Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Judge Bork predicted this in his book, "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline"

Only in NJ

Assmenblywoman Loretta Weinberg again

1 posted on 01/15/2003 9:32:34 AM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Another Post with NJ Assemblywoman Loretta Weinberg, the consummate, ultra, Left-wing liberal Democrat!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/822863/posts

2 posted on 01/15/2003 9:34:43 AM PST by Coleus (RU 486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonF; Incorrigible
The state's position is ironic, said Mark Lewis, an Episcopal minister in Secaucus who is a plaintiff with his partner of 10 years, Dennis Winslow, another Episcopal priest. >>>>

They must be followers of Bishop Spong.
3 posted on 01/15/2003 9:36:37 AM PST by Coleus (RU 486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
Get government out of marriage. Totally out. Free citizens of a free country should be able to make their own family arrangements without government interference. Just think, all those cohabiting senior citizens who might like to get married but can't afford to since the government would cut their social security benefits, would be free to march down to their local church and get married.
4 posted on 01/15/2003 9:38:12 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PaulNYC; tsomer; Mixer; MattinNJ; OceanKing; TomT in NJ; Coleus; agrace; Alberta's Child; ...
This Loretta Weinberg turned out to be some left-wing activist and ideologue: Bashing Bush with FDA appointments, gun control, smart gun technology, gay marriages, ballistic fingerprinting for gun barrels, etc.
7 posted on 01/15/2003 9:47:22 AM PST by Coleus (RU 486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
Oh where to start...

"I'm your neighbor next door," Toby urged people to say. "I ride the bus with you, I sit next to you at lunch. ... I am the face of gay and lesbian America." I'm as ugly as the south end of a north bound pit bull, I do unnatural things with other ugly women and I corrupt children whenever they are exposed to me.

The suit was filed in June in Hudson County and is moving to Mercer County at the attorney general's request. It argues that denying same-sex couples the benefits and responsibilities of marriage violates their constitutional right to equal protection and privacy.

None of these perverts has been denied the right to marry. They have the same exact right to marry as I do. What they don't have is special rights to have their perversion legitimized by social recognition

The state's position is ironic, said Mark Lewis, an Episcopal minister in Secaucus who is a plaintiff with his partner of 10 years, Dennis Winslow, another Episcopal priest.

An episcopal priest performing abomination. He's headed on a fast track to hell. How can he be a priest and not read the bible?

"The state of New Jersey believes we are perfectly fit to officiate at wedding ceremonies," he said. "But it says we are not fit to be married ourselves.

And again he has the same right to marry that I do. He doesn't deserve special rights.

16 posted on 01/15/2003 11:09:10 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
"Outside, cars in the parking lot bore bumper stickers with slogans of the movement: "Hate is not a family value."

Homosexuality is definitely not a family value either

21 posted on 01/15/2003 11:47:01 AM PST by SunnyUsa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
"Hate is not a family value."

Neither is perversity.

22 posted on 01/15/2003 12:08:14 PM PST by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
well let's follow the other states too mantra........
28 posted on 01/15/2003 5:24:34 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
Only in NJ

Aw, you're giving our little state too much credit. I am sure this is a regular thing in Ca. Not that that is my choice state to raise my family either.

29 posted on 01/18/2003 8:14:16 AM PST by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
When was political power shifted from our elected officials to judges? Is this something NJ should have voted on?
30 posted on 09/29/2003 2:23:10 PM PDT by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...

 Jerseyans support civil unions for gay couples

Poll shows liberal state attitude differs from national numbers

Monday, September 29, 2003

BY JUDY PEET
Star-Ledger Staff

They may not endorse same-sex marriage, but a majority of New Jerseyans favor "civil unions" that would confer many of the same legal benefits of matrimony to lesbian and gay couples, according to the latest Star-Ledger/Eagleton-Rutgers Poll.

In responses much more liberal than previous national polls, 52 percent of New Jersey residents support civil unions and six out of 10 said same-sex couples should be entitled to health insurance and Social Security benefits through their partners.

Even on the subject of marriage rites -- a topic the respondents found more difficult to accept -- support for legalizing gay marriage ran 43 percent overall and as high as 64 percent among younger New Jerseyans, the poll found.

By comparison, a recent national poll by ABC News found that only 37 percent of Americans favor legalizing gay marriage and only 40 percent support civil unions.

"When it comes to the legal status of homosexual partnerships, New Jerseyans tend to be more progressive than the nation as a whole, particularly with regard to the idea of civil unions," said Patrick Murray, the poll's associate director.

Murray said, however, that the responses were very much age related. While support for same-sex marriage and benefits was strong among young New Jerseyans, the majority of respondents over age 50 favored neither.

"It's just the way I was raised," said William Weber, 65, of Hardwick. "I think gay people have a right to live how they want, but I don't think it's right."

Several respondents distinguished between legal and moral issues.

"If a gay couple have been in a relationship for 20 years, they are entitled to the same legal rights as anybody else," said Karen Cavalieri, 43, of Rochelle Park. "But marriage is a religious institution and in the eyes of God, I don't think it's right."

Perhaps the most surprising results of the poll -- particularly after a summer when the Vatican aggressively argued against legalizing gay marriage -- were that the state's Catholics supported same-sex unions significantly more than Protestants.

Forty-three percent of Catholics said they favored same-sex marriage, compared to 32 percent of Protestants polled. The difference may be less about religion, however, than age.

"The Protestant population in New Jersey tends to be skewed toward older adults," Murray said. "And it is the age-based disparity in opinion ... that we are seeing in these denominational results."

On the question of legalizing marriage, the favorable responses ranged from 64 percent among those ages 18 to 29, to only 27 percent for those ages 50 and older. Even in the over-50 age group, however, four out of 10 people still favored civil unions.

As with other groups, the Catholics who supported gay marriage tended to be younger members of the church.

"I may not be a traditional Catholic, but I wish the church could be more flexible because there are gays who are very serious about their faith," said Elizabeth Roberts, 24, of Manchester.

"Maybe I could burn in hell for thinking gays are the same as anybody else and entitled to the same rights, but I just don't think it's that big a deal," said Terrance Farrell, 27, of North Brunswick.

The issue is becoming a big deal in New Jersey, a key state in the gay marriage battlefield. Seven gay couples have filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a state law barring same-sex marriage, and there is a civil union bill pending in the Legislature that would extend benefits to gay and unmarried heterosexual couples.

Gay rights activists said the campaign against legalizing gay marriage -- one actively supported by the Vatican, the religious right and the White House -- could account for a drop in the positive response in New Jersey in comparison to a similar poll released in July.

That Zogby International Poll, commissioned by advocates for legalizing same-sex unions, found that 55 percent of New Jerseyans overall and 57 percent of Catholics favored such action.

"While the new numbers may be lower, they still show nearly half the state supports legalizing gay marriage," said Michael Adams, spokesman for the Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, a nonprofit advocacy group for gays that is lobbying for New Jersey's proposed domestic partner bill. "And this is after the right wing spent the entire summer trying to scare everyone about homosexuals."

A different spin on the numbers was offered by John Tomicki, executive director of the League of American Families, a group strongly opposed to same-sex marriage.

"These numbers show what we have always said, that the Zogby poll was flawed and a majority of the public support marriage as being defined solely as a union between one man and one woman," Tomicki said. "At best, and we don't necessarily agree, the public is evenly divided on the issue and that should not be enough to change public policy."

The Eagleton poll also found that 53 percent of state residents believe New Jersey government should recognize a same-sex marriage if it were performed in another state and the couple moved here.

Currently that is a moot point, since no state allows legal same-sex marriage, although Vermont did enact a law three years ago establishing civil unions for gays and lesbians.


31 posted on 09/29/2003 2:34:10 PM PDT by Coleus (Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
Ever notice how in Jersey elections, men are evenly split or lean Republican, but women vote OVERWHELMINGLY Democratic (unless the candidate is Christie Toad Witless).
35 posted on 09/29/2003 4:34:34 PM PDT by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
Monday evening, the mood was jubilant inside the grand mansion that houses Morristown Unitarian Fellowship.

Unitarian. Hardly surprising, unfortunately.

41 posted on 09/30/2003 9:48:49 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scripter
Domestic partner bill called in line with McGreevey's concerns
 
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — A Democrat-sponsored bill that would allow same-sex couples to form domestic partnerships and thereby gain some of the tax and insurance benefits enjoyed by married couples could become law by early next year, according to a spokesman for Gov. James E. McGreevey.
 
The measure introduced by Senate Co-President Richard Codey, an Essex County Democrat, would limit domestic partnerships to heterosexual couples 63 and older who could jeopardize pension benefits by remarrying, and to adult same-sex couples.
 
An earlier measure in the Assembly would have enabled any two unmarried adults living together to gain the benefits of domestic partnerships. The Assembly version drew criticism from McGreevey as too broad and expensive.
 
"Now we're at a point where we're hopeful we can get a domestic partnership benefits bill on the governor's desk during the lame-duck session," McGreevey spokesman Micah Rasmussen told The Sunday Star-Ledger of Newark.
 
"This has been the governor's position for a long time," he said. "The state seems to be supportive of an equitable solution like this one."
 
Advocates for gay rights embraced the prospects of the legislation. But they vowed to continue court fights to form same-sex marriages. In November, a Mercer County judge rejected a lawsuit by same-sex couples, who argued they had a constitutional right to marry.
 
While turning away the suit, Superior Court Judge Linda Feinberg did urge lawmakers to consider legislation for domestic partner benefits.
 
"We're hoping this is going to be a good holiday for a lot of families, and we're going to get some benefits out of it," said Laura Pople, president of the New Jersey Gay and Lesbian Coalition.
 
Under Codey's measure, those who form domestic partnerships would have to be unmarried and living together, and they would have to agree to be responsible for each other's basic living expenses.
 
Private employers would be allowed to charge their employees for extending health benefits to their domestic partners.
 
Domestic partners would gain tax advantages, including the right to inherit property like spouses. Domestic partners also would be considered each others' next of kin for the purposes of making medical decisions and hospital visitation.
 
"It's very difficult when your partner of 30 years is in the hospital and you're not allowed in," said Michael Blake, president of New Jersey's chapter of the gay rights organization Stonewall Democrats.
http://www.nj.com/newsflash/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-5/1070824442264842.xml

49 posted on 12/08/2003 8:19:44 AM PST by Coleus (Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson