Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Study Suggests Missing Link That Explains How Dinosaurs Learned To Fly
National Science Foundation Press Release ^ | January 16, 2003 | Kenneth Dial

Posted on 01/17/2003 6:35:24 AM PST by forsnax5

Arlington, Va. -- Two-legged dinosaurs may have used their forelimbs as wing-like structures to propel themselves rapidly up steep inclines long before they took to the skies, reports a University of Montana researcher in the January 17 issue of the journal Science. The new theory adds a middle step that may link two current and opposing explanations for how reptiles evolved into flying birds.

According to Kenneth Dial, author of the report, the transition from ground travel to flight may have required a "ramp-up" phase in which rapid movement of the animal's front appendages actually forced its body downward to gain more foot traction as it made its way up increasingly vertical slopes.

"The big dilemma has been, 'How do you explain the partial wing?,'" says Dial, who is a professor of vertebrate morphology and ecology. "It turns out the proto-wings -- precursors to wings birds have today -- actually acted more like a spoiler on the back of a race car to keep the animal sure-footed even while climbing up nearly vertical surfaces," he said.

"The development and role of movement in animals is critical to every aspect of their lives, " says William Zamer of the National Science Foundation (NSF), the agency that funded the study. "The results may also one day help humans design better vehicles for both land and air travel."

NSF is an independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education in all fields of science and engineering.

The evolution of flying vertebrates has been a bone of contention since the 1800's. One school, which embraced the cursorial theory, argued that two-legged, ground-dwelling animals developed feathered wings that allowed them to become airborne. The opposing school, which favored the arboreal theory, held that flight originated in tree-dwelling animals that leapt from limb to limb and eventually developed gliding structures to soften their landings. For a century-and-a-half, each camp has tendered evidence to challenge the opposing theory.

The solution, Dial says, may lie in an ordinary flapping behavior, which he calls "wing-assisted incline running," or WAIR, found in many modern-day hatchling and adult birds. "Although this behavior is common in nature, " he writes, WAIR's role in the evolution and survival of birds "has remained unappreciated" because it happens in short bursts that are difficult to study in the wild.

So, Dial, who is also a licensed commercial an instrument-rated pilot, applied to partridges devices that sensed g-force and used high-speed film to document wing orientation in a laboratory setting. He found that newly hatched birds, yet unable to fly, successfully used WAIR to climb a 50-degree incline. Slightly older birds used WAIR to climb a 90-degree, or straight-up, surface, and adult birds used their wings literally to defy gravity. Wing flapping kept their bodies secured to the underside surface of a 105-degree overhang.

"A significant portion of the wing beat cycle involves...forces that push the bird toward the inclined substrate, permitting animals to run vertically," Dial observed.

Dial proposes that WAIR in modern-day birds is a remnant of their prehistoric ancestors. "In the proto-bird, this behavior would have represented the intermediate stage in the development of flight-capable, aerodynamic wings." Further re-orientation of the wings could then allow birds to make successful ascents into the air as well as safe landings.

Experts believe birds evolved from a common ancestral protoavis dinosaur some 225 million years ago during the Mesozoic era. As the continental land mass broke apart, birds inhabited all corners of the Earth. While most bird species were wiped out with the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, many scientists consider birds the only true living relative of the dinosaurs.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist; dinosaurs; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
The linked website has some video clips of chukar partridges demonstrating the concept...
1 posted on 01/17/2003 6:35:24 AM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/17/2003 6:37:02 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Related post: Bird wings can help keep birds down, not up (BREAKING)
3 posted on 01/17/2003 6:39:08 AM PST by StriperSniper (Start heating the TAR, I'll go get the FEATHERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; jennyp; balrog666; general_re; Right Wing Professor; ...
Early bird speculation Ping!
4 posted on 01/17/2003 6:39:11 AM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Okay
5 posted on 01/17/2003 6:43:40 AM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
The other post beat you by a few minutes but I'll repeat my comment here.

I get it! Two legs and two flapping arms are better for climbing surfaces than are four grasping appendages. Sounds logical!

6 posted on 01/17/2003 6:48:57 AM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
As C.S. Lewis said:

Christians have to believe in a loving and all-powerful God.

Scientists have to believe that life spontaneously came into existence out of inorganic compounds, that this primitive life eventually evolved into plants, that the plants evolved into primitive animals, that the animals evolved into birds, insects, reptiles, fish, amphibians, and mammals. Scientists further believe that some of the mammals evolved into the primates, that some of the primates evovled into Neandethals with big brains, and that the big-brained Neanderthals were superceded by the small-brained Cro-Magnons. Scientists go on to believe that Cro-Magnons were in the world for 50,000 years without really amounting to much, until about 5000 years ago when things began to improve. Suddenly, after about a billion years of this evolution, scientists believe that we needed only 5000 years to go from living in caves to walking on the Moon.

I'm not a scientist. I don't have that much Faith.

7 posted on 01/17/2003 6:52:23 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Hey... I saw a big friggin' turkey flying the other day.

First thing I thought was DINOSAUR!

Then again, I'm on medication and have a micro-chip in my neck!

8 posted on 01/17/2003 6:57:21 AM PST by johnny7 (There coming down the chimney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
hey, do you think if I flap earnestly and sincerely that I too, can sprout wings.
9 posted on 01/17/2003 7:10:10 AM PST by mamalujo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
YEC skeptical doubts. There are too many differences. Scales on dinosaurs were folds in the skin, not precursors to feathers, which are hair-like folicles. The bones of birds are hollow, dinosaurs are not. The respiratory systems are totally different: dinosaurs would breathe in and out, the way humans do. Birds breathe in only, and the air passes out a different route. Most importantly, the DNA information for the feathers and the respiratory system found in birds is not found in dinosaurs...the change from dinosaur DNA to bird DNA would be like trying to make a Tom Clancy book into a Barbara Bradford book after it was published...it just ain't going to happen.
10 posted on 01/17/2003 7:22:44 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Interesting. Highly speculative, but very interesting...
11 posted on 01/17/2003 7:25:20 AM PST by general_re (Why PH never gets banned - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/589263/posts?page=21#21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I'm not a scientist. I don't have that much Faith.

Nor much curiosity, apparantly.

12 posted on 01/17/2003 7:25:22 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I'm not a scientist.

Well, that's pretty obvious...

It IS possible to be a scientist and a Christian, you know. God made the Universe, and scientists study how it works. God gave you a mind. You should develop it.

13 posted on 01/17/2003 7:28:17 AM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
The linked website has some video clips of chukar partridges demonstrating the concept...

Major problem with their model...a chukar is already a bird...with bird DNA, with bird bones, and with a bird respiratory system. The chukar doesn't have to overcome the DNA/information deficiency that a reptile would. What amazing faith these scientists must possess!

14 posted on 01/17/2003 7:29:29 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Amen...and a Christian scientist has something going for him or her that the non-Christian doesn't - the knowledge that there is order and purpose in the cosmos...and it is there for us to discover and wonder about! Psalm 19
15 posted on 01/17/2003 7:31:06 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
maybe those penguins who are swimming in circles in SF are simply trying to evolve and fly out of there
16 posted on 01/17/2003 7:31:12 AM PST by meowmeow (maybe I should start flapping here at my desk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: forsnax5
Two-legged dinosaurs may have used their forelimbs as wing-like structures to propel themselves rapidly up steep inclines long before they took to the skies...

Yeah, right. What a laugh.

The new theory adds a middle step that may link two current and opposing explanations for how reptiles evolved into flying birds.

Sounds like they now have THREE "current and opposing" theories. And they say creationists will believe anything?

18 posted on 01/17/2003 7:33:57 AM PST by far sider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Last week, I saw video of a bird called a cassawary. I have seen the remains of bird like dinasours with bony protusions along the ridge of their scalp. The cassawary had such a protrusion.

Cassawary=bird=dinasour qed

19 posted on 01/17/2003 7:34:45 AM PST by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Motherbear
Yep!
20 posted on 01/17/2003 7:39:47 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson