Replies

No. It means that Playboy (tasteful nude pictures of adult women with NO "Hustler" style gynecology shots) is in no way comparable to pictures and video clips of SMALL CHILDREN BEING HELD DOWN AND GANG RAPED SCREAMING AND CRYING, which is what DW found somewhere on the net, downloaded, and hid ("Attack 01-06 etc) among his normal business files using his own formatting, titles, codes etc.

No "innocent accidental download" IOW. That stuff, which is SUPER ILLEGAL, is not just sent out by legal porn companies. Devotees of CHILD RAPE need to really search it out.

Travis, you are wrong about devotees of child rape needing to Really search it out. I have been very active in the protest of child porn and rape videos for 4 years now, it is on just about every porn site and if it isn't, rest assured a link is.

I have worked with numerous organizations in the state of Ohio to stop this very thing. Last year, HBO showed the actual rape of a woman, taped on her own camcorder when the perp broke in, on one of their late night programs. It was very graphic and NOTHING was edited out.

I had to stop my children from surfing the web in search of Dragon Ball Z information because I saw that alot of these web sites lead to anime sites that lead to porn anime sites that lead to porn sites.

Visit Winmx sometime and do a search for porn or XXX videos - you will be shocked at the number of child porn videos and rape videos that are being shared.

I might also add that many of these pictures/videos are often labled as something else - and only found out about after you open the file.

video clips of SMALL CHILDREN BEING HELD DOWN AND GANG RAPED SCREAMING AND CRYING, which is what DW found somewhere on the net

When has it actually been stated by either of the attorneys that the photos involved "small children"?