too much improper attention to their minor daughters (or sons) then they have a right to discourage their actions.

In a sane America (pre-ACLU, pre-Woodstock, pre-LP and pre-MTV) this elderly man would have been given the bum's rush to the nearest trainyard for a one-way ride out of town.

10 posted on 02/13/2003 7:02:28 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jwfiv
WAS THAT OLD FIRE SIGN STUFF? I CANT RECALL IT JUST POPPED IN MY MIND AND YOUR POST REINFORCED IT
11 posted on 02/13/2003 7:03:48 PM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Nothing's sacred anymore. You can't be a Dirty Old Man, now, and I've just reached retirement age!
12 posted on 02/13/2003 7:08:00 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

13 posted on 02/13/2003 7:10:46 PM PST by KansasCanadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

14 posted on 02/13/2003 7:10:47 PM PST by KansasCanadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t1b8zs
Cheech and Chong
15 posted on 02/13/2003 7:10:50 PM PST by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KansasCanadian
Seeing double, anyone?
16 posted on 02/13/2003 7:11:26 PM PST by KansasCanadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
This is stupid. I have noticed (in channel surfing) ESPN broadcasts of cheerleading competitions.. The stage was teeming with young ladies jumping, dancing and generally 'shakin their booties' for a fairly large TV audience.

I guess the old 'pervert' isn't alone...
The cheerleaders all wear the flashy plastic smile, to go along with their skimpy outfits.
The 'dirty old man' committed the crime of looking at pretty, vivacious girls while being old.
It's bulls--t.

17 posted on 02/13/2003 7:11:41 PM PST by GhostofWCooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
If the people of a community don't want dirty old men paying too much improper attention to their minor daughters (or sons) then they have a right to discourage their actions.

I fail to see how taking photographs at a public event can be restricted by the government.

I doubt that either the government, or the people, would have much of a legal case to prevent someone from taking a photograph of something at a public event that it is not illegal to look at with their own two eyes, or that would not raise an eyebrow if viewed on the 10 o'clock sportscast.

If the man does something illegal with the photographs or sells them for profit without permission in a manner likely to cause harm then they have a case. But the government cannot prosecute someone or prohibit them from doing something that is legal because of what they think he or she is thinking.

I'm surprised someone would actually want the government to be able to do that.
18 posted on 02/13/2003 7:14:27 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
There is a basic conflict here.

How can his photographs contain different material than is being displayed openly to everyone. If there is something which he should not photograph then it should not be shown.

19 posted on 02/13/2003 7:17:39 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Just to put things in context...


20 posted on 02/13/2003 7:19:27 PM PST by Mensch (I'm not really a Mensch, I just play one on the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson