Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus
what law does this "violate?"

Just curious...
3 posted on 02/13/2003 6:56:31 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 (clintonsgotusbytheballs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Robert_Paulson2
BALIF,"WACK OFF HIS PEEPEE"
7 posted on 02/13/2003 7:00:21 PM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Robert_Paulson2
what law does this "violate?"

Well there must be more to this story .. if not, I don't see any laws that were violated

64 posted on 02/13/2003 8:27:48 PM PST by Mo1 (I HATE The Party of Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Who knows, I guess it's akin to the hate crime laws. It's what the authorities perceive what you think even though no crime was committed and nobody was hurt. In this case, it's a dirty old man (their perception) taking pictures of fully-clothed girls in a public area--so, by mere thoughts you throw out the 4th and 5th amendment out the window because a parent complained.
81 posted on 02/13/2003 9:12:34 PM PST by Coleus (RU 486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Robert_Paulson2
No ogling the cheerleaders!
94 posted on 02/13/2003 9:27:20 PM PST by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Robert_Paulson2
what law does this "violate?"

What law does it need to violate?

Here's a hypothetical for you:

Do you think that in taking photographs of the cheerleaders (creating a marketable product) and posting or selling them to a shady website for profit or pleasure, that this 74 year old man should at some point get the permission of the subjects or perhaps get a signed release?

Even if that was not his intent, it's time to stop playing stupid here. What purpose did he have in mind for these photographs? It is part of the job of the school staff to protect these children. And that's what they are...children.
This guy wasn't at a Laker's game taking pics of the Laker's Girls. And if he was, how long do you think the LA Forum Security would put up with that?

It's time to stop protecting these pervs under the guise of Civil Liberties.

161 posted on 02/14/2003 6:55:25 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Robert_Paulson2
what law does this "violate?"

Technically, probably none, other than the Law of common sense.

Of course, if he chooses to snap opportunistic pictures of young girls in compromising positions and post 'em on the web,
than I can't blame said young girls father if he takes the guys camera and smashes it to pieces on the bridge of this perverts nose.

There's a reason this culture is spinning around the drain, and it stems from exactly the kind of legalistic permissiveness that you've suggested.

167 posted on 02/14/2003 7:03:23 AM PST by MassExodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Robert_Paulson2; Lunatic Fringe
what law does this "violate?"

Thee are plenty of things that are OK in moderation, but if carried to the extreme can cross the line.

197 posted on 02/14/2003 11:15:50 AM PST by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson