Gulf War II (Star Wars Parody Poster)

Mad Magazine ^ | Mad Magazine

[shadowman99]

This would be a cool poster!!! I just wish there weren't the lefty comments at the bottom!!!

[section9]

Mad Magazine is generally mildly left.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

[Texas Eagle]

Surely there must be a Freeper who knows how to edit all that left wing mumbo jumbo out of the poster.

[BraveMan]

What say ye?

[Sparta]

Ping me when the lefty comments are edited out, thanks in advance.

[Sparta]

I added a keyword which describes the poster perfectly, rat propaganda.

[Nick Danger]

I just wish there weren't the lefty comments at the bottom!!!

I'm enjoying it. There's a core group of about 20% of the people who think that stuff is oh-so-clever. There's another 20% -- us -- who are sick of running into liberal propaganda every time we pick up a magazine or turn on the TV.

Then there's the rest of the people, who used to believe, when they saw stuff like this, that it was "what everybody else thought." That was the power of having a monopoly of lefties in the media.

It doesn't work that way anymore. There's just enough other stuff out there now that people are beginning to see that things like this are not "what everybody else thinks." It's just a bunch of lefties in the media. That's all it's ever been. That's why Daschle & Co. are so pissed. The scales are dropping from millions of eyes; people who never paid any attention to "media bias" are seeing it now. The ability of the liberals, and of the Democratic Party, to dominate the culture and the agenda of the country, is at an end. It will never be back... not like it was.

I'll bet most of the people who get that poster in Mad have the same reaction you did: cool poster, I wish they hadn't hosed it up with all the stupid Berkeley crap.

[DoughtyOne]

[Nick Danger]

Ah, ya beat me by a couple minutes :)

[DoughtyOne]

I like yours too. My font utility was going through an identity crisis, but I couldn't pass up an opportunity. Heh heh heh.

[sonofatpatcher2]

Third Time Charm

I always was slow at graphics..."

[Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit]

I'm impressed by both of you.

My vote is for Nick's though, it's more concise, straightforward and mainstream. The first is a bit too much propaganda for my taste. But, the effort is nevertheles appreciated.

[sonofatpatcher2]

Guess I posted the wrong URL. Here's the correct one:

[sonofatpatcher2]

Gad, I guess my image is being censored.
If I am being censored, I do not understand as the two other posters were changed and posted. And there is nothing lewd or crude nor fattening about mine.
Any thoughts or knowledge about what is postable and what is not?

[smokegenerator]

What is wrong with the above poster?

[smokegenerator]

The only reason why your choice for Nicks is evident of your bias against the graphic designer (liberal-leaning). The one I will come up with will really piss you off, Herr Stasi.

[Cacique]

Not censored, geocities does not allow outlinkingand it also limits the number of hits.

here's a better link with a popup window. Sonofatpatcher's picture

[Cacique]

ping

[JoJo Gunn]

I noticed the first time it was posted (post #12) the whole image didn't load, so I right clicked to Show Picture and Save came up instead. Oh well, right now both have loaded fully.