Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi royal family pays 'protection money' to bin-Laden
Jerusalem Post ^ | Aug. 25, 2002 | DOUGLAS DAVIS

Posted on 08/24/2002 9:56:15 PM PDT by GaryMontana

LONDON - Senior members of the Saudi royal family paid "protection money" totaling at least $300 million to Osama bin-Laden and the Taliban to prevent them from attacking targets in Saudi Arabia, the London Sunday Times reported yesterday.

The revelation, based on extensive investigations, was contained in papers filed in a $3,000 billion US lawsuit by lawyers representing the families of Sept. 11 victims.

According to the documents, the deal was struck after two secret meetings involving members of the Saudi royal family and al-Qaida leaders, including bin-Laden.

The cash enabled al-Qaida to fund training camps in Afghanistan that are said to have been attended by the Sept. 11 bombers.

The court documents reveal that the agreement committed bin- Laden not to use his forces to subvert the Saudi government, while the Saudis agreed to ensure that requests to extradite al- Qaida members and demands to close al-Qaida training camps were not carried out.

In addition, the Saudis agreed to supply oil and financial assistance to both the Taliban and Pakistan which, the documents report, was worth "several hundred millions" of dollars.

The revelations resulting from the investigation are likely to exacerbate already tense relations between the US and Saudi Arabia, which one analyst at the Washington-based Rand think-tank recently described at a Pentagon briefing as the "kernel of evil."

The document names the Saudi royals involved in the deal and provides details about the network of charities and businesses through which bin- Laden raised money.

The documents say the Saudi princes were informed about attacks by Islamic fundamentalists on American servicemen at a US army training facility in Riyadh in November 1995 and at the Khobar Towers barracks in June 1996, in which 19 US airmen died.

The princes decided to strike a deal with bin-Laden because they feared that al-Qaida, which opposed the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia, would show its displeasure by attempting to destabilize the kingdom.

The documents say Saudi Arabia's secret service, the Istakhbarat, had decided in late 1995 to fund the Taliban and the initial decision to pay bin-Laden "protection money" was agreed at a meeting of the Saudi princes in 1996.

A further meeting in the Afghan city of Kandahar in July 1998 led to the deal between Saudi Arabia and the Taliban.

According to the documents, those present included Prince Turki al-Faisal al-Saud, then chief of the Istakhbarat, Taliban leaders, senior officers from Pakistan's secret service and bin- Laden.

Turki was said to have known bin-Laden well through family connections and also because he had hand-picked bin-Laden in the early 1980s to organize Arab volunteers who were fighting Soviet troops in Afghanistan.

The lawsuit also alleges that the Saudi royal family supported charities with close ties to bin-Laden, including a $6 million gift from Saudi Defense Minister Prince Sultan, to the International Islamic Relief Organization, al-Haramain, the Muslim World League and the World Assembly of Muslim Youth.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bribes; evilopeckerprinces; exportingterrorism; fatah; fatahiscrap; fundingalqaeda; gazafirstdisaster; hamas; hamasiscrap; hebrewuniversity; islamakazis; islamakaziwahhabi; israel; jihadiscrap; killallislamakazis; liberalpolicitians; medievalmonarchy; middleeast; money; muslimworldleague; opecequalterrorism; opeckerislamakazis; opeckerprinces; opecoilterrorism; opecterrorexport; osamabindead; osamabinladen; oslodelusionkills; palestinian; palestinians; philippines; radicalislam; radicalislamakazis; samialarian; saudi; saudiarabia; saudideathcults; saudienemies; saudiislamakazis; saudisequalnazis; saudispayhamas; saudispushterror; september11; stabintheback; sueopeckerprinces; suv; terror; terrorism; terrorist; usf; wahhabideathcult; wahhabiislamakazis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: GaryMontana
Thanks for posting this.

The following cartoon by Oliphant says all that needs to be said about the reality of the Saudis to the US.

Time to Kick their A$$ and take their gas!


61 posted on 08/25/2002 8:35:19 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Isn't Bush hosting Prince Bandar at the ranch this coming week? Love to be a fly on the wall at that meeting...
62 posted on 08/25/2002 8:40:16 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: All
Here is the Drudge Report on this as based on the Sunday Times of London: (Vile/evil Opecker Princes big time funders of world terrorism link)
63 posted on 08/25/2002 8:41:45 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GaryMontana; Miss Marple; hchutch; Shermy; Ernest_at_the_Beach
I have absolutely no proof on this, however, I have to wonder if the Vile/Evil Opecker Princes tried 2 times to cause a full panic on our stock market.

Go to any financial site that has chart plotting capabilities. Enter in DIA,QQQ, and SPY these are the symbols for the stock funds which represent the Dow Jones, Nasdaq 100 and the S&P 500 funds.

Set the chart to go back 2 years. Besides the obvious deep drop in value of 9/11 what caused the huge dips in May-August of 2001 and May-July 2002?

The drop in value of May-July of this year was basically the same as the 9/11 drop.

Did the vile/evil Opecker Princes try to crash our stock market on two different time periods one year apart?

I don't know, but it would not surprise me.

64 posted on 08/25/2002 8:49:31 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I think that you are right. There has been some change in the Opecker Prince's behavior since the last meeting.

If we have this data, what does GW have for this meeting?

A friend who lived many years in the middle east recently asked an interesting question.

What if this prince and some of the younger princes really despise the al qaeda and Wahhabi fringes and would like to Saudi Arabia and the rest of the middle east free from the Wahhabi Islamakazi agendas? If they take a standagainst the Wahhabie Lunatics now, they and their family would be dead in 24 hours. What secret deals could they be working out with GW to rid their country of the al Qaeda thugs and the Wahhabi Lunatics.

No one has any ideal of what this prince and GW discussed in the privacy of GW's F250 Four Wheel Drive Pickup with just the two of them by theirselves on the last visit. GW knows we have as many enemies in our state department as in the Middle East.

So any real heart to heart discussions will have to happen on a one to one basis without anyone else there to massage and manuever the discussions between these two.

Like you, I would love to be a speck on the walls of the ranch and particuliarly in the Ford Pickup to hear what is being said.
65 posted on 08/25/2002 9:10:04 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
to keep the oil flowing :)

LOL! I just saw the smiley!

You are right about the arm twisting! The Saudis won't get off their sandy asses, so we are turning up the heat via the foreign press. This is my guess.

We could use the Saudis to get the Iraq project done. It would be alot harder without them.

66 posted on 08/25/2002 9:29:24 AM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
I think the US government should look into your theory.

I am sure that there is something to it.

Gary
67 posted on 08/25/2002 10:33:26 AM PDT by GaryMontana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GaryMontana
Time to seize Saudi Arabian oil fields to pay for the 9/11 disaster.... >

This is an idea whose time has come.

1) Declare war on Saudi Arabia.

2) Invade SA and place their country under martial law.

3) Confiscate the asssets of the "royal family" to pay for the costs of the occupation.

4) Hold military trials for anyone complicit in supporting international terrorism and swiftly mete out the appropriate penalties, preferably death by hanging in the public square of the individual's home town.

5) Confiscate enough of their oil revenues to pay for the costs of 9-11 and the ensuing war on Saudi-inspired and supported Whabbi terror organizations.

6) Divide the country into ethnically stable regions, and permit the people of each regions to elect their own government, subject to a caveat that they will continue to sell oil into the world markets at market prices. Offer incentives to them for creating representative constitutional governments.

7) Each region will cede under 250 year lease whatever land is necessary for the USA to maintain an effective deterrent military force in that region.

8) The penalty for any terrrorist actions will be death by hanging of the terrorist within 48 hours of conviction and one appeal before a military court. Any direct suppoprters of the terrorist get the same penalty. Indirect supporters will be subject to confiscation of their assets and life imprisonment.

That's about it. Later.

68 posted on 08/25/2002 11:28:03 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryMontana
We need to conquer that country and execute its ruling class. The remaining population can then be MTVized.
69 posted on 08/25/2002 11:32:01 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gPal
War with Iraq may be unnecassary war with Saudi Arabia is neccasary.
70 posted on 08/25/2002 11:33:17 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34
I heard the Saudis had about 600 billion dollars in the U.S. Is that why we do not go after them?

Yes.

71 posted on 08/25/2002 11:33:42 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Basically I agree but I would discourage Democracy. The West thrives in spite of Democracy not because of it after destroying the Saud family I'd appoint secular minded kings.
72 posted on 08/25/2002 11:35:03 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
BTW instead of hanging they should be boiled in lard.
73 posted on 08/25/2002 11:35:32 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: gPal
what the hell is wrong with colin powell...he must get on board or go ahead and resign...or the president should fire him

Powell HAS been fairly subdued lately, has he not? Although the pressitudes ARE putting on the full-court press trying to derail the Bush admin's focus on Iraq. Probably the adminiistration has a lot of evidence pointing to Iraq AND Saudi Arabia. The question is, regarding Iraq, will we present the evidence before or after we attack?

74 posted on 08/25/2002 11:39:23 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: crazykatz
The money that they have in the USA should be frozen...

Only problem is, this would jeapardize investment in US companies. One reason for our great success and wealth is that our system of laws helps to create a stable environment for business and investment. We really don't want to risk that. There are many ways to go after these cowardly bastards.

76 posted on 08/25/2002 11:44:06 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
If you think that CIA and the Bush-Clinton governments didn't know anything about this...think again. They probably knew all of the details and simply looked the other way. Each time that Bin Laden hit the US...never once did we approach the Saudis about the issue of Saudi support. The answer that the American public should show now...is to tell the Saudis we won't buy their oil, and start courting Mexico and Colombia for oil rights.
77 posted on 08/25/2002 11:44:21 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
Agreed but, why is the left embracing these freaks?

Reason #1 - Stupidity. Reason #2 - The leftist who still have not destroyed their brains with drugs are being herded into believing this is all about america trying to control the worlds oil supply. Reason #3 - Then there is the conspiratorial left who blames jewish cabals with attempting to control the US and to get the US to fight their wars for them. These paranoid and dellusional leftist actually think the US Jewish Cabal was somehow responsible for the attacks on 9/11.

While spining the tuner on my radio a few nights ago I heard a liberal caller state on a talk radio show that 'only the military could have done what happened on 9/11'. That kind of thought is pure lunacy. And perhaps Reason #4 - Lunacy.

78 posted on 08/25/2002 12:19:59 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson