Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Rodham's Wellesley Commencement Speech
Wellesley College ^ | May 31, 1969 | Hillary Rodham

Posted on 01/08/2003 7:51:54 PM PST by Slyfox

Wellesley College
1969 Student Commencement Speech
Hillary D. Rodham
May 31, 1969

Ruth M. Adams, ninth president of Wellesley College, introduced Hillary D. Rodham, '69, at the 91st commencement exercises, as follows:

Remarks of Hillary D. Rodham, President of the Wellesley College Government Association and member of the Class of 1969, on the occasion of Wellesley's 91st Commencement, May 31, 1969:

I am very glad that Miss Adams made it clear that what I am speaking for today is all of us -- the 400 of us -- and I find myself in a familiar position, that of reacting, something that our generation has been doing for quite a while now. We're not in the positions yet of leadership and power, but we do have that indispensable task of criticizing and constructive protest and I find myself reacting just briefly to some of the things that Senator Brooke said. This has to be brief because I do have a little speech to give. Part of the problem with empathy with professed goals is that empathy doesn't do us anything. We've had lots of empathy; we've had lots of sympathy, but we feel that for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible. What does it mean to hear that 13.3% of the people in this country are below the poverty line? That's a percentage. We're not interested in social reconstruction; it's human reconstruction. How can we talk about percentages and trends? The complexities are not lost in our analyses, but perhaps they're just put into what we consider a more human and eventually a more progressive perspective. The question about possible and impossible was one that we brought with us to Wellesley four years ago. We arrived not yet knowing what was not possible. Consequently, we expected a lot. Our attitudes are easily understood having grown up, having come to consciousness in the first five years of this decade -- years dominated by men with dreams, men in the civil rights movement, the Peace Corps, the space program -- so we arrived at Wellesley and we found, as all of us have found, that there was a gap between expectation and realities. But it wasn't a discouraging gap and it didn't turn us into cynical, bitter old women at the age of 18. It just inspired us to do something about that gap. What we did is often difficult for some people to understand. They ask us quite often: "Why, if you're dissatisfied, do you stay in a place?" Well, if you didn't care a lot about it you wouldn't stay. It's almost as though my mother used to say, "I'll always love you but there are times when I certainly won't like you." Our love for this place, this particular place, Wellesley College, coupled with our freedom from the burden of an inauthentic reality allowed us to question basic assumptions underlying our education. Before the days of the media orchestrated demonstrations, we had our own gathering over in Founder's parking lot. We protested against the rigid academic distribution requirement. We worked for a pass-fail system. We worked for a say in some of the process of academic decision making. And luckily we were in a place where, when we questioned the meaning of a liberal arts education there were people with enough imagination to respond to that questioning. So we have made progress. We have achieved some of the things that initially saw as lacking in that gap between expectation and reality. Our concerns were not, of course, solely academic as all of us know. We worried about inside Wellesley questions of admissions, the kind of people that should be coming to Wellesley, the process for getting them here. We questioned about what responsibility we should have both for our lives as individuals and for our lives as members of a collective group.

Coupled with our concerns for the Wellesley inside here in the community were our concerns for what happened beyond Hathaway House. We wanted to know what relationship Wellesley was going to have to the outer world. We were lucky in that one of the first things Miss Adams did was to set up a Cross-Registration with MIT because everyone knows that education just can't have any parochial bounds any more. One of the other things that we did was the Upward Bound program. There are so many other things that we could talk about; so many attempts, at least the way we saw it, to pull ourselves into the world outside. And I think we've succeeded. There will be an Upward Bound program, just for one example, on the campus this summer.

Many of the issues that I've mentioned -- those of sharing power and responsibility, those of assuming power and responsibility have been general concerns on campuses throughout the world. But underlying those concerns there is a theme, a theme which is so trite and so old because the words are so familiar. It talks about integrity and trust and respect. Words have a funny way of trapping our minds on the way to our tongues but there are necessary means even in this multi-media age for attempting to come to grasps with some of the inarticulate maybe even inarticulable things that we're feeling. We are, all of us, exploring a world that none of us even understands and attempting to create within that uncertainty. But there are some things we feel, feelings that our prevailing, acquisitive, and competitive corporate life, including tragically the universities, is not the way of life for us. We're searching for more immediate, ecstatic and penetrating mode of living. And so our questions, our questions about our institutions, about our colleges, about our churches, about our government continue. The questions about those institutions are familiar to all of us. We have seen heralded across the newspapers. Senator Brooke has suggested some of them this morning. But along with using these words -- integrity, trust, and respect -- in regard to institutions and leaders we're perhaps harshest with them in regard to ourselves.

Every protest, every dissent, whether it's an individual academic paper, Founder's parking lot demonstration, is unabashedly an attempt to forge an identity in this particular age. That attempt at forging for many of us over the past four years has meant coming to terms with our humanness. Within the context of a society that we perceive -- now we can talk about reality, and I would like to talk about reality sometime, authentic reality, inauthentic reality, and what we have to accept of what we see -- but our perception of it is that it hovers often between the possibility of disaster and the potentiality for imaginatively responding to men's needs. There's a very strange conservative strain that goes through a lot of New Left, collegiate protests that I find very intriguing because it harkens back to a lot of the old virtues, to the fulfillment of original ideas. And it's also a very unique American experience. It's such a great adventure. If the experiment in human living doesn't work in this country, in this age, it's not going to work anywhere.

But we also know that to be educated, the goal of it must be human liberation. A liberation enabling each of us to fulfill our capacity so as to be free to create within and around ourselves. To be educated to freedom must be evidenced in action, and here again is where we ask ourselves, as we have asked our parents and our teachers, questions about integrity, trust, and respect. Those three words mean different things to all of us. Some of the things they can mean, for instance: Integrity, the courage to be whole, to try to mold an entire person in this particular context, living in relation to one another in the full poetry of existence. If the only tool we have ultimately to use is our lives, so we use it in the way we can by choosing a way to live that will demonstrate the way we feel and the way we know. Integrity -- a man like Paul Santmire. Trust. This is one word that when I asked the class at our rehearsal what it was they wanted me to say for them, everyone came up to me and said "Talk about trust, talk about the lack of trust both for us and the way we feel about others. Talk about the trust bust." What can you say about it? What can you say about a feeling that permeates a generation and that perhaps is not even understood by those who are distrusted? All they can do is keep trying again and again and again. There's that wonderful line in East Coker by Eliot about there's only the trying, again and again and again; to win again what we've lost before.

And then respect. There's that mutuality of respect between people where you don't see people as percentage points. Where you don't manipulate people. Where you're not interested in social engineering for people. The struggle for an integrated life existing in an atmosphere of communal trust and respect is one with desperately important political and social consequences. And the word "consequences" of course catapults us into the future. One of the most tragic things that happened yesterday, a beautiful day, was that I was talking to woman who said that she wouldn't want to be me for anything in the world. She wouldn't want to live today and look ahead to what it is she sees because she's afraid. Fear is always with us but we just don't have time for it. Not now.

There are two people that I would like to thank before concluding. That's Ellie Acheson, who is the spearhead for this, and also Nancy Scheibner who wrote this poem which is the last thing that I would like to read:

My entrance into the world of so-called "social problems"
Must be with quiet laughter, or not at all.
The hollow men of anger and bitterness
The bountiful ladies of righteous degradation
All must be left to a bygone age.
And the purpose of history is to provide a receptacle
For all those myths and oddments
Which oddly we have acquired
And from which we would become unburdened
To create a newer world
To transform the future into the present.
We have no need of false revolutions
In a world where categories tend to tyrannize our minds
And hang our wills up on narrow pegs.
It is well at every given moment to seek the limits in our lives.
And once those limits are understood
To understand that limitations no longer exist.
Earth could be fair. And you and I must be free
Not to save the world in a glorious crusade
Not to kill ourselves with a nameless gnawing pain
But to practice with all the skill of our being
The art of making possible.

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1969; bunkum; clinton; college; hillary; rodham; speech; wellesley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
How uplifting.
I hate poems that don’t rhyme.
1 posted on 01/08/2003 7:51:54 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Worth a look see.
2 posted on 01/08/2003 7:52:33 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
Worth a look see.

Im going to print up a stack of them and use them as toilet paper during the next snowstorm.

3 posted on 01/08/2003 7:54:26 PM PST by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
My goodness, this woman could be hung by her own words regarding power and power-sharing. What a freaking hypocrite.
4 posted on 01/08/2003 7:57:03 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
Sounds like a typical thought pattern for a 1960s college student. In all of those words, I don't think she actually said a damned thing.
5 posted on 01/08/2003 7:58:50 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox; cardinal4; Mr. Mulliner
For more on Hillary's college days, see one of the funniest threads of the last couple years, FR's interactive novel:

A Wellesly Wench

6 posted on 01/08/2003 8:00:33 PM PST by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Actually, the wordiness without saying anything denotes two things: She was speaking not to the entire gathering but only to those primed for what she had to say. Also, it is a trait shared by many psychpaths.
7 posted on 01/08/2003 8:01:32 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
I remember that! What a hoot! Thanks, I am going to bookmark it for all to see when they visit my profile page.
8 posted on 01/08/2003 8:02:47 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
I'm more interested in reading HilLIARy's Senior Thesis. It's supposedly under VERY tight wraps.
9 posted on 01/08/2003 8:03:00 PM PST by martin_fierro (He who laughs last thinks slowest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
In all of those words, I don't think she actually said a damned thing.

She said something... she just didn't think something, though.

10 posted on 01/08/2003 8:03:03 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
11 posted on 01/08/2003 8:03:30 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
One of the most tragic things that happened yesterday, a beautiful day, was that I was talking to woman who said that she wouldn't want to be me for anything in the world. She wouldn't want to live today and look ahead to what it is she sees because she's afraid.

Sounds like Hillary knew some pretty screwy people back then. I can imagine her having this conversation in a dorm room somewhere with the shades drawn, with a woman who was so afraid of the future that she didn't have the courage to get out of bed in the morning.

12 posted on 01/08/2003 8:06:06 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
Thats funny. Huangs Chinese Restaurant! LOL!!!
13 posted on 01/08/2003 8:08:13 PM PST by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
This speech was Hillary's first attempt to come across as a savioress to "her" people.
"She" will step up to the plate and be unafraid and lead those timid souls...

Sorry, time for me to get a barf bag.

14 posted on 01/08/2003 8:10:00 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Yawn, burp, barf. Wait a minute, there's another's's coming......RIPPPPPPP! Ah, the fart! Just what is needed to top off the response.

HRC is an ODB, and an ODB she will always be.

ODB=Old Dou#hebag).

15 posted on 01/08/2003 8:16:34 PM PST by timydnuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
I got through more than half of this but........ can you PLEASE interpret this for me. I must not be anywhere near as smart as the smartest woman in the world. Am I dense? Can't understand anything.......
16 posted on 01/08/2003 8:19:57 PM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
In all of those words, I don't think she said a damned thing.

It's just a different day. Another scripted appearance of "know nothing" Hillary. She hasn't changed a bit, has she!!

Notice the reference to the "media" and of course the references to "trust" and "integrity".

Good article. It says a lot about her doesn't it...Power, power, power!!!!!!!!

17 posted on 01/08/2003 8:20:54 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Yeah, I'd like to see it also but just in case you are curious, Saul Alinsky was the subject matter.

Here is an article that was written about the thesis.

18 posted on 01/08/2003 8:22:24 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
read later
19 posted on 01/08/2003 8:27:08 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
In this speech, Hillary is introducing herself to the world at large as a leader among the Radicals. She is using language that probably many of the students understood, however, unless you are a Radical, of the Saul Alinsky persuasion, you'd sorta be left in the dark. Alinsky's entire life focus was to disrupt society as a whole and his favorite target was the middle class. Hillary was considered the perfect ideal of a 'Radical'.

I read accounts that Hillary's father wanted to shrink into his seat because she had just insulted Senator Brooke, a black man and I think he was a Republican. She used him as a 'focus of evil', as a whipping boy.

Her picture made Life Magazine.

20 posted on 01/08/2003 8:33:29 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson