Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Senate votes to ban mercury fever thermometers
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE ^ | September 9, 2002

Posted on 09/10/2002 9:56:27 AM PDT by Korth

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Senate voted to ban the sale of mercury fever thermometers in order to curb a source of environmental contamination.

On a voice vote and without dissent, the Senate sent The Mercury Reduction and Disposal Act to the U.S. House of Representatives for concurrence.

The Environmental Protection Agency estimates medical mercury thermometers contribute about 17 tons of mercury to solid waste per year, said Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican and chief sponsor of the measure.

The bill calls for a nationwide ban on the sale of such thermometers as well as a grant program to help consumers exchange them for digital ones or other alternatives.

"Mercury fever thermometers are very easily broken. When this happens, the improper disposal of the mercury can have severe environmental and physical consequences," Collins said.

"One mercury thermometer contains about one gram of mercury," said Collins, "enough mercury to contaminate all the fish in a 20-acre (8 hectare) lake."

Her bill would also create an interagency task force, headed by the EPA, to address the problem of the global circulation of mercury and ways to reduce the mercury threat.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitution; federalgovernment; freedom; liberty; medicalcare; medicine; mercury; republicanparty; senate; thermometers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-156 next last
To: Old Professer
While there are alcohol thermometers around here, they don't get much use outdoors. Mercury neither now that you mention it. We can get 80 below sometimes, lots of broken thermometers, but my indoor-outdoor alcohol thermometer is still going probably because the outdoor bulb is metal rather than glass. Those garden coil-spring thermometers because are popular they will make it through the winter. When I buy a spring thermometer, I will pick the one closest to average from the store's selection, there's a lot of variability.
81 posted on 09/10/2002 12:22:36 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Korth
17 tons of mercury

At 1 gram/thermometer, that works out to 15,422,000 broken thermometers/year. That assumes, of course, that all the mercury from every broken thermometer winds up in landfill. Something doesn't seem quite right here...

82 posted on 09/10/2002 12:23:58 PM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Ha, I remember as a kid wishing someone would ban those rectal thermometers. Definitely a disincentive to playing sick to get out of school!
83 posted on 09/10/2002 12:26:17 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
It's a good question. May be because one needs to know a bit of chemistry to argue the facts? It's much easier to love Panda.
84 posted on 09/10/2002 12:26:46 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Eala; All
At 1 gram/thermometer, that works out to 15,422,000 broken thermometers/year. That assumes, of course, that all the mercury from every broken thermometer winds up in landfill. Something doesn't seem quite right here...

What Ms. Collins meant to say was "by forcing the replacement of all mercury thermometers in homes and hospitals and doctor's offices with digital ones, at $10 per digital thermometer, the company that provides my campaign contributions stands to make $15,422,000 . (/sarcasm)

85 posted on 09/10/2002 12:27:25 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Korth
The Environmental Protection Agency estimates medical mercury thermometers contribute about 17 tons of mercury to solid waste per year, said Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican and chief sponsor of the measure.

Mrs. Collins along with most of the rest of the arrogant overbearing women in the congress and in the administration would accomplish more worthwhile things if they would just go home, clean the commode, mow the lawn and submit themselves unto their own husbands instead of being the self appointed nannies for the nation.

We have enough trouble with the lying stealing men in the congress and the administration!

Who needs these airheads disrupting the national life with their frivolously silly ideas?

86 posted on 09/10/2002 12:37:20 PM PDT by VOYAGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Korth
...violating the tenth amendment.

Not that I'm disagreeing, but Vermont went through this nonsense last year. I remember in a statistics class I
took for my MBA. Paper companies in Maine were taxed on the mercury in their discharge because it speeded up the
"natural" accumulation of mercury in that was already being carried by the rivers downstream.

Similarly effects were notice with wood-fired generator plants. The pine needles contain cadmium leeched from the soil.

87 posted on 09/10/2002 12:38:14 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Korth
When I saw this thread, I went down to the local Walgreen's to hoard some mercury thermometers for myself. However, there was not a one to be found. They are all digital and mercury-free.

So do they even sell mercury thermometers anymore?
88 posted on 09/10/2002 12:39:48 PM PDT by pbranham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Korth
Much Ado About Nothing

All mercury thermometers were withdrawn from the market in 1968....

...they were contaminated with

tuna

(non-albacore).
89 posted on 09/10/2002 12:40:18 PM PDT by harrowup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Mercury's just bad news, all around. Perfectly acceptable substitutes exist for thermometers, so using them really makes sense, IMO...

I tend to agree although there are probably more important things for our legislators to be focusing on right now.

A few years ago I wondered why fish in San Francisco Bay have such a high mercury content and began researching an article about it. It turns out they're being contaminated by mercury left in streams as a result of the 1849 gold rush! Mercury is used to amalgamate flakes of gold mixed with magnetite after panning. Only the gold is attracted by the mercury and later the mercury is 'retorted' off with heat, leaving only gold. There are still huge amounts of free mercury in the beds of streams running off the Sierra into the Sacramento.

As you say, once the mercury is underwater and away from free oxygen, bacteria absorb it and pass it up through the food chain. Result: if you catch fish in S.F. Bay be careful about how many you eat!

Mercury, like all heavy metals, is toxic stuff. It's pretty certain the Roman aristocracy went downhill mentally from the combination of inbreeding and the use of lead plumbing and dinnerware. A huge source of dangerous environmental mercury is from discarded flashlight batteries. Naturally Congress won't do anything about that because it would be terribly unpopular.

90 posted on 09/10/2002 12:44:54 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
17 tons of mercury a year?!?!?! How much mercury is in each thermometers? A quarter ounce? Whats that total in thermomerters? Has to be in the TRILLIONS!

If each thermometer had 1/10 oz mercury, 17 tons would be enough to make 5,440,000 thermometers; at 1/4 oz, 2,176,000 thermometers.
91 posted on 09/10/2002 12:46:50 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tony Niar Brain
That is absolutely untrue. Metallic mercury is extremely insoluble (does NOT dissolve)in water lake or otherwise. In fact metallic mercury is so heavy if poured into a lake will bury itself deeply in the mud and can stay that way for a hundred years. People like yourself with NO specific knowledge of mercury are spreading these unbelieveable assertions. Those in teh know realize when people speak of contaminating grounwater it is methyl mercury NOT the metallic mercury in thermometers. I work with it everyday.

Lurking'
92 posted on 09/10/2002 12:46:57 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98
You're right. Pure metallic mercury would sink right to the bottom of the lake and beyond. Only methyl mercury is dangerous when it finds a body of water.

...

Except for the fact that most of the metallic mecury would then react and turn into methyl mercury, Mr. Chemistry Ph.D.

Here's my source in case you still think me full of it.

93 posted on 09/10/2002 1:02:43 PM PDT by Tony Niar Brain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
This is how they are protecting us? Priorities, go figure.

Hey, they could have federalized temperature-taking!

-PJ

94 posted on 09/10/2002 1:04:33 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe; MRAR15Guy56
There's 453 grams of mercury in ONE POUND...
They were hoping no one would be able to do the math.

There are 453.592 grams per pound.
It is traditional to round UP to 454 grams.

Just being picky. ;^)

95 posted on 09/10/2002 1:12:23 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: VOYAGER; UCANSEE2
Who needs these airheads disrupting the national life with their frivolously silly ideas?

I wouldn't be surprised if UCANSEE2 in #85 nailed it on the head.

Interestingly, I got a call today from a colleague about a situation where a competitor of my employer's might be about to pull a similar stunt -- to get his congressman involved in a way where their products would be preferred (for government purchase) over ours. Heh. My congresswoman already knows me personally.

96 posted on 09/10/2002 1:14:12 PM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
If you really want to get picky - 453.59237 grams. ;^)
97 posted on 09/10/2002 1:19:23 PM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
> For starters, mercury could not be 'solid waste' for the simple reason that it is a LIQUID. <

Sounds reasonable, but you're wrong. All hazardous wastes are defined by law to be "solid" wastes. So things like mercury, xylene, MEK, [name your favorite solvent] are all "solid" wastes. By definition.


98 posted on 09/10/2002 1:23:10 PM PDT by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
YOU SMART BOY!

. A huge source of dangerous environmental mercury is from discarded flashlight batteries. Naturally Congress won't do anything about that because it would be terribly unpopular.

EPA banned ASBESTOS in SCHOOLS and forced them to replace it all at huge costs.

This was because it was 'possible' that the friable asbestos could become jarred loose from basketballs hitting it.

When I asked officials at EPA why then did they not do anything about ASBESTOS BRAKE PADS AND LININGS which are on every auto and grind the asbestos into very fine particles which we all breathe in every day, I got the same answer, more or less. It would be very unpopular. It would cost individuals to replace them, and the CAR MFGTRS would SH*T a BRICK!

99 posted on 09/10/2002 1:24:44 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: jaime1959
All hazardous wastes are defined by law to be "solid" wastes.

Makes sense to me. No complaints here.

100 posted on 09/10/2002 1:24:54 PM PDT by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson