Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yeti
Again, with a CD full of porn, and only one "questionable" avi, you have to wonder if DW knew it was among the stuff. Neal didn't see it.

You must not have heard the computer guy yesterday. The VIOLENT CHILD RAPE stuff was clearly hidden among DWs "Spectrum" business files ("AttacK" 01 to 06 etc) using the same titling and formatting that DW used for his everyday stuff. HE reformatted, titled and hid it, it was not some "automatic download" stuff that he was unaware of.

And the computer guy said that these "Attack" files had been deleted, time of attempted deletion uncertain, but that he had been able to recover them. It's not so easy to scrub a computer clean, although DW tried!

Put down the DW cool aid, and smell the coffee. How many of YOUR friends download VIOLENT CHILD RAPE PORN??

46 posted on 07/25/2002 7:54:38 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee
Travis, do you realize that there isn't ONE forensic psychologist who can link watching Porn, albeit disgusting, to rape/murder?

If they could, we'd see one on the stand.

This may be the first case in US history, that convicts someone of Murder with the PORN Motive as an instignator.

sw

49 posted on 07/25/2002 8:01:02 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee
HE reformatted, titled and hid it, it was not some "automatic download" stuff that he was unaware of.

You just don't get it. If the CDs were merely backups of the hard drive, the backup would transfer all the folders and sub-folders. Did the prosecution ever point out that the only stuff on the CDs was porn? If so, your argument has much more merit, but if not then they could just be backups that would reflect the way he organized his hard drive.

And the computer guy said that these "Attack" files had been deleted, time of attempted deletion uncertain, but that he had been able to recover them. It's not so easy to scrub a computer clean, although DW tried!

That actually cuts both ways -- DW could have just as easily deleted the files out of disgust once he saw what they were. The fact that they were named "attack" doesn't necessarily mean anything, people who post porn online use all sorts of weird titles for file names.

74 posted on 07/25/2002 8:41:57 AM PDT by Stiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee
And the computer guy said that these "Attack" [child porn] files had been deleted, time of attempted deletion uncertain, but that he had been able to recover them.

Attempts to delete porn files seems to indicate to me that whoever viewed them decided they did not want them. In short, they decided they DID NOT WANT TO KEEP CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.
553 posted on 07/25/2002 2:05:58 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee
>>>Put down the DW cool aid, and smell the coffee.<<<

LOL!

1,167 posted on 07/26/2002 3:57:57 AM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson