Trump administration requests Supreme Court halt order from judge

JusttheNews ^ | 3/24/25 | Charlotte Hazard

[CFW]

The Trump administration filed an emergency appeal Monday to the Supreme Court asking it to halt a recent lower court ruling to rehire some federal workers laid off at federal agencies.

The administration said that the ruling should be put on hold because the judge didn't have authority to order 16,000 probationary employees be re-hired, according to The Associated Press.

The order was from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco.

The agencies at which the layoffs occurred were departments of Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Defense, Energy, Interior and Treasury.

[CFW]

Also, " Fed appeals court to hear case on judge halting Trump deporting accused gang members to El Salvador"

Federal Appeals Court to Hear..

[AndyJackson]

So when ACB and Roberts go AWOL again will you clear out their offices and start nominating replacements?

[gibsonguy]

The SC will pass using their no leap frogging dodge. Turns out it is illegal to lay off at will, probationary Democrat employees.

[Liz]

The Trump administration has weathered well over 100 lawsuits since late January. Last month alone, the courts imposed 15 injunctions against the president’s actions, dramatically outpacing judicial roadblocks former Presidents’ faced. This includes
<><>injunctions on Trump’s executive order to scrap birthright citizenship,
<><>the block on the president’s use of wartime power to deport Venezuelan gangbangers
<><>and more.

Trump’s legal team has petitioned the USSC to intervene and potentially pare back the lower courts’ ability to slap injunctions against his actions while litigation plays out.

[Liz]

According to the US Judges’ official “Code of Conduct,” judges should recuse themselves if a close relative might benefit from their decisions. To thwart President Trump, Judge Boasberg orders the return of planes carrying MS13 and Tren De Aragua violent gang members.

Are Boasberg’s rulings aligned with his daughter’s paycheck?
<><>his daughter works for Partners for Justice,
<><>Partners for Justice gets 76% of their cash flow from US tax dollars
<><>Partners for Justice aids the airborne criminals anti-deportation activities.

Btw, Boasberg’s wife runs an NGO funded by the notorious USAID.

[Biblebelter]

I think that will eventually be put front and center.

It seems Team Trump has been a bit hesitant to go after the daughter as Leavitt mentioned the wife but not the daughter last week.

That may be strategic.

If, as is being reported, this clown appears before Congress, then this should be one of the major clubs he is bludgeoned with.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Good article today on the Imperial Judiciary at American Thinker. Key excerpts:

…in 1803, the Court gave itself the ability to invalidate a law it deemed in conflict with the Constitution [Marbury v Madison]. Although the court would use that power only twice over America’s first 70 years, it would do so 50 times over the subsequent 75 years and over 125 times in the last 90 years. That trajectory not only reflects the extraordinary growth in the areas of American life into which the leviathan of government has inserted itself, but it also reflects a far more activist judiciary.

And how can we tell? Look at nationwide injunctions. Judges issued six nationwide injunctions against George Bush over eight years—one per every sixteen months he was in office. Barack Obama was the subject of 12 or one every eight months. In his first term, judges issued 64 nationwide injunctions, or one every 22 days. The courts retreated, with Joe Biden getting 14 or one every three months. Now, in his second term, Trump has received 12 in only six weeks; that is, one every four days.

Meanwhile, in the single four-year period of his first term, he faced more of these injunctions than every president in the previous 60 years combined! But the thing is, injunctions are found nowhere in the Constitution. Nonetheless, with almost 700 federal judges, activists can easily find fellow travelers who are more than willing to do their bidding.

The Imperial Judiciary Of The United States.

[circlecity]

The Supremes need to rule that a District Court does not have jurisdiction to enjoin acts occurring outside its district.

[TexasFreeper2009]

and that people not directly affected do not have standing as is usually the case.

[Liz]

Nice find.

[Tacrolimus1mg]

So... I can be fired with no cause at my job (it’s in our employee handbook) at ANY time, not just a probationary period, but they can’t while they’re probies? That’s the time they usually are fired, if at all.

I want a judge to protect my job for me. That’s not fair.

[kiryandil]

The New Supreme Court [aka the Northern District of California] outranks the old Supreme Court.

[FrankRizzo890]

And “equal treatment under the law” is definitely a thing.

[kiryandil]

“677 presidents”

[Vaduz]

Nepotism in action?

[Bob Wills is still the king]

“The Supremes need to rule that a District Court does not have jurisdiction to enjoin acts occurring outside its district.”
____________________________________________________________

This would also prevent federal judges, like Benetiz, from imposing nationwide injunctions on laws we believe infringe on the 2nd Amendment.

[Jacquerie]

That would do the trick.

Simple and Constitutional.

[UCANSEE2]

Seems like this Judge has a skeleton in every closet of his house.

[Iron Munro]

[af_vet_1981]

So when ACB and Roberts go AWOL again will you clear out their offices and start nominating replacements?

I'll take the Rubicon for $200 Alex.