Posted on 11/27/2001 9:42:27 AM PST by BCR #226
Brady Campaign: Support Mary Leigh Blek in Debate with John Lott
11/26/2001
Contact Information: Brendan Daly Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence 1225 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202) 898-0792 www.bradycampaign.org
Lend your Support to Mary Leigh Blek, Director of MMM!
Mary Leigh needs your support! Join Mary Leigh Blek, director of the Million Mom March united with the Brady Campaign on Wednesday, November 28, 2001 at McKendree College in Lebanon, Ill., as she takes on one of the outspoken critics of gun control, John Lott.
Mary Leigh will debate the issues surrounding gun control, including ownership, licensing and waiting periods, with pro-gun researcher John Lott and author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control. Mary Leigh needs your moral support! We anticipate that Mr. Lott will have a lot of support there for his side. Action: Bring friends and family to the debate to show your support for stronger gun control laws.
Details:
Join Mary Leigh on Wednesday, November 28 at McKendree College in the Melvin Price Convocation Center at 7 p.m. Seating is limited and reservations are encouraged. Call 618/537-6863 from Illinois, or 314/436-3301 from St. Louis, ext. 6863. You may also RSVP online.
Background Information:
Mary Leigh began her crusade against gun violence in 1994, after her 21-year-old son, Matthew was shot by a teen with a Saturday Night Special. The Million Mom March took Washington, D.C., by storm on Mother's Day in 2000 and merged with the Brady Campaign in October 2001.
Date Released: November 26, 2001
Please freep this event if you are in the area.
Mike
The crime report for her son's shooting should be publicly available. I wonder if her son was an innocent bystander or somehow involved with the teen doing the shooting.
Any pro-2A sleuths out there?
Going up against John Lott? She'll need more that that...
Mary Leigh began her crusade against gun violence in 1994, after her 21-year-old son, Matthew was shot by a teen with a Saturday Night Special.
How can this be, since teenagers can't legally own firearms?
Matthew Charles Blek
21 Years Old
August 29, 1972 to June 29, 1994
Matthew Blek, of Mission Viejo, California, was a talented athlete, musician and scholar who enjoyed hiking and the outdoors, playing the guitar and violin, and was majoring in honors physics and math.
Most of all, Matthew was a warm and caring person who had a bright and promising future - a future cut short by senseless gun violence.
In June of 1994, Matthew Blek was working at a summer job in New York City, with plans to return to California in the fall for his senior year of college. One evening as he and a girlfriend were walking home from a date, they were confronted by three armed teenagers. Although he offered no resistance, Matthew was shot and killed. The youths were murdered Matthew were armed with Saturday Night Specials - cheap and easily obtained handguns, many of which are made in the very place Matthew called home: Orange County, California.
Joseph Lee was convicted of murder and sentenced to nine years to life. The two other teens pleaded guilty to manslaughter (Man-one) and were sentenced to 3 and 1/2 to 10 years in prison.
Lets see... Matthew was in New York, a state that already strict requirements for gun ownership. In order to be able to purchase a gun, you would have to get a permit from the state, which could take close to a year. Why isn't New York safe for law-abiding citizens with all of the gun control hoops law-abiding citizens have to go through to exercise the right guarranteed by the Second Amendment?
What if Matthew Blek was taught proper gun handling when he was young, and had a valid CCW permit from the state of New York when he was confronted by the 3 hoodlums with guns? Sure, its still 3 to 1 odds, but I bet a liberal CCW issuance policy would have encouraged these 3 pondscums to do something else.
And this in the gun-control utopia of NYC as you point out.
One evening as he and a girlfriend were walking home from a date,
It wouldn't have been 3:1 odds had she also been armed and prepared. And there's a fair chance that the creeps attacking the pair would have been utterly demoralized at the reality of both their victims offering effective resistance- that's been the case in two such situations that happened to come my way.
I suppose the unarmed Blek not only got himself killed, but also his date, since the killers had nothing to lose to finishing off the witness to Blek's murder. It certainly sounds like they died like a couple of sheep, bleating for their lives.
-archy-/-
Here's the real problem. 9 years for murder. He probably got out in 5 and is now preying upon our kids.
John Lott kicks ass in a debate. My only hope is that there is a moderator to make sure standard debate rules are followed. He's not real big on shouting down his oponents.
Mike
ISN'T IT AMAZING how a grass roots even has blossomed overnight into a national political organization? The press releases issued by the Million Mom March (MMM) last spring were designed to give the illusion that the MMM was being run by a few well-meaning Moms from their kitchen table. The media bought into that fairy tale, hook, line and sinker. After all, the chief organizer, Donna Dees-Thomases, who was described by Time magazine as a housewife and mother of two children from New Jersey, signed her letter on their web page, as "Just One of a Million." It wasn't until a commentary appeared in the Wall Street Journal by Lisa Schiffren that Ms. Dees-Thomases was exposed for what she was: a very clever member of the vast left-wing Clinton conspiracy.
Dees-Thomases is not only the sister-in-law of Susan Thomases, Hillary Clinton's closest friend, confidant, and political advisor, but she was also a very well-connected public relations expert, who had worked for a United States Senator, for Dan Rather, and was on leave from David Letterman at the time of the march. She cleverly used her contacts and political friends to turn the MMM into a media spectacular. The day of the march, she and 1,000 of her friends and organizers visited with Bill and Hillary at the White House prior to the event.
The actual march fell way short of the million Moms expected, even though the March organizers got city officials in Richmond, Virginia to pay for bus transportation. The announcement read:
A CARAVAN of buses will leave from Richmond at 7 a.m., at the Arthur Ashe Center, 3001 N. Boulevard, to transport persons interested in attending the million mom march in Washington, D.C. on Sunday the 14th of May, and return approximately at 6 p.m. The bus ride is free. To reserve a seat or for more details, call Teresa Dayrit, (804) 358-4646, or contact her by e-mail at: richmondmmm@mediaone.net
The Richmond Times Dispatch of May 15 affirmed that the city of Richmond paid for eight buses to take gun-control advocates to the Million Mom March City, costing taxpayers approximately $6,000. Some of these women, when asked why they went, answered, It was a free trip to D.C., why not?
Many of the Moms left the march early to go the nearest Northern Virginia shopping mall. At Pentagon City mall, one of the marchers identified by her Million Mom March t-shirt, said, "Sure, I took one of the buses here. I've never been to Washington. It was a good chance to see the monuments and do a little shopping. It was something different to do on Mother's Day."
Additional allegations have surfaced that Northwest Airlines sold cut-rate round-trip tickets from the West Coast to the March. Senator Diane Feinstein's (D-CA) husband is affiliated with Northwest, and her office purportedly publicized the ticket availability.
Schoolteachers and administrators also enticed their students to attend. Maryland School officials admitted that the PTA fliers sent home with students endorsed the Million Mom March, and students who attended the march were allowed to count that time towards the graduation requirement of 75 hours of student service learning.
The march also had its share of victims; people who had suffered as a result of the criminal use of firearms or gun accidents. Many stories were poignant and heartbreaking. One victim was Barbara Lipscomb, a mother and grandmother, whose son, LePierre Clemons, was gunned down on Martin Luther King Jr's birthday just four months prior. LePierre was another victim of teenage violence in the nations capitol, and his mom told everyone she was going to the MMM to stop the violence.
Yet, 2 months later, on July 14, 2000 Barbara Lipscomb, now known as Barbara Ann Martin, found herself under arrest on a charge of assault with intent to kill. According to the Washington Post, D.C. police say they found three handguns and a TEC-9 submachine gun at her home.
Her arrest resulted from an attack on a 21-year-old man who was shot three times with one of those bullets lodging in his spine. The attack occurred on January 26th, less than two weeks after LePierre's murder. The police commander of the 7th District explained the January 26th shooting as a vigilante antic that went awry this was an innocent man, and now he is paralyzed. It obviously was an act of violence and retribution by a woman who supported and was supported by the MMM.
Surprisingly, it isn't the only instance of A Million-Mom Marcher getting aggressive. According to the Boulder Weekly of March 30, 2000, Robert Howell, vice-president of the Boulder Chapter of the Bell Campaign, attacked Shariar Ghalam, while Ghalam was exercising his First Amendment rights to speak in favor of gun control at a rally before a speech by Charlton Heston, President of the National Rifle Association. Then, on August 15th another MMM member accosted a gun owner who had a video camera. The cameraman was taping a public organizational meeting of MMM in Fort Collins, CO, when the MMM member hit the camera with a clipboard causing damage to his eye. It seems that there is little respect for the First and Fourth Amendment rights of those who disagree, by the members of the Colorado chapters of the MMM.
The MMM is now showing its true colors. According to several women who attended its first annual convention several weeks ago, the thrust of the MMM this fall is to elect Al Gore. The MMM has become what it was always intended to become: a full-fledged coordinated campaign with the Democratic Party to help elect the Gore-Lieberman ticket. This comment on their web site demonstrates their political focus plainly.
The New York Times reports that the NRA, which is spending millions and millions of dollars to support Governor Bush, is not expected to officially endorse him. The reason: they'll help the Governor more by NOT giving him a formal endorsement.
As a gnon-political action committee they have received tremendous funding from several not-for-profit organizations: They received a million dollars from the Packard Foundation and a staggering five million from the Emma Goldman foundation, and another million dollars anonymously. Their convention raised approximately $35,0000. Although those funds cannot be used for direct contributions to candidates, you can bet they will be used to educate voters about the stands of candidates on the issue of gun control and direct those voters to the appropriate campaigns.
To quote from the report of an attendee at the MMM convention:
All of their media people, lobbyists, speakers, organizers, photographers, are seasoned professionals. They literally have the very best that money can buy. They are stacked with folks who have worked in many, many liberal causes and campaigns and take many years of experience with them to the political arena. The Million Mom March is anything but a grass roots group of angry housewives and mothers, wanting to protect the children.
It has become crystal clear that the MMM is full of rank-and-file members of the liberal wing of the Democratic party, who are being orchestrated by the Democratic National Committee, the Gore Campaign, and all the Clinton advisors. It was never a small group of Moms around a kitchen table, but a small group of political and public relations professionals, who are taking the gun control agenda to a new and higher level - a level designed to help anti-gun Democrats keep control of the White House and retake control of the Congress.
Tanya K. Metaksa is the former executive director of the National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action. She is the author of Safe, Not Sorry, a self-protection manual, published in 1997. She has appeared on numerous talk and interview shows such as "Crossfire," the "Today" show, "Nightline," "This Week with David Brinkley" and the "McNeil-Lehrer Hour," among others.
That would be "to speak against gun control ..."
Shariar is as pro-gun as they come - and he likes to put smiles on people's faces by letting them shoot his (fully registered and anal-probed) 20 mm Solothurn and Ma Deuce 50 cal and other machine guns.
With the media on their side, they had no reason to debate.
Wish that were so. They just got a huge infusion of cash from a liberal foundation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.