Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump asks the Supreme Court to clear the way for federal downsizing plans
AP News ^ | Updated 1:37 PM CDT, June 2, 2025 | MARK SHERMAN

Posted on 06/02/2025 12:17:56 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday renewed its request for the Supreme Court to clear the way for plans to downsize the federal workforce, while a lawsuit filed by labor unions and cities proceeds.

The high court filing came after an appeals court refused to freeze a California-based judge’s order halting the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency.

By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the downsizing could have broader effects, including on the nation’s food-safety system and health care for veterans.

In her ruling last month, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston found that Trump’s administration needs congressional approval to make sizable reductions to the federal workforce.

The administration initially asked the justices to step in last month, but withdrew its appeal for technical, legal reasons. The latest filing is one in a series of emergency appeals arguing federal judges had overstepped their authority.

Illston’s order “rests on the indefensible premise that the President needs explicit statutory authorization from Congress to exercise his core Article II authority to superintend the internal personnel decisions of the Executive Branch,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the new appeal.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: labor; lawfare; scotus; undermining; workforce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 06/02/2025 12:17:56 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump is pushing the envelope; I heard he just got the court to overrule the lower court’s judge who said he couldn’t go to the White House bathrooms without his permission.


2 posted on 06/02/2025 12:25:30 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

I hear the judge is still debating moving his bed time from 9 pm to 10 pm.


3 posted on 06/02/2025 12:32:27 PM PDT by cableguymn (Can't cancel all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

Ha.

Trump is up doing things except for around 4 hours of sleep.


4 posted on 06/02/2025 12:36:02 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Nearly the entire Trump administration being run by judicial decisions. NOT what I voted for.


5 posted on 06/02/2025 12:37:34 PM PDT by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What if Trump from the very beginning ignored these lower court rulings, all two hundred of them? Not sure if that would be such a great strategy either. Trump is letting the courts completely fail first, before he takes Executive action. He can then say he gave the courts every opportunity to do the right thing and they failed. Politically, it’s better. Let the courts completely delegitimize themselves first.


6 posted on 06/02/2025 12:56:56 PM PDT by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

Too bad the rest of the administration is NOT keeping up the pace.


Ha.

Trump is up doing things except for around 4 hours of sleep.


7 posted on 06/02/2025 1:01:22 PM PDT by Dacula
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McCarthysGhost
Not sure if that would be such a great strategy either.

They could brand him as a dictator and half the population would agree.

8 posted on 06/02/2025 1:13:24 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McCarthysGhost

Trump’s actions are judged by “we the people” and how WE feel about his actions are expressed at election time. The judicial branch is currently robbing all citizens of their Constitutional right to express and implement their will and intentions GUARANTEED to us in Article IV, Section 4. By allowing this to continue, Trump is as guilty as they are. This issue MUST be dealt with.


9 posted on 06/02/2025 1:26:47 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The decision was not within the Article III judicial power.

Scotus should spend half an hour most on this nonsense.


10 posted on 06/02/2025 1:29:41 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It would also create a bunch of new plaintiffs, government workers, government contractors, and local and state governments. It would give them clear legal avenues for fighting The President’s policies and of course, impeachments where even rinos would have an excuse to vote for removal.


11 posted on 06/02/2025 1:34:16 PM PDT by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Totally agree except for the part about blaming Trump. We are currently in the middle of a communist revolution in America. Trump needs to proceed carefully. He will not let the communist courts derail his presidency.


12 posted on 06/02/2025 1:50:28 PM PDT by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

For people wondering about the deficit.


13 posted on 06/02/2025 1:53:25 PM PDT by Fai Mao ( All Democrats are pedophiles )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McCarthysGhost

Trump swore an oath to obey and protect the Constitution from ALL enemies, foreign and domestic. He must explain to the nation what Article IV, Section 4 means to them and how critical enforcing it is to keeping the power of defining the future in the hands of we the people. This is NOT about him. It is about us as a free nation.


14 posted on 06/02/2025 2:47:04 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the downsizing could have broader effects, including on the nation’s food-safety system and health care for veterans.”

So now judges are fortune tellers. The question before the judges should be whether Trump (or any other president) acted within his authority when reducing the workforce of federal agencies. Not on the possible outcome of such reduction. That would be a legal challenge for another day if it was shown such effects were a result.


15 posted on 06/02/2025 2:47:56 PM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

What precisely do you want him to do? The Republican Congress refuses to act. SCOTUS refuses to act. You do realize that the entire government is looking to take Trump down.

You want him to give a speech and ignore the judiciary. I wonder how Congress would respond. They would probably respond with threats of impeachment and by shutting down Trump’s legislative agenda.

Other than Trump, the U.S. government has become a lawless, corrupt, and traitorous. They have sold out their own country. The way I see it Trump has two choices try to work within the system or go full on Pinochet. I’m not opposed to the Pinochet idea.

What concrete steps would you recommend?


16 posted on 06/02/2025 3:50:20 PM PDT by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: McCarthysGhost
Other than Trump, the U.S. government has become lawless, corrupt, and traitorous. They have sold out their own country. The way I see it Trump has two choices try to work within the system or go full on Pinochet. I’m not opposed to the Pinochet idea.

Works for me.

However, it will require control of military and police forces which Trump does not yet appear to have. Appearances matter in such things.

17 posted on 06/02/2025 4:25:25 PM PDT by flamberge (The times, they are a' changing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: McCarthysGhost

Since they don’t respect the “system” as defined and are using methodology outside the boundaries of legitimate Constitutional governance, I say there is no choice but to go full Pinochet. There simply is no “system” to work in as they have hijacked it and slanted it totally in their favor. In Butler, he said “Fight!”. It’s time to get in on.


18 posted on 06/02/2025 4:37:12 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

I know but those hours seem like something a judge would come up with


19 posted on 06/02/2025 4:38:21 PM PDT by cableguymn (Can't cancel all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
They could brand him as a dictator and half the population would agree.

This is their strategy. Lawfare for the rest of his term.

Or if Trump acts like Biden, then they'll accuse him of being a dictator.

With lawfare, they're just trying to run the clock out.

RINOs in Congress are following the same playbook they used in Trump's first term.

20 posted on 06/02/2025 4:41:13 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson