Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has Bush outfoxed bin Laden?
New Australian ^ | Thursday 27 September 2001 | James Henry

Posted on 09/27/2001 6:56:04 AM PDT by Tai_Chung

The terrorist atrocities inflicted on the US have give rise to a new rumor mill that grinds out stories that range from the banal to the bizarre. But a story out of the Middle East has more credibility than most, particularly in certain quarters. Some cooler and more intelligent heads in the Arab world have concluded that Bush has outfoxed the fanatical bin Laden.

Like all fanatics bin Laden is narrowly on his mission while being disconnected from the real world. Far from being the educated man he is said to be he, like his suicide-bombers, is remarkable ignorant of the West, specially the US. Although some of his followers have been educated at Western Universities their education has been confined to technical subjects like engineering. Those, for example, who attended US universities learnt nothing of US history or cultural values, confusing topless bars, which some of them enjoyed, with moral decay and lack of will. The sad fact is that what little they knew of US history and policies came entirely from the country’s anti-American left, which has painted a grossly dishonest picture of America that neatly fitted in with these terrorists’ anti-American dogma thus blinding them further to the political and military consequences of their actions.

As our editor pointed out at a recent seminar in Australia, being narrowly focused to the exclusion of all else is part of the terrorists’ Achilles heel. And so it is with bin Laden. Believing himself to be the hand of God and a follower of the one true faith, or his fanatical version of it, means he operates with an open loop. Therefore there is no negative feedback mechanism to correct his distorted picture of the world. There are no advisers to council restraint or retreat because like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc., he literally believes himself to be the only one capable of interpreting events and predicting their consequences.

Now we have bin Laden’s fundamental weakness. Being truly ignorant of American history and knowing nothing of the country’s political system he has made the mistake of drawing the wrong lesson from a narrow range of fairly recent events by interpreting it in terms of his world view: the refusal of George Bush senior’s to finish off Saddam Hussein, the hasty retreat from Somalia, the successful bombing of US embassies and military bases in Saudi Arabia, the attack on the Cole and Clinton’s self-serving pinprick responses to terrorism.

In bin Laden’s fantasy America would either respond in a Clintonesque way and so demonstrate to the world its cowardly nature or it would blindly strike out, killing hundreds if not thousands of innocents and so inflame the whole of the Islamic world. (Notice how closely his apocalyptic vision resembles the extreme left’s one of a world-wide revolution against capitalism).

He got neither. Instead of grabbing the initiative he made a terrible blunder. His actions pulled the US together, awakening in it a steely resolve that can have only one outcome. Instead of retreating or immediately striking out, President Bush set about building up a mighty military force not only to destroy bin Laden but to demonstrate to the rest of the world the consequences of attacking America. Afghanistan has been isolated, it’s borders sealed.

Battle lines have been drawn and are being supported with varying degrees of enthusiasm. Russia, Tajikstan. Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, even Iran, Pakistan and China are cooperating. British special forces (SAS) are already operating in the country while American special forces are moving in. A coordinated plan consisting of concentrated air attacks on terrorist camps and Taliban installations, special forces assault teams, and the cooperation of the Northern Alliance is being put into action. None of this, so the story goes, is supposed to be happening.

Moreover, there are rumors that the scale of the forces that bin Laden has unleashed has caused subterranean cracks to appear within the Taliban’s ranks, with some of them wondering why they should have to take the fall for bin Laden. The smarter ones know they are not popular among the mass of Afghans, and that if properly equipped and supported by Western powers the Northern Alliance would drive them back to their mountain villages — that is if the locals don’t hang them from cranes and artillery barrels first.

Afghan refugees are relating tales of an increasing number of Taliban acts of banditry and rape as order collapses in the towns and cities. The wholesale kidnapping of non-Pashtun males aged between 15 and 30 for ‘military’ service smells of panic because the Taliban knows these males belong to hostile ethnic minorities. These are not the actions of men who believe in their own invincibility.

So to some Arab observers Bush has already won. But surely if bin Laden is killed other bin Laden’s will arise. There is only one bin Laden, thank God. This latter-day Mahdi is just another religious millenarian who promises paradise by driving out the infidel, the cause of the faithful’s misery. Such people have been a curse throughout history.

I’m not saying that terrorism will end with bin Laden, only that his head must be the first to roll if victory is to be achieved. Once this is done, the invisible war against terrorism will accelerate, from the freezing of bank accounts to the assassination of terrorist organizers and the smashing of their networks.

The strategy, as explained to me, is basically simple. Make an example of bin Laden, demonstrate overwhelming military power and the will to use it against states that harbor and train terrorists; isolate the terrorists physically and squeeze them psychologically. The ultimate aim is the elimination of state-sponsored terrorism.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last
To: alancarp
Recall that it took about six months to set up Desert Storm.

Yes, I know it well. But the difference is we were up against an entrenched enemy. Here they're dispersing more and more with every passing day.

41 posted on 09/27/2001 8:08:46 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bouncer
Liberals are so funny when they are out of power. Even 60% liberals, as your profile says. I won't tell you what I think the other 40% really is.
42 posted on 09/27/2001 8:08:56 AM PDT by michaelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Relax, it's just a joke. Even us lefties have a sense of humor.
43 posted on 09/27/2001 8:09:26 AM PDT by Bouncer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
Iran is NOT cooperating. Other than that, good read.
44 posted on 09/27/2001 8:14:37 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter, kevkrom
The blood of these innocents is on their hands as well as the terrorists.

Agreed, I nearly said the same thing.

Don't forget the overwhelmingly leftist faculties at the U.S. universities attended by the terrorists. Yup, and as skeeter says, "The blood of these innocents is on their hands as well as the terrorists."

45 posted on 09/27/2001 8:15:13 AM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bouncer
Considered dangerous, last seen stealing an election in Florida.

I may already be too late, but...5...4...3...2...1...Flame suit on... You are an idiot. Let the flames begin...

46 posted on 09/27/2001 8:16:52 AM PDT by Darth Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SodiumWarthog
I agree. Time to dust off some off the old style atom bombs of the Hiroshima range and take out a few hundred thousand. Not to destroy the entire nation just to remind people that we have used nukes in anger before and to put the fear of our God in them. BTW: The reason we didn't kill Saddam during D.S was the Christian belif in redemption. We wanted to believe that Saddam would change his evil ways. We see that we were wrong now.
47 posted on 09/27/2001 8:17:42 AM PDT by ffusco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Anyone who desires to turn this into a West vs. Islam conflict should also realize that we can target Mecca for instaneous destruction.

The four pillars of Islam require: fasting, prayers, Zakat (alms-giving) and Hajj (pilgrimage to Mecca). Let future Muslims Hajj to a glassy radioactive crater in the desert...

by francisandbeans:

Me thinks the author has donned some spectacles with a rosy hue.

Don't underestimate bin Laden. Don't underestimate the willingness of Arabs to force this into a West Vs. Islam conflict. Don't underestimate the willingnedd of some Israelis to turn this into a Wesy vs. Islam conflict. Don't underestimate anyone...including friends and so-called allies. We are knee deep in the thornbush right now and the last thing we need to do is assume victory. 5 Posted on 09/27/2001 07:03:09 PDT by francisandbeans

48 posted on 09/27/2001 8:18:40 AM PDT by 5by5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: Tai_Chung
"As our editor pointed out at a recent seminar in Australia, being narrowly focused to the exclusion of all else is part of the terrorists’ Achilles heel."

HEY!!! I said that 6 months ago!!!!
50 posted on 09/27/2001 8:19:48 AM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: Bouncer
So, what is your take on this? Seriously, do a little monday morning quarterbacking for us, so we can get an idea what a self proclaimed "leftie" thinks should have been done under the circumstances.
52 posted on 09/27/2001 8:22:26 AM PDT by 101viking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 101viking
I'm not a lefty but I'll say this.... we told the world that terrorists and those that harbor them were history. The Taliban should be a memory now.

Has Bush outfoxed Bin Laden? Nope.

53 posted on 09/27/2001 8:25:44 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GEC
Do you have a link to the Turley article?
54 posted on 09/27/2001 8:26:31 AM PDT by George Smiley (george.smiley@lycos.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bouncer
Doesn't look much like Al Gore to me.
55 posted on 09/27/2001 8:28:45 AM PDT by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

To: Tai_Chung
Hello quidam, is that you? (I mean the author, not the poster.) The article reminds me of our own quidam's weighty interpretations of Ken Starr's inaction (or puzzling moves for that matter) during the glory days of the Whitewater investigations. I certainly hope the author is right, but I tend to think that too little is now known to us to reach any conclusions about Bush's team's strategy.

One thing for sure though. These turbaned monkeys are as ignorant of the ways of the West as, well, turbaned monkey. The best comparison that comes to mind would be our home grown "idealists", the SLA and the Weathermen. 'Naive fools' would be the most generous term to describe them. Dangerous and naive.

57 posted on 09/27/2001 8:31:10 AM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
We should all be singing the praises of one who will go down in history as one of our great Presidents. He is surprising even the most hardened socialists with his courageous calm and down home intellect. He truely is a Uniter.

The entire middle east is shaking in their sandals as the supporting nations of terrorism are slowly exposed to the civilized world. George W has shown compassion, passionate patriotism, sensitivity and leadership while comforting a nation stung sharply by senseless mmass murder. He is also sending a strong message to the world. That America is still the greatest Nation on earth. That we can survive and overcome. And woe is any Nation that dare rise up against freedom and democracy. Go GWB!!!

58 posted on 09/27/2001 8:32:55 AM PDT by dokmad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
bttt
59 posted on 09/27/2001 8:34:28 AM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith
...Hanoi Jane, meet Kabul Jesse.

LOL! Yeah, maybe it won't hurt him with the 'hate whitey' crowd, but it will certainly diminish him in the eyes of the average 'Joe and Jane' on the street. And if the Taliban forces keep up their 'press gangs' and violence against the Afghani people simply trying to get the hell out of the way, I think old Jesse will get connected with the Taliban in the most negative way possible... Well, I can dream, can't I?

60 posted on 09/27/2001 8:34:57 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson