Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kamala Harris Slams Supreme Court Ruling Voiding Race-Based Gerrymandering: ‘Guts The Voting Rights Act’
Breitbart ^ | April 29, 2026 | Elizabeth Weibel

Posted on 04/29/2026 5:25:32 PM PDT by Red Badger

Former Vice President Kamala Harris criticized the Supreme Court’s ruling in which a race-based redistricting map in Louisiana was struck down, stating that the ruling “guts the Voting Rights Act.”

In a post on X, Harris expressed that the ruling was “an outrage,” and added that it was “part of an agenda that conservatives set in place decades ago to steal power from everyday people.” Harris also stated that the “court’s decision is motivated by politics and designed to give an upper hand” to President Donald Trump and the Republican Party.

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling guts the Voting Rights Act and turns back the block on the foundational promise of equality and fairness in our election systems,” Harris wrote. “Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was one of the last remaining protections for Black and brown voters against maps deliberately drawn to dilute their political power. That protection has been stripped away.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: affimrativeracism; affirmativeaction; commieshasthesads; democratracism; democratshasthesads; democrtattracists; kamala; scotus; vra

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2026 5:25:32 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Kamala always gets lippy after a box of wine. Sad.


2 posted on 04/29/2026 5:26:30 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck ( Neocons in love with the Ukraine War hate how long the Iran War is taking..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So this means blacks can’t vote?


3 posted on 04/29/2026 5:26:47 PM PDT by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Kneepads wouldn’t comment on this if she wasn’t going to try and get installed again. She’s a divisive racist


4 posted on 04/29/2026 5:28:12 PM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

They are telling their base that they cannot vote for the candidate of their choice. But do not explain how that is possible...........


5 posted on 04/29/2026 5:28:33 PM PDT by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Race is al that matters to a racist


6 posted on 04/29/2026 5:33:11 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The 1965 voting rights act states discrimination based on race is illegal.

The left ran with it and only took one side of the defined word “discrimination”.

Establishing congressional districts based on race also means you cannot give an ADVANTAGE to however the black minority typically votes (Democratic).

The assumed ONLY use of the word “discrimination” at the time the law was passed was to prevent manipulating the boundaries to DISADVANTAGE and neuter the black minority vote.

No discrimination based on race means no advantage OR disadvantage to give the black minority more vote effect OR less vote effect.

No discrimination works both ways.


7 posted on 04/29/2026 5:34:49 PM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Hey if the left were to just deport all the millions they brought here for congressional seats this would all be solved, 25 congressional seats they did not earn, they stuffed the districts full of illegals giving them seats


8 posted on 04/29/2026 5:35:14 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Can you eliminate the 16th Amendment while you are at it?


9 posted on 04/29/2026 5:36:57 PM PDT by bray (Thank God for Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Of course.


10 posted on 04/29/2026 5:38:39 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

Then do the 19th and the 17th.

L


11 posted on 04/29/2026 5:40:23 PM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Free at last! Free at last to finally say any damn thing that pops into her feeble mind!


12 posted on 04/29/2026 5:46:02 PM PDT by bigbob (We are all Charlie Kirk now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
...... What part of "Race Based" anything is Racist and Unconstitutional does the Democrat Party not understand???

.

13 posted on 04/29/2026 5:47:09 PM PDT by R_Kangel ("A nation of sheep will beget a nation ruled by wolves")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I think the Voting Rights Act was gutted about 10 years ago by a previous Supreme Court ruling.


14 posted on 04/29/2026 5:49:39 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"Kamala Harris Slams Supreme Court Ruling Voiding Race-Based Gerrymandering: ‘Guts The Voting Rights Act’"

She is setting up her basest to do as they are told.
15 posted on 04/29/2026 5:49:43 PM PDT by clearcarbon (Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

The rat politburo know, but they pretend not to k ow, that when medicine has had the intended cure, you stop administering it. That’s what this decision did


16 posted on 04/29/2026 5:56:12 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (25 years on Free Republic, 12/10/25! More than 12,750 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Finally!!!


17 posted on 04/29/2026 5:59:03 PM PDT by volare737 ( Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Glad you posted this because it represents how far the country has descended into the pits of grievance and entitlement. Harris’s post is factually misleading, legally backwards, and steeped in the very racial essentialism it pretends to oppose. It drips with entitlement by demanding government-engineered racial outcomes in elections rather than neutral rules where voters of every background compete equally. By the Court’s rejecting the idea that government must sort voters into racial buckets to guarantee group outcomes is a political and cultural sea change. Taking our country back! This calls for bourbon.


18 posted on 04/29/2026 6:03:01 PM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

that was the point!

it is WAY past time to gut that unconstitutional piece of crap


19 posted on 04/29/2026 6:04:55 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“So this means blacks can’t vote?”

It means their votes now carry the same weight as everyone else, to the dismay of Kamala who can’t stand that reality.


20 posted on 04/29/2026 6:18:41 PM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson