Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/28/2003 2:52:21 PM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: yankeedame
Gee, someone quick, get their weasley names.
2 posted on 01/28/2003 2:53:38 PM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
CHICAGO, Jan. 23 (AScribe Newswire) -- At the 117th Annual Meeting of the American Historical Association in January, historians from more than forty colleges and universities agreed to form a new national network, "Historians Against the War."

"HAW"? The only appropriate response seems to be, "HAW HAW HAW!"

3 posted on 01/28/2003 2:54:25 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
HAW!

How Appropriate, Wot?

4 posted on 01/28/2003 2:54:28 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
And people wonder what is happening to their children.
5 posted on 01/28/2003 2:55:23 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
Let me guess, our tax dollars pay their wages.

I suppose that's okay if they spend their own money in the furthence of this cause. Otherwise they should be canned in mass.

6 posted on 01/28/2003 2:56:09 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
Be still my trembling heart. 1000 historians, wow.
Lets have a little test. "Attention, all you 1000
historians, who likes Hillary?"
7 posted on 01/28/2003 2:57:33 PM PST by Hans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
Long-time activists, people who have done little for decades, and many others who have never been involved can be found among the signers."

Including studying history, obviously.

10 posted on 01/28/2003 2:59:29 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
Right after 9/11 I said cleaning America's enemies out of Afghanistan would be far easier than cleaning them out of academia.
11 posted on 01/28/2003 2:59:32 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
WHAT A JOKE!!

IF ANYONE KNOWS WHY WAR IS NECESSARY, IT IS AN HISTORIAN.

15 posted on 01/28/2003 3:04:39 PM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
Do you have a specific link (url) to this news article, not just the general web site url?
16 posted on 01/28/2003 3:05:18 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
I have had suspicions up to now, but this confirms it.
History has gone the route of "news reporting".

Two generations of touchy-feely types masquerading as serious researchers and compilers had me fooled.
Is there any way to tell these fools we don't care what they think?

Report the facts in a competent way and we can think for ourselves.
Stop trying to be part of history. And certainly please avoid giving us your delusions of it.

By the way, future events and contemporary civil governance is not history, losers.

20 posted on 01/28/2003 3:08:36 PM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
Here is one for the historians and liberals:

The Democrats' Case Against Saddam Hussein (Dems nailed, yet again)

Headline Rundown and links on Iraq - Things the democrats have conviently forgot...

Saddam Abused His Last Chance, Clinton -clear and present danger to safety of people everywhere 1998

Gore repeats that Saddam MUST GO - June 2000

What the democrats want you to forget

Iraq is a Regional Threat, capable of as much as 200 tons of VX nerve agent (1999 Clinton report)

Czech military reports say iraq has smallpox virus in weapons stockpile (and camelpox)

2/7/1998 : Arab media: Clinton will strike due to sex scandal (&links to tons of arab news on clinton)

Iraqi chemical weapons buildup reported (Sept 2001 Report)

Clinton, Gore rally domestic support for strike at Iraq, "unholy axis" (1998 Must read)

statement President Clinton from 1998 on the air strikesIraq Liberation Act of 1998 - Full Text, Sense of Congress - Remove Saddam

21 posted on 01/28/2003 3:09:18 PM PST by chance33_98 (Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
In other news, 400 Constitutional scholars...
23 posted on 01/28/2003 3:12:38 PM PST by redbaiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
Let me start my own Historians' list. I favor taking out Iraq, and Saddam. Anyone care to join me?

Prof. Larry Schweikart, History Department, University of Dayon

25 posted on 01/28/2003 3:13:19 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame

VISUALIZE WORLD APPEASMENT

"Peace in our lifetime"

29 posted on 01/28/2003 3:28:13 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
Well, now, let's see what we have. Historians study history, right? Anyone who cracks open a history book about the process leading up to World War II will find a discussion of "America First," an anti-war organization lead by (sadly) the esteemed Charles Lindberg.

The war had already begun in both Europe and Asia. The argument of America First was for the US to stay out of it. Their public argument was, essentially, "What has Hitler done to us?" (to paraphrase that renowned historian, Susan Sarandon.)

Historians who ignore history are as dangerous as surgeons who have a shaky knife, or lawyers who are drunk in court. I remind these alleged historians of a comment of one of their own, the late, great Georges Santayana, "Those who ignore their history are condemned to repeat it."

The former anti-war effort which was a minority but quite vocal until December, 1941, was a pistache of passivists, dupes, German-Americans, and Nazi supporters who were hiding behind the banner of passivism. It was strikingly similar to the current anti-war effort in the combination of strange bedfellows.

Hey, come to think of it, isn't it the proper business of historians to comb through history looking for examples that are close to a present circumstance to shed light on it and better understand it? Historians, heal thyselves.

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest column for UPI, "Necessary Lies -- Iraq & N. Korea" (Now up on UPI wire, and FR.)

As the politician formerly known as Al Gore has said, Buy my book, "to Restore Trust in America"

30 posted on 01/28/2003 3:31:10 PM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame; All
PARENTS!! Heads up - when you read this list of Colleges joining this network, you will know where NOT to send your children!!
33 posted on 01/28/2003 3:33:59 PM PST by CyberAnt ( Syracuse where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
History shows tyrants should be dealt with quickly and violently. Nobody really enjoys a war but every generation breeds its new Hitlers and they don't go away through appeasement or neglect.

Those who say violence never solves anything don't know anything about history. The massive violence of all-out war has ended a hell of a lot of trouble throughout history. You can't talk a murdering tyrant out of his mad ambition. The quicker you kill the bastard, the more lives you save.

I think Tennessee's Sgt. Alvin York, a notable soldier of World War I and a devout Christian who hated violence, said it correctly. "I killed to prevent a greater amount of death."

War is profoundly regrettable and absolutely necessary from time to time. This is such a time.

34 posted on 01/28/2003 3:34:43 PM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame; Alamo-Girl
Seems like they don't like foreign military engagements. DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON

Washington Post 3/6/99 Nat Hentoff "…Not widely known, however, is that more than 240 American historians have come forth with a call for impeachment -- on different grounds. The new petition declares: "Impeach Bill Clinton for the Right Reasons: Not for Lewinsky, but Rather for the Illegal Bombing of Iraq, Afghanistan and Sudan." This proposed indictment was first circulated during the Jan. 7-10 meeting of the American Historical Association in Washington…. The petition cites a violation of the War Powers Clause of the Constitution (Article I, Section 8). Although Congress "shall have Power to . . . declare War," Clinton only marginally consulted a few of its leaders and did not go through the required stages of meaningful consultation as mandated by the War Powers Resolution of 1973. Also violated, according to these historians, was Executive Order 12.333, Sec. 2-305, which prohibits assassination or conspiracy to assassinate human foreign targets…."

36 posted on 01/28/2003 3:35:42 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yankeedame
people who have done little for decades

Yep, that's your typical peacenik right there.

40 posted on 01/28/2003 3:40:56 PM PST by SerfsUp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson