Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the towers collapsed: hit at vulnerable point
Salon ^ | 9/11/01 | Bill Wyman

Posted on 09/11/2001 4:27:20 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes

Sept. 11, 2001 |
The World Trade Center's twin towers were the tallest buildings in the world at the time of their opening in 1970. They each stood 110 stories and more than 1,300 feet tall. They are the dominant features in an enormous office complex totaling more than 9 million square feet of office space and together make up one of the most recognizable architectural landmarks in the world.

Today they were reduced to heaps of rubble after one of the worst catastrophes in U.S. history. A pair of jetliners crashed into them Tuesday morning -- at precisely the points at which they would do the most damage, according to architectural experts. The impacts created fires and, ultimately, brought about the collapse of both buildings.

Why did the buildings collapse?
According to Gregory Fenves, a professor of Civil Engineering at the University of California at Berkeley, the planes weakened the buildings' structures at key points. Fenves, working on information gleaned from preliminary TV reports, stressed that he was speculating. He said that if the planes had hit the structures higher, they could have merely damaged their tops; if they had hit lower, they would have been up against the enormous weight and resistance of the base of the buildings.

The buildings were architecturally interesting in many ways. Each structure is based on a central steel core, which is surrounded by the outside wall, a 209-foot by 209-foot cube of 18-inch tubular steel columns, set 22 inches apart. The cores and "tube walls" share the enormous physical weight of the structures and protect them against the extraordinary wind forces of buildings that tall. There are trusses that support each floor, but no other columns between the cores and outside walls. Some floors contain nearly 40,000 square feet of open office space.

News reports said the planes were jetliners, a 757 and a 767. The 757 has a 124-foot wingspan, is 155 feet long and can weigh 100 tons. A 767 is bigger, with a 156-foot wingspan and 159-foot length and can weigh a maximum of 200 tons. (A 747 is more than 200 feet long and can weigh 400 tons.)
The planes hit the buildings near the 70th or 80th floors. Their impact severely damaged the tube walls, which carried a large proportion of the buildings' weight. CNN footage of the second plane hitting a tower appeared to show that a large part of the jetliner went all the way through the building, suggesting that the interior core was also damaged.

Once a building like a World Trade Center tower loses some of its support, the building in effect goes to work, Fenves said. "The loads are trying to redistribute," he said. "The loads are figuring out how to get back down to the ground." At the same time, he noted, the fires are deforming the physical properties of the support steel.

"It's a very rugged system," he said. "It takes a long time for the collapse mechanism to develop. It's not like kicking the leg out from underneath a chair. The building is 200-foot square and there's a lot of structural system there."

But once the upper floors began to give way, terrible force was set in motion. Each floor of a building that big might weigh 6 million pounds, he said. Once impact is factored in as well, he said, the force becomes irresistible.

The disaster is a terrible echo of another disaster involving a New York landmark.
On July 25, 1945, a B-25 bomber slammed into the north side of the Empire State Building, then the tallest building in the world. A reckless pilot was flying over Manhattan in poor visibility; it was apparently an accident. Thirteen people died, mostly in fires started by burning gasoline.

The Empire State Building, Fenves noted, was built during the Depression, and made with a much heavier structural system. The bomber in that accident was also a much smaller plane, said Fenves.
The WTC buildings' official names are One and Two World Trade Center; their respective heights are 1,368 and 1,362 feet tall. They are part of a massive seven-building complex near the southeastern end of Manhattan. The center's architect was Minoru Yamasaki. The engineers were John Skilling and Leslie Robertson of Worthington, Skilling, Helle and Jackson.

The complex cost $350 million in 1966, or nearly $2 billion in today's dollars. Ground was broken in 1966, and the buildings opened in 1970, but the complete center was not finished until 1974; there are now seven total buildings, a large shopping mall, and an enormous garage. An observation deck is a popular tourist destination. Beneath the center two New York subway lines converge; there is also the Manhattan terminus of PATH commuter trains from New Jersey.

The center has been the target of an attack before. On Feb. 26, 1993, terrorists linked to Osama bin Laden planned and carried out a truck bombing in the parking garage. Prosecutors said the weapon was a 1,200-pound truck bomb. Six people died and more than 1,000 were injured in the attack. The explosion created a five-story crater beneath the building, but its structure held.

After the center opened in 1970, for several years it was feared the complex would become a real-estate white elephant. But for decades it then reigned as one of New York City's premier office buildings. A recent press release from the New York and New Jersey Port Authorities, which own the building, says that more than 430 companies from 28 countries are tenants. The authorities said that 40,000 employees work in the buildings daily, besides 140,000 daily visitors.

The World Trade Center lost its position as the world's tallest building in 1974, when the Sears Tower in Chicago opened. In 1998 the two Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, opened; they are each more than 100 feet taller than the World Trade Center structures.
 


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2001 4:27:20 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
I think they learned a lesson from the truck bomb which created a large crater but didn't bring it down.Someone with archectural training taught them how.
2 posted on 09/11/2001 4:31:57 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
Fascinating. With both planes hitting at vulnerable areas, it sounds like very sophisticated planning took place. Who has the brains and money to do that? Bin Laden. Sadaam. And who else?
3 posted on 09/11/2001 4:34:11 PM PDT by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
The most expensive commercial real estate in the world is no more.No other group of buildings could compare to its value or prestige.
4 posted on 09/11/2001 4:35:20 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
We will have to rebuild the WTC in North Dakota, with 44 5-story buildings, each separated by a couple thousand yards.

Replace the rubble of the WTC with a memorial park, then burn down the UN building and make that into a memorial park as well.

5 posted on 09/11/2001 4:35:27 PM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Is Rush Psychic?

Is Rush psychic? Cover of the Limbaugh Letter August 2001
Uncanny.
6 posted on 09/11/2001 4:36:49 PM PDT by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
Not vulnerable areas - it was, as the article alludes to, the heat from the fire. A couple of hours ago, i ran into a guy who was 2 blocks away and saw the first tower collapse.

It was the sheer weight that did it after the metal melted.

7 posted on 09/11/2001 4:37:30 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
Someone is going to be taking a serious look at the structural integrity of these buildings, especially since the structural engineer who designed them insisted at a recent conference that they were designed to handle a crash from a large passenger jet. It won't be easy to cover anything up here, since the most diligent people involved with the investigation will be the ones who work for the insurance companies.

My understanding is that the external tubular "lattice frame" was a new innovation at the time, and it was considered crucial in the design of any large structure because it minimized the amount of usable floor space that would be lost to internal columns. I don't mean to imply that the design was substandard, but I believe the World Trade Center was not required to meet City of New York building codes because the Port Authority of NY & NJ is a semi-autonomous agency that operates under its own regulations.

8 posted on 09/11/2001 4:38:01 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Heat from the jet fuel melted away the internal support, and the top caved in, and collapsed the structure.

Thats it.

9 posted on 09/11/2001 4:38:18 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tet68
think they learned a lesson from the truck bomb which created a large crater but didn't bring it down.
Ha ha!

You conveniently OVERLOOK those beams/columns DESTROYED by that bomb blast!

BTW, the author of this 'piece' overlooks the effects of heat (the fire) and it's effects on the materials involved (steel and concrete) ...

10 posted on 09/11/2001 4:40:30 PM PDT by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes, PoisedWoman
Thanks for the article, LfD. It was a very interesting read.

Were there more than one "sect" involved in this hideous destruction of life?

11 posted on 09/11/2001 4:41:40 PM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
I hppe Bush gets together with Port Authority to rebuild the World Trade Center-updated as the tallest building in New York before the end of his administration.
12 posted on 09/11/2001 4:42:35 PM PDT by calebcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
I hppe Bush gets together with Port Authority to rebuild the World Trade Center-updated as the tallest building in New York before the end of his administration.
13 posted on 09/11/2001 4:42:38 PM PDT by calebcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
This would suggest they have an engineer helping them, I'm still not convinced there are very many people involved in carrying out this attack, though.
14 posted on 09/11/2001 4:43:11 PM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Looking for Diogenes
"He said that if the planes had hit the structures higher, they could have merely damaged their tops; if they had hit lower, they would have been up against the enormous weight and resistance of the base of the buildings. "

I doubt it. The planes would have taken down the towers if they had hit anywhere except the top floors. The structural support would burn away anywhere.

16 posted on 09/11/2001 4:45:31 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
I think they learned a lesson from the truck bomb which created a large crater but didn't bring it down.Someone with archectural training taught them how.

Interesting that you should say this. After the OKC bombing, there was a special group formed which examined this exact subject.

17 posted on 09/11/2001 4:46:27 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calebcar
I hppe(sic) Bush gets together with Port Authority to rebuild the World Trade Center-updated as the tallest building in New York before the end of his administration.

If they were to rebulid it would you go to work at the new WTC?

18 posted on 09/11/2001 4:47:23 PM PDT by Austim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Looking for Diogenes
As a civil engineer with some experience in structural design, I don't agree with this analysis. They didn't have to be hit at a weak point. The columns would not have been designed for the impact. The momentum of the plane (velocity and mass) was so great that if it collapsed enough of the columns at the level it hit or at a lower level, the weight of the structure above is such that once it started falling on the collapsed level, its inertia and weight would have collapsed anything beneath it.

That's one problem I have with these forums, there's too much uninformed speculation out there, and then others repeat this as fact.

20 posted on 09/11/2001 4:48:11 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson