Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How uplifting.
I hate poems that don’t rhyme.
1 posted on 01/08/2003 7:51:54 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland
Worth a look see.
2 posted on 01/08/2003 7:52:33 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
My goodness, this woman could be hung by her own words regarding power and power-sharing. What a freaking hypocrite.
4 posted on 01/08/2003 7:57:03 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
Sounds like a typical thought pattern for a 1960s college student. In all of those words, I don't think she actually said a damned thing.
5 posted on 01/08/2003 7:58:50 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
I'm more interested in reading HilLIARy's Senior Thesis. It's supposedly under VERY tight wraps.
9 posted on 01/08/2003 8:03:00 PM PST by martin_fierro (He who laughs last thinks slowest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
Reaction:

Yawn, burp, barf. Wait a minute, there's another response...it's coming...it's coming......RIPPPPPPP! Ah, the fart! Just what is needed to top off the response.

HRC is an ODB, and an ODB she will always be.

ODB=Old Dou#hebag).

15 posted on 01/08/2003 8:16:34 PM PST by timydnuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
I got through more than half of this but........ can you PLEASE interpret this for me. I must not be anywhere near as smart as the smartest woman in the world. Am I dense? Can't understand anything.......
16 posted on 01/08/2003 8:19:57 PM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
read later
19 posted on 01/08/2003 8:27:08 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
"integrity, trust ... trite and old"

No wonder she's all screwed up!
23 posted on 01/08/2003 9:09:30 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
The final section could only be called a "poem" in the sense of being pc doggerel.
28 posted on 01/08/2003 9:33:18 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
To be educated to freedom must be evidenced in action, and here again is where we ask ourselves, as we have asked our parents and our teachers, questions about integrity, trust, and respect. Those three words mean different things to all of us. Some of the things they can mean, for instance: Integrity, the courage to be whole, to try to mold an entire person in this particular context, living in relation to one another in the full poetry of existence. If the only tool we have ultimately to use is our lives, so we use it in the way we can by choosing a way to live that will demonstrate the way we feel and the way we know. Integrity -- a man like Paul Santmire. Trust. This is one word that when I asked the class at our rehearsal what it was they wanted me to say for them, everyone came up to me and said "Talk about trust, talk about the lack of trust both for us and the way we feel about others. Talk about the trust bust." What can you say about it? What can you say about a feeling that permeates a generation and that perhaps is not even understood by those who are distrusted? All they can do is keep trying again and again and again. There's that wonderful line in East Coker by Eliot about there's only the trying, again and again and again; to win again what we've lost before.

Huh??? Was she high? Or just a babbling idiot? Oh well, she obviously had what it takes to be a politician, even then--in other words, the ability to go on and on and on, without saying anything. The fact that she does it so inarticulately makes one wonder how she could have been selected, out of 400 students, to give this address. She must have had extensive files on the other students...

29 posted on 01/08/2003 9:40:03 PM PST by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
What a terrible diatribe. Disjointed, said nothing.

But then we have to remember 1969. She was probably at the podium looking down into the blue haze of pot smoking pseudo bra-burning neo feminists, and this total drivel probably made sense to them.

You know, it's for the children, you know!

31 posted on 01/09/2003 7:23:38 AM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson