Skip to comments.
Bugs: The Best Witnesses? (Westerfield's Son Neal Forced To Testify By Desperate D.A. Dusek!!)
Court TV ^
| July 25, 2002
| Harriet Ryan
Posted on 07/24/2002 10:44:59 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,481-1,500 next last
To: fatima
The WAY underage porn and child rape stuff was hidden among DWs business "Spectrum" files using DWs titling and passwords, it may or may not have ever been seen by Neil, but it was downloaded and filed and titled and hidden by DW. The computer guy yesterday was crystal clear on that.
To: CAPPSMADNESS
There is a million miles between Playboy and
VIOLENT CHILD RAPE PICTURES AND MOVIE CLIPS. You might as well compare cider to crack cocaine or heroin.
To: crystalk
Do you really think they will? I don't. I have absolutely NO confidence that SDPD/DA will look into any of the other evidence or run anything through any kind of data base.
If they jury hangs they will make sure David loses Feldman as his attorney, as he's indigent now. So he'll get some pd.
If he is acquitted, LE and the media will rant about how stupid the jury is.
43
posted on
07/25/2002 7:49:25 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Travis McGee
"You might as well compare cider to crack cocaine or heroin"
Uh Oh....... you mean I should look for these too?
sigh.......
BRB.......
To: pyx
I understand fully that only kiddie porn and murder are at the moment formally charged against DW, not sexual assault or molestation.
I am looking at the big picture, making a guess based upon all I know, as to what the likelihood is that various parties are in fact guilty of anything, whether yet charged or not.
Whoever killed this girl, violently hated her and killed her in a brutal manner, not consistent with mere sexual assault. Nor would DW, surely, have had any reason to murder her at all, much less brutally...his alleged pedophilia might argue why he may have sexually assaulted her, but that is not charged! It goes nowhere at all to explain why he would MURDER her, much less with the teeth being knocked out and other brutal and mutilating complications.
45
posted on
07/25/2002 7:53:41 AM PDT
by
crystalk
To: Yeti
Again, with a CD full of porn, and only one "questionable" avi, you have to wonder if DW knew it was among the stuff. Neal didn't see it.You must not have heard the computer guy yesterday. The VIOLENT CHILD RAPE stuff was clearly hidden among DWs "Spectrum" business files ("AttacK" 01 to 06 etc) using the same titling and formatting that DW used for his everyday stuff. HE reformatted, titled and hid it, it was not some "automatic download" stuff that he was unaware of.
And the computer guy said that these "Attack" files had been deleted, time of attempted deletion uncertain, but that he had been able to recover them. It's not so easy to scrub a computer clean, although DW tried!
Put down the DW cool aid, and smell the coffee. How many of YOUR friends download VIOLENT CHILD RAPE PORN??
To: Travis McGee
Why is this so BRILLANT?
The maggots were the only witnesses to what happened to Danielle's body after she disappeared.
sw
47
posted on
07/25/2002 7:57:37 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: CAPPSMADNESS
No. It means that Playboy (tasteful nude pictures of adult women with NO "Hustler" style gynecology shots) is in no way comparable to pictures and video clips of SMALL CHILDREN BEING HELD DOWN AND GANG RAPED SCREAMING AND CRYING, which is what DW found somewhere on the net, downloaded, and hid ("Attack 01-06 etc) among his normal business files using his own formatting, titles, codes etc.
No "innocent accidental download" IOW. That stuff, which is SUPER ILLEGAL, is not just sent out by legal porn companies. Devotees of CHILD RAPE need to really search it out.
To: Travis McGee
Travis, do you realize that there isn't ONE forensic psychologist who can link watching Porn, albeit disgusting, to rape/murder?
If they could, we'd see one on the stand.
This may be the first case in US history, that convicts someone of Murder with the PORN Motive as an instignator.
sw
49
posted on
07/25/2002 8:01:02 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: Yeti
50
posted on
07/25/2002 8:02:22 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Jaded
Are you suggesting Feldman will abandon DW because the latter has no more money to pay him?
Such would not only be a ratty thing to do, it would actually be unusual in similar circumstances.
I fully expect Feldman to remain active on DW behalf and to file appeals desperately against any guilty verdict, work that will exceed very quickly what he has ALREADY done, let me tell you. Yet as you say it is doubtful he will be paid any more for that than he has already received.
How can you be so certain Feldman is a louse? I will bet against you and say he isn't. We will see who is right.
51
posted on
07/25/2002 8:02:53 AM PDT
by
crystalk
To: crystalk
Whoever killed this girl, violently hated her and killed her in a brutal manner, not consistent with mere sexual assault. How do you know ANY of that? Danielle's mummified, bug and wild animal eaten body reveals NONE of that. What is certain is that DW collected rare illegal VIOLENT CHILD RAPE PICTURES AND CLIPS and hid them on his computers.
I suspect that if one VIOLENTLY RAPES A 7 YEAR OLD CHILD, one pretty much kills her.
But since her lower areas were eaten by wild animals, we'll never know.
To: Yeti; UCANSEE2; BunnySlippers; CAPPSMADNESS; cyncooper; Valpal1; Amore
yeti, I've never had a reason to believe that you were anything but sincere in your posts. You've always been respectful as the majority of the people on the threads are. My response to your post is not meant for you to take it personal...I have to ask you..tattle about "what"? I did not complain about the bitch is back song, I haven't clicked the abuse button on fresno since MARCH.. (but there were A LOT of abuse button HITS back then by LOTS of people because the threads were battle grounds, period). I DID click it on the post where *I* was accused of raping the victim a few days ago. SO WHAT. The little song and dance about being a tattle tale and censor is bs.I HAVE NEVER tried to censor the subject matter of the thread or posts and if ya don't believe me I give jim rob and the admin mod permission to confirm this. However, If someone says something extremely personal, like the one about me raping a victim, (only one person was so called tattled on and the extremely offensive post WAS removed--) I'll click it again. How often do you think I was accused of clicking it though? It is laughable...If lies are spread and told enough, people tend to start believing them..but I'm sure you knew that. Talk about childish games..wasting an entire thread making sure everyone knows that one thinks the "opposing" debate members are stalkers and blowflies has got to one of the most IMMATURE acts I've seen on FR. It forces us to say OK....these people are distracting the tone of the thread with their stupid angry bs and then expect everyone to just treat them as if they are "maturer older adults" who have the wisdom that comes with age. HA. Maybe you can explain WHY they start the thread with articles, and then attacks with their stupid song parody? There is no LOGICAL explanation. Maybe you can explain how many posts have been removed by the mods?????
To: crystalk
The problem as i see it is.....If DW did it....we'll never know for sure because the Prosecution is so inept. If they truely believe he did it (i believe they do) they should have SLOWLY, meticuously built a case against him, BEFORE they charged him.....as it is...he may get off. I am not sure if he did it or not....whether found guilty or innocent we will NEVER know for sure they got the right guy.
From where i sit....and it is along way from the jury box....i would have to vote NOT GUILTY due to the poor case that the DA has presented.....Unless the 3rd bug guy can change my mind......
54
posted on
07/25/2002 8:06:08 AM PDT
by
is_is
To: spectre
Whoops.."instigator"..sic.
55
posted on
07/25/2002 8:06:18 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: Travis McGee
What about the knocking out of the teeth? You think DW did that? It wasn't a coyote, let me tell you.
56
posted on
07/25/2002 8:06:58 AM PDT
by
crystalk
Comment #57 Removed by Moderator
To: is_is
You are right, II. If everyone who had touched this matter was as ethical and conscientious as you, we wouldn't be where we are now.
58
posted on
07/25/2002 8:08:48 AM PDT
by
crystalk
To: spectre; All
Put down the DW Cool Aid for a minute.
You honestly believe that DW is just a typical normal run-of-the-mill VIOLENT CHILD RAPE VIDEO COLLECTOR who just "happened" to have Danielle's blood, fingerprints, hair and fibers in his Rv?
Folks that can believe that also believe that OJ is innocent and we never went to the moon.
Ta Ta Folks, enjoy your DW Cool Aid.
To: basscleff
I nominate Al Pacino to play Feldman.
We meet same time, same place :~)
sw
60
posted on
07/25/2002 8:12:40 AM PDT
by
spectre
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,481-1,500 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson