Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hannity Blasts FreeRepublic (maybe he is right)
Radio | Sean Hannity

Posted on 08/02/2002 2:40:49 PM PDT by jbstrick

Hannity just stated on his radio show that he has just about had enough of the conservative cannibals on this board. To many threads end up being ledd about news and information and more about attacking fellow conservatives.

He said if he wants to get attacked he will go to a Liberal board.

I have a tendency to agree...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Editorial; Extended News; Free Republic; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: freerepublic; hannity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 901-911 next last
To: Texasforever
Never mind, I thought you were referring to someone else.
561 posted on 08/02/2002 10:29:58 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
So what is the real reason that you come to this volunteer site .. ?

With FReegards to internet laws , what is the differential between the republic of America and those that you find in the once enchanting U.K. ?

562 posted on 08/02/2002 10:30:31 PM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
" I don't even know what you are referring to. Please stop with the conspiracy theories."

Sorry Beckie, let me try to help you, I guess you forgot what you posted with the last 20 posts

"To: A Citizen Reporter This thread isn't about Larry. 545 posted on 8/3/02 12:15 AM Central by FreedominJesusChrist"

563 posted on 08/02/2002 10:30:53 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
There are a whole lot more civilized ways to get one's point across and to argue a side of a discussion without resorting to nastiness.

This is true. It is unfortunate a significant number of Freepers have begun resorting to this type of behavior when they attempt to argue emotion-laden issues. Many of us have been flamed in this regard at one time or another. But I haven't seen too many anti-Hannity comments of this nature, so can only presume Sean is criticizing Freepers who criticize other republicans.

My question is this: Are we simply suppose to accept the administration, or GOP, "line" on everything? Bill O'Reilly as a tendency to trash anyone who disagrees with him at all. Does Sean think this is appealing? In my opinion, it is not.

There is a big difference between blindly trashing groups of people( i.e., freepers, "The Christian Right, "Fox News" "Bushbots") and pointing out specific instances of "wrongdoing." Can't think of any other word. Nobody, including GWB or Sean Hannity,is perfect.

On FR, we simply like to discuss who is simply screwing up and who is trying to screw us. It's not always that easy to determine. If all we did was commend George W and his crew, nobody would visit and FR would soon be out of business. The same thing would happen at Fox News.

Sean, baby, YOU'RE A TALKSHOW HOST. GROW UP!!!!! YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM A LOT OF IDIOTS.

Trashing, or ignoring other conservatives isn't going to work. Nobody (or at least very few) ever died from trying to hold an intellectual conversation. But a lot of people remained ignorant and got in trouble (Judas included) for walking out of the room too soon. Hang in there, Sean, and all the rest, and have hope. It'll never be perfect, but there are loads of us (conservatives) out here, even though we're all very different. And our day will come again.

564 posted on 08/02/2002 10:31:46 PM PDT by glorygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies]

To: Torie
and the perceived way to get them up?

There ya go with that sex talk again.

565 posted on 08/02/2002 10:32:01 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Some of us oldies but goodies still have some firepower.
566 posted on 08/02/2002 10:33:41 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: jbstrick
I also agree with Hannity.
567 posted on 08/02/2002 10:34:22 PM PDT by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Some of us oldies but goodies still have some firepower.

Well I am down to oral sex. I just talk about it a lot.

568 posted on 08/02/2002 10:35:35 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
You know, oral sex is illegal in Wisconsin.
569 posted on 08/02/2002 10:38:00 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: Patriot
Leadership founding member bump . " We need to attack the ones that are destroying America " .

Add me to YOUR ping list .

570 posted on 08/02/2002 10:38:11 PM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: dorben
****Umm ,
I know that I am late here , but is this the best time to bring up the observation of south FLA driving habits ? Damn man ,

If people are going to drop 30 - 50 k into a car , what the hell does it cost to use a RAT blinker ?

I'm 5'7 , green eyes .. classy . blond . ooopp 's ... Soweyy -). Hey , it's that guy . I never did that . Honest .****

I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
571 posted on 08/02/2002 10:38:28 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter; Texasforever
Perhaps you've forgotten how dangerous the Clinton years were: The arrests, persecutions and beatings of lawful demonstrators, the IRS being sicced on just about every conservative organization that criticized the Clintons, the demonization and attempts to silence broadcasters like Rush, the death threats (backed up by the Body Count), the blackmail, the private investigators dishing dirt and making threats, the attempts to ruin reputations via the press and on and on.

Yeah, it didn't take any guts to take on the Clintons. Just ask Trent Lott, he was cheerleading the charge, remember?

572 posted on 08/02/2002 10:39:54 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
You know, oral sex is illegal in Wisconsin.

They are just protrecting their cows.

573 posted on 08/02/2002 10:39:56 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Ya I got that message in high school. I ignored it, along with attendant messages, and in the meantime had a blast. Somehow most of us survived it all. We are still here after all!
574 posted on 08/02/2002 10:39:58 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: jbstrick
I like Hannity. When he said that tonight, I hoped that I heard him wrong.

This is a sad day for FR. And, it’s a wake-up call for all of us to do some soul searching for what cause we are serve with our posts here on Free Republic.

Fellow Freepers, let’s keep it the best site on the Internet.
575 posted on 08/02/2002 10:40:10 PM PDT by Barnacle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Well, I know that it's an actual law, because my good friend's dad told me, and he's a judge.
576 posted on 08/02/2002 10:41:22 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I mainly adhere to sexual abstinence for religious reasons and I believe that God made those rules with our best interest in mind.

It's just one of my convictions and the way of life that gives me peace.

577 posted on 08/02/2002 10:46:16 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
the IRS being sicced on just about every conservative organization that criticized the Clintons, the demonization and attempts to silence broadcasters like Rush, the death threats (backed up by the Body Count), the blackmail, the private investigators dishing dirt and making threats, the attempts to ruin reputations via the press and on and on.

So Rush Limbaugh became a VERY RICH man taking on Clinton and is still around, albeit struggling with how to keep his audience stirred up, was at Risk too? Damn give me that risk any day. How is a minor columnist/attorney more at "risk" than a man that had millions of listeners? I was audited twice in the 90’s and I was an outspoken critic of Clinton. Connect the dots.

578 posted on 08/02/2002 10:48:44 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
I don't quarrel with that. It is just that in my opinion, human beings are resilient, and there are many paths one can take, and still find success and happiness in a way consistent with being a reasonably decent person. In that sense, maybe I am a hopeless liberal.
579 posted on 08/02/2002 10:50:23 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
illegal in Wisconsin

Lol and you would know!
580 posted on 08/02/2002 10:51:43 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 901-911 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson