Skip to comments.
Arrest wasn't first time police had eye on (sexual predator) Ritter
Albany Times Union Newspaper
Posted on 01/21/2003 6:57:20 AM PST by 1Old Pro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: Dog
I am completely willing to believe that Ritter is being blackmailed. The only question is whether they are blackmailing him with this or with something much worse. Given that pedophiles are usually acting as part of a larger pattern, it is the high probability that something much worse is out there that makes me think that he could be subject to much stronger compulsion by a blackmailer.
In any case, this whole business makes him enough of a security risk that if he says the sky is blue, I'm going to go outside and check for myself.
41
posted on
01/21/2003 7:42:05 AM PST
by
gridlock
(Blocking the box since 1999)
To: PhiKapMom
Maybe the guy is just plain nuts
42
posted on
01/21/2003 7:43:20 AM PST
by
woofie
To: woofie
I agree he is nuts but no one does a 180 like he did! More behind it!
43
posted on
01/21/2003 7:45:00 AM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: 1Old Pro
Sounds to me like the only place that should be smoking is the spot where his manhood "used to be".
44
posted on
01/21/2003 7:45:06 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(The only thing worse than seeing our troops die on foreign soil, is watching citizens die on ours.)
To: DoughtyOne
Someone should be asking WHY DID THE COLONIE POLICE LET HIM GO THE FIRST TIME? And why are the court records sealed?
45
posted on
01/21/2003 7:47:13 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
Drudge has dropped the ball on this one. Too bad, if he did some investigative work this could be huge for his site.
46
posted on
01/21/2003 7:48:42 AM PST
by
Registered
(Be a Star, donate to FR.)
To: 1Old Pro
Some newshound in Gainesville FL should look around there also.
47
posted on
01/21/2003 7:49:26 AM PST
by
cynicom
To: 1Old Pro
Only Scotty Boy is to blame. You'll get no argument from me! Don't do anything you wouldn't be willing to discuss at the Church Coffee Hour on Sunday, that's my motto!
I was just responding to a statement that it seems that a lot of high office holders appear to be perverts. I think that this may be due to the fact that there are a lot of people who are very interested in providing them with temptations that are generally not present. Match that up with an underlying proclivity, and you have a ready-made subject for blackmail.
One would have to assume that this is going on, wouldn't one?
48
posted on
01/21/2003 7:52:53 AM PST
by
gridlock
(Blocking the box since 1999)
To: Registered
To: PhiKapMom
We will see...maybe you are right ...Just looking at the Ritter Id say he is wound a bit too tight
(I think he could go off at any minute)
50
posted on
01/21/2003 7:54:09 AM PST
by
woofie
To: All
51
posted on
01/21/2003 7:54:31 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
I suspected that he was a sicko when he did a 180 on the iraq deal.I didn't know how SICK he was!!
To: seamole
It's on Drudge, now. Not a headline, but there are two story links. The lead story says that Ritter just filmed an "anti-war commercial" in NYC, then headed to Bagdad. (I'm sure, Uncle Saddam has a "present" waiting for him.) What a piece of work. Sleazeball.
Ritter's best bud William Pitt and his liberal ilk probably think that this sort of behavior is cool. Like their hero Clinton, sexual exploitation of women is A OK for lefties, so long as the "heroes" are useful idiots that support the liberal agenda. Believe me, Democratic and left-wing men are notorious women-degraders. (I should know. I was once a Democrat until Clinton's chauvinistic, hypocritical behavior exposed the truth about Dem/liberal DENIAL and DOUBLE STANDARDS.) Liberals are totally without shame. At least conservatives will hold accountable and then get rid of their embarassing jerks. Liberals, LIE, EXCUSE, and DEFEND their sleazoids. (Oh, and liberals also BLAME the VRWC for their own kind's despicable behavior.)
53
posted on
01/21/2003 7:56:56 AM PST
by
demnomo
To: Badabing Badaboom
it all depends on the law of the particular state. Some states have 'age of consent' laws that allow a man to have sex with a 16 year old girl if the man is only 3-5 years older than the girl. But each state has different laws. I'm sure in some states even an 18 year old man could go to jail for having sex with his 17 year old girlfriend.
To: 1Old Pro
I hate Scott R. just like most others here. But I have to ask the question...
Is there a chance that this is just a flame job on him to shut him up. This way he is spending so much time defending against these charges that he cannot focus on other issues?
Ritter is a pig but I had to ask.
To: 1Old Pro
Incredible.
To: Quilla
Yes. I wonder why he held off so long. I don't wonder about the mainstream media. I know why they have held off, and continue to.
57
posted on
01/21/2003 8:04:53 AM PST
by
per loin
Comment #58 Removed by Moderator
To: Red Jones
Wisconsin law says 24 months.
59
posted on
01/21/2003 8:11:38 AM PST
by
Catspaw
To: per loin
Well, first we had Ritter denying it was him - claiming mistaken identity. Then, with the exception of Fox and Rush, no major media outlets covered the story. Maybe Drudge was waiting for proof positive before opening up his 5,000,000 hits-a-day can of worms. The John Edwards of the world will make one cautious.
60
posted on
01/21/2003 8:13:48 AM PST
by
Quilla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson