Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Gender Gap Has Taken a Strange Turn {IntRA-gender differences in voters for Trump}
The New York Times ^ | 7th October 2026 | Thomas Edsall

Posted on 10/07/2026 5:05:51 AM PDT by Cronos

The traditional gender gap is losing ground as a key factor in politics to intragender gaps that have emerged among Republican and Democratic voters along the fault lines of masculinity and femininity.

This recent development involves differences within each gender, as opposed to the gender gap between men and women, which came to the forefront in the aftermath of the 1980 election between Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter,

Men — specifically white men — who see themselves as extremely masculine tend to support President Trump, while those who are weaker in their assessment of their masculinity — or in how they think about masculinity — are far less likely to support Trump. The gap between the two is just as significant if not more significant than the gender gap.

A similar, but more complex spread has emerged among women, although it is smaller and lends itself to competing interpretations.

The growing differences between the parties and their voters over masculinity, femininity and sex generally are sharpening the split between Democrats and Republicans over matters of life and death.

Amid rapid advances in technology, artificial intelligence and scientific research, the use of stem cells, the advents of state laws allowing assisted suicide and the disposition of embryos have all become partisan issues, following the path of abortion.

The basic question of whether differences between men and women are rooted in genetics or provoked by social expectations has also become intensely political. Pew Research reports that “majorities of Republicans point to biology as the main driver of differences between men and women,” while, on many issues, Democrats tend to believe these differences are “mostly based on the expectations society has for the two genders.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: liberaltruth; thegrayladyissenile

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

nothing new here for folks who have been voted R for decades...
1 posted on 10/07/2026 5:05:51 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Women are all about feelings. But no matter how strongly you “feel” about your gender it’s never gonna change your DNA.

CC


2 posted on 10/07/2026 5:09:24 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Math and science comprehension limits magical thinking. Reality bites


3 posted on 10/07/2026 5:20:16 AM PDT by griswold3 (Truth, Beauty and Goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I fail to see the point of posting an excerpt of an article protected by a pay wall.


4 posted on 10/07/2026 6:11:06 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
"Democrats tend to believe these differences are “mostly based on the expectations society has..."

More evidence to support what we always knew.
Democrats don't like science when it doesn't fit their narrative. They love it when it does.

Republicans are reality based and critical thinkers.
Democrats are fear based and magical thinkers.

In my opinion, despite some old cliches like "bleeding heart liberal", I believe conservatives are more positivist and want the people around them to to fare well. Ironically, even though most leftists are secular or athiest, they are pessimists and wish for a benevolent power to control people.
5 posted on 10/07/2026 6:13:59 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

This is a duh. They radicalized women into delusional hate filled shrews who entitled themselves to things men earned and tried to cancel men and boys at every opportunity. This is just a response.


6 posted on 10/07/2026 6:16:10 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paal Gulli

I think I posted the main point of the article - that manly men vote R while girlie-men vote D. For women it’s not that stark


7 posted on 10/07/2026 6:18:51 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
What exactly does "extremely" masculine mean in this context?

I suspect they mean masculine at all.

8 posted on 10/07/2026 6:20:37 AM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
The basic question of whether differences between men and women are rooted in genetics or provoked by social expectations has also become intensely political. Pew Research reports that “majorities of Republicans point to biology as the main driver of differences between men and women,” while, on many issues, Democrats tend to believe these differences are “mostly based on the expectations society has for the two genders.”

I am terminally disgusted with the inability of the researchers and pollsters to formulate the right questions here.

The gender binary has to do with reproductive biology. In that domain, biology is absolute. Two acorns cannot hook up and make a new oak tree. Two grains of pollen cannot do the deed and make a new corn plant, dandelion, or raspberry bush. It works the same way in the animal kingdom. Sorry non-binary people, but to reproduce, you need one of each.

Of course, there is a faction on the left that now views the human race as a cancer on the planet. And broadly across the left, the view is that the world is hopelessly overpopulated and that large reductions in population are desireable. This dovetails neatly with the always present temptation to live selfishly, turn away from marriage and children, and live in hedonism (at least until nihilism and despair take over).

The left's gender confusion is linked at a basic level with the abandonment of "Be fruitful and multiply," or "choose life," or the foundational story of God taking a rib from Adam to create Eve. Swap the sexes there if you want; the idea is that the sexes are complimentary, and each is needed to complete the other. Those who turn away from childbearing, resign from building the future, voluntarily check out of the gene pool, and live solely for themselves are encouraged by the left.

Anyhow ... the very different biological roles required for reproduction lead to significant differences in body structure and especially hormonal dosages. These in turn have very powerful effects on temperament and interests, as well as the social roles that evolve over time.

But in these downstream areas, there is substantial overlap. There are outliers in both sexes. The gender differences are expressed not as a binary, which they are at the level of reproductive biology, but as trait frequencies across large populations.

The pollsters almost never specify the relevant domain. They allow respondents to conflate everything into an undifferented mass in which opinions will be dominated by whatever activities are most relevant to the respondent. Men and women are equally good at many things. They are only marginally different -- looking at averages over large groups -- with regard to many other things. They are profoundly different with regard to some things, and absolutely different when it comes to reproduction.

The left tends not to care because it has become operationally indifferent, and at times hostile, to childbearing.

9 posted on 10/07/2026 6:39:31 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Democrats like to be pounded.


10 posted on 10/07/2026 6:54:26 AM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba (Pעומ לצד ישראל. The only good commie is one that's dead - Country Joe McDonald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...
So much for gender fluidity.

11 posted on 10/07/2026 6:59:21 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills and jihadists anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: z3n

Or IMO the converse:

People who are able to accept that objective reality exists vote largely for Republicans.

People who want to first create a fake world in their mind and insist that the world conforms to their pretending vote Democrat.


12 posted on 10/07/2026 7:53:28 AM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Written by a New York Times columnist whose vision is restricted to the skyscrapers that surround him.


13 posted on 10/07/2026 9:27:49 AM PDT by BrexitBen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
A similar, but more complex spread has emerged among women, although it is smaller and lends itself to competing interpretations.

I'd like to know a little more about this part. I'm female, and not particularly feminine in some respects (as in, very independent and self-reliant.) I wonder if that's what they mean.

14 posted on 10/07/2026 9:59:27 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

And then there are those called by the new “N” word...NORMAL.


15 posted on 10/07/2026 10:17:45 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson