Posted on 10/06/2026 9:20:22 PM PDT by lightman
A gang rape allegation has been made. It must be investigated. Local authorities looked into it, and no charges were filed. Now, a couple of years later, a new civil suit has been filed, past documents have been reviewed again, and the victim's statement is entirely different. I’m talking about the Cornell gang rape allegation, where a Jane Doe alleges in October 2024 that she was gang raped at a fraternity party. And the legions who have gone deep into debt on worthless, fake woke degrees are having their day in the sun.
There will be numerous hot takes, each stupider than the last, which is why these stories are never reported accurately. It’s not a Gen Z thing — the media has always been trash, dating back to the Duke Lacrosse rape story, which was a total fabrication. Believe All Women is a crock, and its life support was shut down after some very prominent liberal men were accused and some allegations were merely bad dates or regrettable sex, neither of which is rape.
That appears to be what happened here: Doe got high and drunk, then had group sex. No judgment, but later she concluded that she was raped, which is where we are now. This case isn’t as bad as the UVA gang rape hoax, where key parts of the Rolling Stone piece were debunked within days by The Washington Post. There should be an investigation, but determining whether there was consent will be tough, and the people leading this probe — New York Attorney General Letitia James — are simply not qualified or serious enough to pull it off. A circus is coming.
One side is blaming President Trump for this incident. It shows the depths of how broken and irrational liberal white women are and makes the case for terminating women's suffrage if they can’t get it together. First, Trump has never been convicted of rape. The civil trial was a crock, and E. Jean Carroll, who comes off as a bowl of cereal, doesn’t seem to act like a victim, and her story is remarkably similar to a Law and Order episode. She has planned a massive spending spree with her civil suit money. Again, is that how survivors act? Anyways, we have some people taking potshots at Trump, while others are doing their screaming-into-our-phone-all-alone bit, missing a key fact: Trump wasn’t president when this attack occurred. That would be Joe Biden. So, yeah, silly season has already begun. We knew it was coming, but with Trump, it’s going to be extra insane.
Jane Doe filed a civil suit on September 16, 2026.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
A "criminal investigation" two years after the fact seems Tishy to me.
If false accusation wasn't a problem it wouldn't be listed in the 10 Commandments.
What is the crucial point?
I was just going to ask the same question.
“Trump wasn’t president when this attack occurred”
The Federal Government and my State tried to gang rape me and my family with mRNA Covid jabs. It’s a blessing from God that Rio Linda Kay Ivey makes a lousy rapist.
The only “point” is to divert the presstitutes to some white boogey men as the November elections approach. Don’t want them distracting the public with any actual issues or anything.
I was reading about this and I don’t understand something.
What the heck is Ketamine and just how did the guys in that frat house get a hold of it so that they were passing it around like candy?
It’s a wonder no one died.
Lesson: Don't adopt the Left's twisted language!
Regards,
Bet the girls family is being compensated big time and starting to think daddy is a well known Dem
Because it will come out that she did give consent this case will eventually turn on whether she was too drunk to give consent.
Was it consent? Or, just consent?
Cornell is gross.
One of the men was unconscious, woke up and this ‘victim’ was performing oral sex on him without his consent. He filed a complaint that wasn’t even addressed. She did exactly to him what she is accusing the men of doing to her. SHE needs to stand trial.
Cornell is gross.
Cornell is gross.
Cornell is gross.
“ and makes the case for terminating women’s suffrage if they can’t get it together.”
Indeed it does.
L
The woman gave consent at the time.
The woman put down in writing, the next day, that it was consensual.
But a week later she changed her mind, decided to take back her consent for the stuff that happened a week ago, and then it became rape.
And women in our society wonder why they can’t get dates, why men won’t approach them in public, and why men are just walking away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.