My understanding is that the external tubular "lattice frame" was a new innovation at the time, and it was considered crucial in the design of any large structure because it minimized the amount of usable floor space that would be lost to internal columns. I don't mean to imply that the design was substandard, but I believe the World Trade Center was not required to meet City of New York building codes because the Port Authority of NY & NJ is a semi-autonomous agency that operates under its own regulations.
Two, the towers technically did withstand the collision, the ensueing fire probably did a lot of damage, warping the i-beams and generally weakened the structure.
Three, the guy said "a". The first tower hit was the last to fall, it's entirely feasable without the second collision it wouldn't have fallen; more than likely the shockwave of the first collision rattled through the entire structure (remember all 7 "buildings" used the same basement complex, they were very much attached to each other), probably weakening the entire thing, the second plane looks to have come in a little lower, able to do more damage to an already weakened building. Again the shockwave ran through the entire complex, exaserbating the damage to the first tower. The 2nd tower, apparently haveing taken more damage, collapsed first, again another huge shockwave.
Of course during all of this you have fire and gravity weakening the structure, you also have literally thousands of feet running down the stairs, making more vibration. Every piece of masonry that fell loose, every degree of fire heat applied to the structure, every second gravity was pulling down on the buildings, weakened the structure. Eventually gravity wins, it always does.
These buildings met and exceeded all building codes, and they underwent continuous life safety upgrades over their 35 year existence.
The one thing the PA does well is spend a lot of money on safety.
They both survived the crash. They probably did not analyze for the jet fuel fire!