I am looking at the big picture, making a guess based upon all I know, as to what the likelihood is that various parties are in fact guilty of anything, whether yet charged or not.
Whoever killed this girl, violently hated her and killed her in a brutal manner, not consistent with mere sexual assault. Nor would DW, surely, have had any reason to murder her at all, much less brutally...his alleged pedophilia might argue why he may have sexually assaulted her, but that is not charged! It goes nowhere at all to explain why he would MURDER her, much less with the teeth being knocked out and other brutal and mutilating complications.
How do you know ANY of that? Danielle's mummified, bug and wild animal eaten body reveals NONE of that. What is certain is that DW collected rare illegal VIOLENT CHILD RAPE PICTURES AND CLIPS and hid them on his computers.
I suspect that if one VIOLENTLY RAPES A 7 YEAR OLD CHILD, one pretty much kills her.
But since her lower areas were eaten by wild animals, we'll never know.
From where i sit....and it is along way from the jury box....i would have to vote NOT GUILTY due to the poor case that the DA has presented.....Unless the 3rd bug guy can change my mind......