Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BOOM! Stephen Miller’s America First Legal Drops Bombshell Lawsuit Against Chief Justice John Roberts
Gateway Pundit, ^ | May. 6, 2025 | Jim Hᴏft

Posted on 05/06/2025 10:14:20 AM PDT by george76

Stephen Miller’s America First Legal (AFL) has filed a bombshell lawsuit against Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., in his capacity as Presiding Officer of the Judicial Conference of the United States, and Robert J. Conrad, Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

The lawsuit accuses the powerful duo of running what AFL describes as an “unconstitutional shadow agency” and violating federal transparency laws.

The lawsuit, filed on April 22, slams the Judicial Conference of the United States and its administrative arm—both overseen by Chief Justice Roberts—as rogue “executive agencies” that have collaborated with far-left lawmakers to wage lawfare against conservative Supreme Court justices.

According to the lawsuit viewed by The Gateway Pundit:

“For several years, the media and enterprising lawmakers have launched an onslaught to destroy the impartiality and political neutrality of Article III courts and, particularly, the Supreme Court. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh have all faced political and physical threats because of the politicization and weaponization of the law.

This lawfare has been led by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Hank Johnson, relying upon an ideologically favorable legacy media to falsely accuse Justices Thomas and Alito of ethical improprieties. Their aim was simple: to chill the judicial independence of these Supreme Court Justices.”

According to the explosive complaint, the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts — long presumed exempt from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) — have functioned more like executive agencies rather than neutral arms of the judiciary.

AFL argues that these entities must comply with FOIA because they exercise “executive powers,” including responding to congressional oversight and issuing binding regulations — all under the direction of Roberts himself.

AFL’s lawsuit stems from its FOIA requests for communications between these agencies and Whitehouse and Johnson, two of the most vocal Democrat crusaders against conservative justices.

After the agencies flatly denied the requests, claiming FOIA doesn’t apply to them, AFL took them to court.

“The Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office are central levers for Senator Whitehouse and Representative Johnson’s lawfare enterprise. The Conference and the Administrative Office have actively accommodated oversight requests from these congressmen concerning their allegations against Justices Thomas and Alito.

Under our constitutional tradition, accommodations with Congress are the province of the executive branch. The Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office are therefore executive agencies. Such agencies must be overseen by the President, not the courts. Judicial relief here not only preserves the separation of powers but also keeps the courts out of politics.

[…]

Courts definitively do not create agencies to exercise functions beyond resolving cases or controversies or administratively supporting those functions. But the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts does exactly that.

[…]

The Judicial Conference’s duties are executive functions and must be supervised by executive officers who are appointed and accountable to other executive officers.

Thus, the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office exercise executive functions and are accordingly subject to FOIA. Accordingly, their refusal to comply with AFL’s FOIA request is unlawful.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: afl; alito; americafirst; americafirstlegal; boom; chiefjustice; executivebranch; greggnunziata; gregnunziata; hankjohnson; hofthatersarefaggots; hoftlikesboys; homoshatehoft; impartiality; jcus; johnroberts; johnson; judicialconference; judiciary; kavanaugh; lawfare; lawyers; legislativebranch; miller; nunziata; robertconrad; robertjconrad; roberts; separationofpowers; sheldonwhitehouse; stephenmiller; thomas; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 05/06/2025 10:14:20 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

Hoft and Bombshell. Oh boy


2 posted on 05/06/2025 10:16:55 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

bkmk


3 posted on 05/06/2025 10:17:24 AM PDT by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

From GP, this could be series!


4 posted on 05/06/2025 10:18:41 AM PDT by Damifino (The true measure of a man is found in what he would do if he knew no one would ever find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Stephen Miller FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!
I love JD, but this is the one who should succeed Trump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


5 posted on 05/06/2025 10:20:57 AM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Good, they had this coming.


6 posted on 05/06/2025 10:23:34 AM PDT by abbastanza (Oh boy. Can't wait. Go nuts kids. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

7 posted on 05/06/2025 10:24:29 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I hope they make an example of him. Does he have Epstein flights?


8 posted on 05/06/2025 10:25:08 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

One of the corrupt RINO’s is Greg Nunziata. Anyone who earned with him should be fired.

He is the guy who pushed RINO judges under Trump.

He brags in his bio that he is responsible for Roberts appointment.

Per his bio:

“Gregg held a series of senior staff positions in the United States Senate. As a former Chief Nominations Counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Gregg played a key strategic role in the confirmation proceedings for scores of federal judges and executive branch appointees, including Chief Justice John Roberts...”


9 posted on 05/06/2025 10:34:18 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

this is how you play the lawfare game!!


10 posted on 05/06/2025 10:35:44 AM PDT by God luvs America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Stephen Miller is a very bad (that is, good) man!


11 posted on 05/06/2025 10:36:10 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Damifino

So, the information included in the article is untrue?

I guess I don’t understand your comment about The Gateway Pundit.


12 posted on 05/06/2025 10:55:39 AM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1997 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theo

btt


13 posted on 05/06/2025 10:57:18 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george76

I was very disappointed during the Bush Jr term when Roberts was named ‘chief’ justice over the conservatives already in the court. Always feared how Roberts would rule an any and all court decision. I was not wrong about him.


14 posted on 05/06/2025 11:14:53 AM PDT by adorno ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo

“I guess I don’t understand your comment about The Gateway Pundit.”

I think it has something to do with GP being wrong a lot. I also take a wait and see attitude when it comes to GP. It’s kind of like having our very own Huffington Post.


15 posted on 05/06/2025 11:18:51 AM PDT by Gary from Dayton (Army Vet 1986-1991 unburdened by what I was burdened by before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theo

They do this all the time. They don’t bother reading the story.


16 posted on 05/06/2025 11:19:59 AM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george76
Not going anywhere unless these are entities funded by Congress. And even then, unless their officials answer to the President they're part of the courts.

Congress could defund them.

17 posted on 05/06/2025 11:22:50 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gary from Dayton

Percent of the time, GP links to stories and adds commentary. If they got it wrong, it would only be because destroyed a link to was wrong. I actually don’t see them getting anything wrong very often.


18 posted on 05/06/2025 11:22:56 AM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: george76

Just wait until this case gets to the USSC! LOL

On the other hand wouldn’t all the members of the court have to recuse themselves.


19 posted on 05/06/2025 11:29:46 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

📌👀


20 posted on 05/06/2025 11:32:41 AM PDT by Varsity Flight ( "War by 🙏 thoe prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite warriors. 10.5.6.5 These Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson