Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Rawls is dead
Harvard press release ^

Posted on 11/25/2002 9:52:54 PM PST by Garak

John Rawls, influential political philosopher, dead at 81: Author of "A Theory of Justice" was James Bryant Conant University Professor Emeritus By Ken Gewertz Gazette Staff

John Rawls, the James Bryant Conant University Professor Emeritus, whose 1971 book, "A Theory of Justice" argued persuasively for a political philosophy based on equality and individual rights, died Sunday (Nov. 24) at the age of 81.

Rawls is considered by many to be the most important political philosopher of the second half of the 20th century and a powerful advocate of the liberal perspective. His work continues to be a major influence in the fields of ethics, law, political science, and economics, and has been translated into 27 languages.

Harvard University President Lawrence H. Summers said, "I am deeply saddened by the death of John Rawls. He combined profound wisdom with equally profound humanity. Few if any modern philosophers have had as decisive an impact on how we think about justice. Scholars in many different fields will continue to learn from him for generations to come."

Charles Fried, the Beneficial Professor of Law at Harvard, said of Rawls, "He was the dominant figure in political and moral philosophy in the second half of the 20th century. He developed an approach to the questions of moral and political philosophy which was substantive and analytic at the same time, proposing concrete answers to many questions."

In "A Theory of Justice," Rawls sets forth the proposition that "Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override. Therefore, in a just society the rights secured by justice are not subject to political bargaining or to the calculus of social interests."

Born in Baltimore, Maryland, Rawls attended the Kent School in Kent, Conn., and earned a B.A. degree from Princeton in 1943. From 1943 to 1945 he served in New Guinea, the Philippines, and Japan as an enlisted man in the U.S. infantry, later describing his military career as "singularly undistinguished." He returned to Princeton in 1946 to take up graduate studies, receiving his Ph.D. in philosophy in 1950.

Before joining the Harvard Philosophy Department in 1962, he was an instructor at Princeton (1950-52), assistant and associate professor of philosophy at Cornell (1953-59), and professor of philosophy at M.I.T. (1960-62). He was appointed the Conant University Professor at Harvard in 1979.

University professors hold Harvard's highest professorial posts. These special endowed positions were established in 1935 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College for "individuals of distinction ... working on the frontiers of knowledge, and in such a way as to cross the conventional boundaries of the specialties."

In addition to "A Theory of Justice" (nominated for a National Book Award), his publications include "Political Liberalism" (1993), "The Law of Peoples" (1999), "Collected Papers" (1999), "Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy" (2000), and "Justice as Fairness: A Restatement" (2001).

He was a member of the American Philosophical Association (president, 1974), the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Association of Political and Legal Philosophy (president, 1970-72), the American Philosophical Society, the British Academy, and the Norwegian Academy of Sciences. In 1999, he received the National Humanities Medal from the National Endowment for the Humanities.

Rawls died of heart failure at his home in Lexington, Mass. He had suffered a series of debilitating strokes that eventually left him unable to work. He leaves his wife, Margaret Warfield Fox Rawls, four children – Anne Warfield, Robert Lee, Alexander Emory, and Elizabeth Fox – and four grandchildren.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: elitism; elitists; harvard; humanism; ivorytower; johnrawls; justice; liberalism; obituary; rawls; rawlswacko; secularhumanism; stateofnature; theoryofjustice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
John Rawls is pretty much the intellectual founder of modern American liberalism
1 posted on 11/25/2002 9:52:54 PM PST by Garak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Garak
"John Rawls believes that every member of a society should enjoy equal liberties. He believes that a society can be just and fair only if all members enjoy equal freedom. At the very least, a just society must ensure that all of its members start out on equal footing. A good society should make sure that the least advantaged members receive the greatest benefits. The highest priority should be to serve the most disadvantaged member. The interests of the most advantaged member of society should be government's lowest priority."

From an article on Bioethics.

3 posted on 11/25/2002 10:00:25 PM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
I had to read some of this guy's stuff in my political science classes as an undergrad. Those readings were - by far - my least favorite.
4 posted on 11/25/2002 10:06:04 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
Hooray!!! One down, only 2 billion + to go!!!!!!!!!
5 posted on 11/25/2002 10:12:40 PM PST by SlightOfTongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlightOfTongue
If everyone just understood how influential John Rawls is to the left, and what a big frigging fig leaf for communism his philosophy is, y'all would be shocked.
6 posted on 11/25/2002 10:17:19 PM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Garak
Will his brother Lou be singing at the funeral?

Let me know, baby.

Paul
7 posted on 11/25/2002 10:18:10 PM PST by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
This garbage was required reading when I was in college.
8 posted on 11/25/2002 10:19:20 PM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
Man, and I didn't even know he was sick...
9 posted on 11/25/2002 11:18:57 PM PST by Hoosier-Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
Studied under him at Harvard and M.I.T. That stuff was hip at the time. It's taken years to purge that cr** out of my life.
10 posted on 11/25/2002 11:57:06 PM PST by CIApilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
In A Theory of Justice, Rawls attempts to use a constructivist technique similar to the one Kant used in the formulation of the categorical imperative for his moral philosophy. This technique, which Rawls hopes will show us the underpinnings of what we can all conceive us as a just state, is the so-called "veil of ignorance." By conceiving of ourselves as potential constructors of a mythical just future society, but being ignorant of our racial, social, and economic position within that society, Rawls strips away all those pieces of information he considers to be irrelevant to questions of justice.

Again, the use of many words to say nothing. Today, Harvard students write a thesis titled: "A Neo-Deconstructionist Paradigm of Pseudo-Conformity and Complex Refutation of Metaphysics.

If you say this is rabble--the "enlightened" ones say you "don't get it." Just as you clouded thinkers do not understand how framed dung is wonderful artistic expression.

Rawls was not a thinker--but instead he constructed an elaborate ruse to justify himself and his world view.

This is what a thinking man writes.

11 posted on 11/26/2002 12:15:01 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
To bad for Johnnie, God is not a liberal.
12 posted on 11/26/2002 1:10:47 AM PST by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
Rawls was the chief proponent of "reflexive equilibrium" as a methodology in Ethics. The basic idea was that a balance or middle ground should be sought between moral theory and moral "data" (i.e. our intuitive moral judgements). Having been exposed to this methodology in the college classroom, I humbly submit that it amounts in practice to the worst kind of sophistry, since virtually any moral principle can be invalidated simply by showing an hypothetical example (divorced from any meaningful context) in which a seemingly obvious intuitive moral judgement is formed contrary to it. The practical result of such a methodology is the denial of any moral absolutes, and the conclusion that the best moral philosophers are the cleverest (though not necessarily the wisest). Would that Rawls' philosophy, like himself, suffer a long overdue demise.
13 posted on 11/26/2002 2:35:46 AM PST by egomeimihi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
"John Rawls, influential political philosopher, dead at 81"

Probably should read: "John Rawls, influential socialist, dead at 81"

"Rawls is considered by many to be the most important political philosopher of the second half of the 20th century and a powerful advocate of the liberal perspective."

Well, he was an important "political philosopher" in the same way that Karl Marx was important. No wonder they admire him so at Harvard. I have to say, this is one of the few times I have seen academia come right out and (almost, but not quite) admit that when they say "liberalism," they mean socialism.

This whole article really reinforces my low opinion of the ivy league.

14 posted on 11/26/2002 3:30:23 AM PST by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
"This garbage was required reading when I was in college."

I suppose they probably balanced that by also requiring reading the works of people like F.A. Hayek?

15 posted on 11/26/2002 3:33:46 AM PST by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Garak
Kind of sickening to read how many honors academia piled on this guy.
16 posted on 11/26/2002 3:36:32 AM PST by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
Well, now that I have learned about him, I certainly will not miss him.
17 posted on 11/26/2002 3:46:26 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garak
Few if any modern philosophers have had as decisive an impact on how we think about justice.

One of the more depressing depressing sentences I've seen published.

18 posted on 11/26/2002 3:55:37 AM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Kind of sickening to read how many honors academia piled on this guy.

Two words for you: Ellsworth Toohey.

In the Fountainhead, Toohey gained a power by creating, conferring, and puffing up the importance of a number of awards on undeserving recipients.

19 posted on 11/26/2002 4:01:34 AM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Garak
Maybe the good professor just couldn't take the
GOP's recent takeover of the US Senate. This election
was a repudiation of the kind of liberalism that
Rawls spawned in his ivory tower.
20 posted on 11/26/2002 4:05:44 AM PST by AdvisorB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson