Posted on 12/27/2025 4:48:00 PM PST by bitt
As Hillary Clinton closed in on the presidential nomination in the spring of 2016, FBI field officers advised colleagues at headquarters to press her on the foreign donations flowing to the Clinton Foundation while she steered American foreign policy and whether she had used the charity as a campaign piggy bank.
But the FBI HQ in Washington — a city in which the former secretary of state and first lady wields enormous influence — let the trail go cold.
FBI New York Assistant Director in Charge Diego Rodriguez advised agents in Washington to ask Clinton several questions about the foundation, which are reproduced in full in documents released to the Senate Judiciary Committee by the FBI and published on Dec. 15. The questions reveal the concerns about foreign bribery that the Clinton Foundation case — codenamed “Cracked Foundation” — had uncovered.
Among the evidence available to investigators, according to their questions: A recorded conversation between Clinton and Indian hotel magnate Sant Singh Chatwal in which Clinton discussed donations to the foundation and her remaining 2008 campaign debt. The new documents confirm that the FBI had at one time been “intercepting individuals associated with the Clinton Foundation.”
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
p
Not too late to lock her up.
She must have lost her usefulness.
Maybe I missed it, but I think the essence of the article is that some people in the FBI wanted to ask tough questions, and wanted to get Hillary on tape talking about donations -- but that the actual FBI agents who questioned Hillary on tape refused to ask her any tough questions.
Not much here. Unless I read it wrong.
Hillary was the biggest fund raiser the Dems ever had. That’s called “Power”.
Foreign diplomats who wanted to schedule a meeting with Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State were told that all of Hillary’s scheduling was done by the Clinton Foundation and that they needed to the Clinton Foundation to set up a meeting with her in her official capacity as Sec of State
You know how long I’ve been waiting (with other people here) for something like this?
Hope it’s not another cruel tease.
Kamala learned from Hillary’s mistake of using foreign donations. Kamala tapped domestic funds; Tim Walz and his network of SOMALI FRAUDSTERS !!!
I don’t know I think Obama really weaponized gov’t to support the Democrats. US AID while a fraud went on overdrive giving kickbacks to democrats.
Yet nobody did anything. Typical.
You know how long I’ve been waiting (with other people here) for something like this?
Hope it’s not another cruel tease.
***********************
The answer to your statement is, of course you know it is another cruel tease. Nothing will ever happen to Hillary; she is above the law. The FBI agents who did not ask tough questions avoided Arkancide.
When Hillary is in a pink jumpsuit, I will believe this drivel. Not going to happen, as law fare only works one way—against republicans, aided and abetted by republicans themselves.
What a clown show; look at Brazil and what they did to Jair Bolsonaro. Trump is currently the exception, but look what he had to go through and is still going through.God bless Trump.
Did they ask anything about Cattle Futures ?
Remind me what Paul Manafort was convicted for?
Thanks for your post.
“I have always depended on the kindness of strangers.”
((spoken by the tragic heroine Blanche DuBois at the end of Tennessee Williams’ iconic play, A Streetcar Named Desire, as she is led away to a mental institution, revealing her desperate reliance on others for survival and protection.))
…and….?
‘Talking’ and ‘taking’ are miles apart legally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.