Skip to comments.
SIGN THE PETITION : Set aside the 9th Circuit Court's decision on the Pledge of Allegiance
Petition Online ^
| June 26, 2002
| Jeff Head
Posted on 06/26/2002 2:38:26 PM PDT by Jeff Head
GET THE EMAIL CHAINS ROLLING!
Please sign the following petition to set aside the 9th Circuit Court's Ruling declaring the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional.
SIGN THE PETITION
SET ASIDE THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT'S RULING
The insnaity MUST stop ... we must be the ones to halt it in its tracks.
Pass on to all you know. Family, realitves, friends, neighbors, representatives, teachers, students, etc.
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: authorjeffhead; catholiclist; christianlist; constitution; donutwatch; freespeech; judicialactivism; pledgeofallegiance; religiousfreedom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 981-992 next last
To: Jeff Head
Petition signed and commented. BTTT.
To: Jeff Head
22
posted on
06/26/2002 2:50:27 PM PDT
by
Taxman
To: Jeff Head
This is all very good, but it isn't how the Supreme Court works. If they received an e-mail from every person in the country, it would not change they way the court reaches decisions. We don't get a vote in the judicial branch, only in the legislative and executive branches.
But this is a blessing in disguise, a golden opportunity to 1) Smite the Dems and 2) has given the Supremes an opportunity to rule once and for all that God has a place in our society. The atheists (sorry you all out there, but this is it) can suck lemons. The Supremes will do their thing not because we innundate them with e-mails, but because conservatives have a majority on the Supreme Court and their are Believers among our robed sisters and brothers.
23
posted on
06/26/2002 2:52:02 PM PDT
by
3AngelaD
To: Jeff Head
Done. Thanks Jeff.
24
posted on
06/26/2002 2:53:42 PM PDT
by
epow
To: Jeff Head
Signed and Bumped!
25
posted on
06/26/2002 2:55:27 PM PDT
by
genew
To: Jeff Head
I gladly signed it.
To: Jeff Head
Signed and bumped. There was one comment I particularly liked: "WW2 vet - keep God in our lives."
27
posted on
06/26/2002 2:59:52 PM PDT
by
Lady Jag
To: Jeff Head; Abundy; Action-America; AEMILIUS PAULUS; agenda_express; AGreatPer; Alabama_Wild_Man; ...
heads up!
To: 3AngelaD
The Supremes keep a finger to the wind of public opinion.
29
posted on
06/26/2002 3:03:29 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Jeff Head
Signed the Petition. Also bought your book.
30
posted on
06/26/2002 3:04:22 PM PDT
by
Phaedrus
To: Jeff Head
Thanks for the ping, Jeff.
Signed and bumped. Never felt better about signing a petition in my life.
GOD bless America!
Leni
To: Jeff Head
I'm #96. Included in the comment field: The judiciary, in particular, and the whole legal system are getting out of hand. Abuses, such as this ruling, endanger the system of laws which should protect the rights granted by the Creator.
32
posted on
06/26/2002 3:05:26 PM PDT
by
Faraday
To: Jeff Head; farmfriend; marsh2; dixiechick2000; Mama_Bear; poet; Grampa Dave; doug from upland; ...
Signed
#108 with addendum.
Ping for a clear voice for freedom. Thank you, Jeff.
33
posted on
06/26/2002 3:11:08 PM PDT
by
brityank
To: 3AngelaD; All
Mr. Dutchess (an attorney) said that the decision was made by a 3 judge panel of a 7 member court (and the decision was NOT unanimous). The next step is for the "appellant" (or loser in this case) to file an appeal within 10 days. It's called an "en blanc" or request for reconsideration to go before the full seven member court. One would think that with all the criticism they might overturn the decision.
That being said, Mr. says that the 9th district is one of the worst for asinine decisions so the full court might let this one fly.
34
posted on
06/26/2002 3:15:22 PM PDT
by
dutchess
To: brityank; christine11
My wife & I signed it... let's hope it does some good.
35
posted on
06/26/2002 3:15:23 PM PDT
by
backhoe
To: anniegetyourgun; rintense; Mo1; All
Mr. Dutchess (an attorney) said that the decision was made by a 3 judge panel of a 7 member court (and the decision was NOT unanimous). The next step is for the "appellant" (or loser in this case) to file an appeal within 10 days. It's called an "en blanc" or request for reconsideration to go before the full seven member court. One would think that with all the criticism they might overturn the decision.
That being said, Mr. says that the 9th district is one of the worst for asinine decisions so the full court might let this one fly.
36
posted on
06/26/2002 3:17:12 PM PDT
by
dutchess
To: Jeff Head
Thank you very much for doing this.
To: Jeff Head
Signed with pride my fellow Anerican.
Thanks for posting!
To: Jeff Head
Signed and sent....This is unbelievable.
39
posted on
06/26/2002 3:21:30 PM PDT
by
zip
To: Freeper Lady
Opps! So upset I spelled American wrong.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 981-992 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson