Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOCTORS EXPOSE US CENTRE FOR DISEASE CONTROL SEX ED SCANDALS & CORRUPTION OF SCHOOL CHILDREN
Family Research Council, News Headlines & The Washington Times ^ | 4/15/2002 | re report by Physicians Consortium & Robert Stacey McCain

Posted on 04/17/2002 12:16:55 PM PDT by RWBaral

I. FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, News Headline Retrieved: "Physician's Consortium-Sexual Messages in Govenment-Promoted Progrqams"

Story: The Centres for Disease Control (CDC) is using taxpayer dollare to promote explicit and graphic "comprehensive sex education" curriculum for teenage consumption, according to a Physician's Consortium report released April 10. "Sexual Messages in GOvernment-Promoted Programs" describes the kind of messages and activities included in CDC-sponsored programs, some of which are promoted as "abstinence-plus."

The Consortium's findings were egregious enough that researchers preparing the report for publication found it necessary to warn readers sardonically that "the content of the enclosed report is intended for teens and may be too explicit for adults." Because of the sensitive nature of the report's contents, FRC has chosed to post only the introductory summary of the report.

To obtain a copy of the full report, contact the FRD Press Office at (202)-393-2100.

FIRST PAGE ONLY OF PHYSICIANS CONSORTIUM REPORT, "SEXUAL MESSAGES IN GOVERNMENT-PROMOTED PROGRAMS AND TODAY'S YOUTH CULTURE:

While it is safe to say that most parents have the desire to raise health, well-informed young adults, it is likely that a great nuymber of them would be shocked if they know what was actually being taught to their children. In a review of the various "CDC Programs That Work," it was found that the concept of abstinence was typically only briefly mentioned, if at all.

Many "Programs That Work" promoted by the CDC have been referred to as "Abstinence-Puls" or "Abstinence-Based" education. Despite this benign name, a review of many "Abstinence-Plus" programs seem to be only thinly-disguised "safe sex" programs preoccupied with promoting condom use among young people.

In the typical "Abstinence-Plus" program, students are required to go to the store to find condoms, learn about lubricants (including "grape jelly, maple syrup and honey,"), and brainstorm "ways tomake condoms fun and pleasurable" (such as planning a special day when they can experiment). In tyhe classroom, students practice using condoms by unrolling them on items such as cucumbers or dildoes. The implicit message in most of these programs is that sexual activity by young people is both expected and accepted by society.

Abstinence is the only practical and safe way to prevent the sexually transmitted diseases and non-marital pregnancy epidemics. In the pages that follow, it can be seen that the information currently being taught to the young people in our society, whether in schools, outside programs or via teen websites and magazines, does a great disservice to the cause of protecting this generation from physical and emotional harm. --------------------------------------------------------- II. "CDC links to pro-sex teen site (blackline-small.gif)," by Robert Stacy McCain, THE WASHINGTON

A Federal web site features a link to the internet pages of "pro-sex" activists who provice teenagers with explicit advice about homosexuality, sodomy and masturbation.

Listings for "youth" resources on a Centres for Disease Control and PRevention (CDC) site, includes a link to the COaltion for POsitive Sexuality (CPS), a self-described "guerrilla sex education" group.

"If you think you might be queer, relax!" the CPS site urges teens, and offers this suggestion: "If you think you are queer, try to find a lesbian/bisexual/gay/transgender community centre near you, where you can meet other queers your age."

THe CDC site's "youth" links include the Advocates for Youth site, which promotes activism to overturn FEderal abstinence education policies.

A Department of Agriculture spokeswoman said yesterday the department would remove a link to CPS from one of its websites. THat site, www.cyfernet.org, includes "positive youth development" links to the sex advice site Go Ask Alice and to Planned Parenthood's Teenwire site.

"We are in the process of taking down the link to CPS," public affairs specialist Maria BYnum dais yesterday afternoon. "And we will work with the Cyfernet program office and the university partners to review the other sites and determine what the next steps are."

The Federal internet links have come under fire from the Physicians Consortium, a Pennsylvania-based public policy group.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Technical; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cdc; dishonest; government; lies; medicallyinaccurate; negligent; safesex; scandals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: hsmomx3
My sister is married to a priest and they have their kids in govt. schools. They seem to think they're good enough to keep the kids in. No matter how many articles from FR I have sent to her, she still turns the other way. She also feels that her kids need to know how to live in the real world. Like homeschooled kids don't know how? It really makes me want to shake the you know what out of some people and tell them to get a clue. Homeschooling is not good enough for people like her. I know it's not for everyone but there are alternatives to govt. schooling.

Our relatives give us the same song and dance. Meanwhile, of the 9 children (6 of schooling age) that my 3 siblings have produced:

By the sheer Grace and blessing of God, none of my children have any of those issues above (despite the fact that my 12 year old is an unmitigated knucklehead). All three perform WELL above their peer group in the public schools (as adjudged by standardized test scores), both girls are in ballet, one is in piano, my son is learning guitar and self-defense and the TV and/or game machine stays off except on Friday nights and Sat afternoons where Dad or Mom has final say over what is watched/played, and yet, when the adults get together to talk about how the kids are doing, I'M THE WEIRDO for homeschooling/private schooling my kids!!!!

And, I forgot to add, that of COURSE part of the problem according to my family, is that we do, after all, live in a racist society (we are black).
BIG SIGH.
I can't think about it too much or I'll run off a cliff somewhere.

21 posted on 04/17/2002 1:15:31 PM PDT by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
I thought we weren't supposed to call 'em "queer" anymore. Wish they'd make up their damn minds.

It don't matter anyway, they'll never get around to liking what I call 'em...

22 posted on 04/17/2002 1:17:21 PM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Private faith based schools or homeschooling are the only way to go. My children are in a Private Christian school. I am Catholic, but I felt the the Christian school was more compatible with our moral beliefs as a family.

The more I learn about the (governement)public school system, the more happy I am that we made the choice that we did.

23 posted on 04/17/2002 1:19:02 PM PDT by all4one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
Its funny to think that it is "suspect" to NOT let the kids watch whatever they wish to on TV and engage in whatever sort of unsupervised pastimes they choose.

I would think those who fail to monitor the kids consumption of such trash are guilty of child neglect.

24 posted on 04/17/2002 1:25:59 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration; Alamo-girl
FYI

More U.N. subversion.
IMHO
m

25 posted on 04/17/2002 1:26:10 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Parents don't know. They are fed thier info by the DNC propaganda machine...ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN!
26 posted on 04/17/2002 1:41:06 PM PDT by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral; all
Alliance for the Separation of School and State

27 posted on 04/17/2002 1:50:02 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
What every happened to teaching:

1.) Reading/writing
2.) Math
3.) History
4.) Science

People graduate from these schools and can not read/write or even fill out a simple EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION!

But they know how to put on a condom, etc..

This is pitiful.

Where are the "Christians"? They are asleep and a DISGRACE

Franklin


28 posted on 04/17/2002 1:53:45 PM PDT by survivalforum.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: survivalforum.com
Folks, you do have rights and can have your children excused from any inappropriate material. At least in my son's middle school, they are respectful of parents' wishes. Because of more rigorous academic requirements, the previous touchy-feelie semester of "life education" was mercifully replaced with a few days of basic reproduction and gestation in biology class which every 12-year-old should already know.

However, less than 10% of the parents showed up at a preview of this info and one incredible dolt asked "how" they were going to demonstrate the condoms. The teachers just about passed out and the principal said this was an urban legend - never happened in any school she knew about. Parents said they were embarrassed to talk to their kids and wanted the school to do it or at least give them books to give to their kids. Mind you, the school is right next to both the library and Barnes and Noble and all of these are affluent folk with internet access and presumably had sex themselves at least once if they managed to produce a seventh grader. I think this embarrassment/ignorance is the main reason these programs are tolerated despite their proven tendency to increase teen sex. One mom actually asked if kids would be told to abstain. Principal said, "You're the parent. You're going to tell them." Good for her.

29 posted on 04/17/2002 2:16:24 PM PDT by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
And, I forgot to add, that of COURSE part of the problem according to my family, is that we do, after all, live in a racist society (we are black).

I'm glad you brought that up. We're "white", and our homeschooling group has a number of wonderful families . The great part? No one even notices "color". We have some from China as well. We have all colors (but no purple). The children all play together. Because the "race issue" is not an issue, it doesn't exist. There's no difference at all. The "racist society" is kept alive in the public schools. That's where it is bread and nutured!

30 posted on 04/17/2002 2:19:15 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
PS....

We have all colors (but no purple).

As a matter of after thought, we do have a "purple" dad that pops in once in a while. I think he has really high blood pressure or something. I hope he takes medication. I worry for him whenever I see him around.

31 posted on 04/17/2002 2:25:18 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sicon
Herpes and genital warts (#1 cause of cervical cancer) transmission is NOT, nor ever has been prevented by condoms.

There is no such thing as safe sex, except it is a media myth created by the purveyors of the sexual revolution.

32 posted on 04/17/2002 2:50:05 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
Ah, but Sicon has a point.

A condom, ditributed by institutions/ authorities, is both a license and prophylactic. In the heat of passion, only the license part, the most important aspect, is often remembered.

33 posted on 04/17/2002 3:22:37 PM PDT by Z.Hobbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
Sounds like you are doing quite well with "your" children. You hit on something about relatives in the public schools.

My sister has six kids. The oldest, age 17, may have Parkinson's Disease, the 15 year old girl has a growth disorder and has been on growth hormones for about three years, the 12 year old has been labeled as having disabilities. He can't comprehend or remember things. I told my sister to homeschool but the bottom line is it would cramp her style. Sometimes I think God gives us problems such as the ones mentioned as a wake up call to take better care of the family.

Just my .02 worth.

34 posted on 04/17/2002 3:33:42 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Z.Hobbs
Since their (condom) failure as a prophylaxis is documented and well known, might we assume that those handing them out like halloween candy are engaged in licensing sex rather than preventing disease?
35 posted on 04/17/2002 4:02:40 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sicon
Dear Sicon: You are wrong re your statements of effectiveness of male latex condoms-Physicians Consortium reports that, at best, they are no more than 85% effective against HIV. THe National Institute of Health recently issued a report that condoms are not proven to protect against a large number of STD's, Physicians Consortium reports that, for some major STD's that are skin/lesion to skin/lesion transmitted, they offer no protection at all. One such STD is HPV human papiloma virus, the major cause of genital cancer in women in the USA. Many reports note male latex condom failure rates re pregnancy for women in first year of use from 23 to 72 %. This is due to many factors. Condom slippage. Condom spillage. Condom tears. Poor condom technique. Condom defects. Microscopic holes in latex condom fabric itself. Failure to cover infected areas. The Physicians Consortium are lobbying for the US COngress to require condoms to be labeled with a warning disclosing the known significant failure rates of same re preventing HIV, STD's & pregnancy. Thank you for your interest in this post. RWBaral
36 posted on 04/17/2002 7:51:44 PM PDT by RWBaral
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
Why is this article so full of typos and misspelled words? Is this an actual article published somewhere or a vanity you put together?
37 posted on 04/17/2002 8:05:31 PM PDT by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
Please use a spell-checker.
38 posted on 04/17/2002 9:51:30 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
bump
39 posted on 04/17/2002 10:04:34 PM PDT by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
We must also make a concerted effort to help parents get the voucher programs they need to give their kids an alternative to Perversion 101!
40 posted on 04/17/2002 10:39:40 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson