Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ashcroft's Warning: Dirty Bomb

Posted on 10/30/2001 4:17:08 PM PST by DrCarl

Am I the only one who heard Sean Hannity, at about 5:40PM EST, stop while on the air and say: "So that's what Ashcroft's warning is. It's a dirty bomb."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dirtybomb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-320 next last
To: blam
The chemical notation for potassium iodide is NOT "PI".

It is "KI"

Cheers.

181 posted on 10/30/2001 6:11:41 PM PST by Tessaresopsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: blam
Potassium iodide is an antidote for radiation poisoning.

Not for all radiation poisoning. Only for radioactive iodine. Moreover, you have to start the treatment before exposure. The potassium iodide (potassium iodate is also available) floods your thyroid with iodine, so when the radioactive iodine arrives, it can't be absorbed by the thyroid. It doesn't do any good for any other kind of radioactive poisoning.

I got some from a survivalist mail order house. Can't remember which one now.

182 posted on 10/30/2001 6:12:20 PM PST by JoeFromSidney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tessaresopsis
PIKI PIKI PIKI :}
183 posted on 10/30/2001 6:12:54 PM PST by P8riot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: chantal7
>. If a dirty bomb of any kind goes off or if there is any other terrorist attack then we'd be fools not to nuke Afghanistan, Iraq, maybe Sudan, Iran, Syria, Indonesia, etc

Yes we would. Let them talk about how horrible we were 40 years from now. Who cares? Our response must be monumental. It must secure freedom in a single day. And by the way, the following day, I don't want my tax dollars going to feed what's left of them either.

184 posted on 10/30/2001 6:13:10 PM PST by DrCarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: glc1173@aol.com
This doesn't make realistic sense. The Taliban doesn't have a delivery system for this type of bomb. And if they did, we have the equipment and technology to detect and destroy such a bomb and send it into the ocean before it can do any damage except kill a few fishes.
185 posted on 10/30/2001 6:14:16 PM PST by chouli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
What if they have more than one of these dirty bombs here in the country. Mean they have had more than the last 10 years planning this as well as the NYC attack. They could have a few hidden all over the country waiting for the right moment to set them off.
186 posted on 10/30/2001 6:14:25 PM PST by GeeYouToo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: imperator2
JUST STUFF THEM IN A DEEP DARK HOLE, or do what they do and use them as(in)human-sheilds!!!!!!!!!!!!
187 posted on 10/30/2001 6:15:15 PM PST by ChefKeith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
We'll meet again..., Don't know where, don't know when, but we'll meet again some sunny day Dr Strangelove, uh I mean Carl
188 posted on 10/30/2001 6:15:43 PM PST by P8riot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: chouli
The Taliban doesn't have a delivery system for this type of bomb.

What about stolen US airplanes or helicopters?

189 posted on 10/30/2001 6:15:47 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
bump
190 posted on 10/30/2001 6:17:53 PM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: D Joyce
A "dirty" bomb, at least while I was in the military, was described as a surface or subsurface nuclear detonation. The material thrown up, from the blast, is highly radio active and could carry for miles. Even a small nuke can contaminate a very large area.

I think that's a "Dirty Nuke," whereas this is just a conventional bomb with dirty material attached, or a "Dirty Bomb."

191 posted on 10/30/2001 6:18:11 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
bump
192 posted on 10/30/2001 6:18:36 PM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
I think that's a "Dirty Nuke," whereas this is just a conventional bomb with dirty material attached, or a "Dirty Bomb."

Kind of like a "Fruit of the Loom" boom

193 posted on 10/30/2001 6:21:22 PM PST by P8riot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: FUSSBALL
I'm 50 years old and grew up in the Cold War. Spent a lot of years as a survivalist preparing for the Nuclear War eventuality. So the research I've done on radiation and its effects is easily equivalent to several upper level and graduate level courses in radiation chemistry and biology. Just some basic examples of the kind of information you need to know before you can even begin to figure out the deadliness of radioactive materials:

1) what is current exposure to a typical human being from natural sources of radiation? (200 millirem).

2) What is the LD-50 for humans? (450 rem instant exposure, assuming no attempt to help the person).

3) How many biogical half-lives for plutonium-239 in the human body? (about 5, by which time it is in the bone and has a biogical half-life of 10,000 years).

4) What are the different types of radiation? (alpha particles, gamma rays, beta decay electrons).

5) How deadly is Plutonium-239 and what has to be done to it to make it an effective cancer agent? (if ingested, about as deadly as caffeine; it doesn't pass across the gastrointestinal tract very well. To cause cancer in rats so it could be studied, it has to be ground down to the right size at temps of 900 C. Then special blowers have to be used to blow it through the rat cages since Plutonium is so dense it will rapidly plate out onto the cage surfaces.)

And so on and so forth. Radiation is radiation, and having an understanding of it is vital for dispelling hysterical nonsense.

194 posted on 10/30/2001 6:21:42 PM PST by Vauss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: blam

195 posted on 10/30/2001 6:22:40 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FReethesheeples
Well I just hope they dont try anything with a train. A train weighing in at oh 100,000 tons would be awfully hard to stop.
196 posted on 10/30/2001 6:23:00 PM PST by FUSSBALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: blam
Weather patterns in the US generally move west to east.

I am 7 miles from the Pacific Ocean. Not much further west from here, although I have some friends who are only a few blocks from the beach.

197 posted on 10/30/2001 6:24:46 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vauss
I understand and respect what you are saying ( I do ) but you take all of what you just said. Which is mostly theoretical. And have it take place in real life at a much larger scale.


I Dont want to find out either way. Hopefully we will all be sitting around speaking to our computers 20 years from now discussing this further.


Computer! Start log. Star date....oh sorry

198 posted on 10/30/2001 6:27:06 PM PST by FUSSBALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Chernobyl has shown, and continues to reveal, that the greatest danger from radioiodine is to the tiny thyroid glands of children. Researchers have found that in certain parts of Belarus, for example, 36.4 per cent of children, who were under the age of four at the time of the accident, can expect to develop thyroid cancer. Also, "This increase in incidence has been documented up to 500 km from the accident site."


I love it didnt someone just write earlier that Chernobyl ended up not hurting anyone and the evidence shows that we think radiation is worse than it realy is. HHMMMM Hysteria lol so funny

199 posted on 10/30/2001 6:28:52 PM PST by FUSSBALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: P8riot
>We'll meet again..., Don't know where

Possibly Fiji? Bring your fishin' pole. No! Bring two.

200 posted on 10/30/2001 6:29:29 PM PST by DrCarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-320 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson