You honestly believe that DW is just a typical normal run-of-the-mill VIOLENT CHILD RAPE VIDEO COLLECTOR who just "happened" to have Danielle's blood, fingerprints, hair and fibers in his Rv?
Folks that can believe that also believe that OJ is innocent and we never went to the moon.
Ta Ta Folks, enjoy your DW Cool Aid.
What ashame we can't carry on a civil conversation...too bad, I really would have liked that.
sw
All the above MAY be true......BUT.....it DOES NOT automatically make him the killer.....The prosecution screwed this case up by not PROVING how the blood got there....how (and this is BIG for me)DW managed to get her out of her house without leaving ONE piece of evidence.
Someone posted awhile back that the evidence collected against him could have possibly fit many people in the neiborhood. God forbid that one of my neighbors children plays in my house and then goes missing on a weekend i decide to take off on my Harley. I have left many times not knowing exactly where i was going until i got home. Somethings look bad for DW (he may really have done it) but i could not send him to the death gurney because the DA has not removed ALL REASONABLE doubt from my mind. If he did it and gets off, it is the DA's FAULT.......They have built a case on assumptions NOT proof....there are innocent explanations (in the absence of proof)no matter how far fetched, as to how the evidence they have, could have gotten there.
With that said i'd probably have to vote guilty on the kiddie porn charge.
I do not believe that OJ is innocent of complicity in the murders of his ex-wife and Ron Goldman. But neither do I believe that the murders took lace in the manner theorized by the prosecution, and that accordingly, the jury rendered the correct verdict.
As did the ones in the civil trial, and the denial of custody of Nicole's children to one who probably had a hand in the murder of their mother.
-archy-/-