Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Roberts Blasts Donald Trump in Rare Statement
Newsweek ^ | 3/18/25 | Gabe Whisnant

Posted on 03/18/2025 10:05:14 AM PDT by JonPreston

In a rare clash between the executive and judiciary, Chief Justice John Roberts dismissed calls for impeaching federal judges after President Donald Trump urged the removal of a judge who ruled against his deportation policies.

Roberts said in a statement, "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arrestandexecute; arrestjohnroberts; fartinjohnroberts; fjr; grin; hugefart; impeachjohnroberts; impeachroberts; judgewatch; judicialsedition; kritocracy; magafart; ourguyroberts; roberts; scotus; supremefart; supremewhoopycushion; thesupremefart; trumpalwaysright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last
Grinnin' John strikes back


1 posted on 03/18/2025 10:05:14 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

“The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

Throw a rope around your District judges or we will do it for you.

L


2 posted on 03/18/2025 10:06:16 AM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Not disagreement Justice Roberts. This is judicial abuse. The Judge is a usurper.


3 posted on 03/18/2025 10:07:03 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

SCOTUS aka Supreme Clowns of the US continue to prove that is exactly what they’ve become


4 posted on 03/18/2025 10:07:05 AM PDT by antidemoncrat ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

At least 95% of American lawyers are Maoists. At least 98% of American judges are Maoists.


5 posted on 03/18/2025 10:07:34 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

My GAYDAR is off the charts!!


6 posted on 03/18/2025 10:08:06 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Trump should have ignored the order while appealing. Impeachment should have been the final straw but it most likely would have never come to that point


7 posted on 03/18/2025 10:08:13 AM PDT by Sir_Humphrey (The “only Trumpers” are just as damaging to the conservative cause as are the “never Trumpers”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

This is out of the purview of the USSC. Roberts needs to stuff it.
This is a Legislative Branch issue.


8 posted on 03/18/2025 10:08:14 AM PDT by politicket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

What if the judge ignores the law and issues an order that breaks immigration law? The judge gave an unlawful order.


9 posted on 03/18/2025 10:08:37 AM PDT by duckbutt (I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

The Head Fart of The Supreme Fart weighs in.


10 posted on 03/18/2025 10:08:58 AM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

No sir, not going to accept that. ANY judge who rules in favor of illegal aliens on any matter makes himself a friend of illegal law-breakers and an enemy of the citizens over whom he has jursdiction. This can not stand. Call it what it is, TREASON.


11 posted on 03/18/2025 10:09:16 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Doesn’t Roberts realize that his inaction is undermining the court system...or is that intentional?


12 posted on 03/18/2025 10:09:40 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Were Roberts Adopted daughters facilitated by Epstein?


13 posted on 03/18/2025 10:09:41 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Looks like Deep State still has control of the SCOTUS...


14 posted on 03/18/2025 10:10:20 AM PDT by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Impeach Roberts. We have 3 years to replace him.


15 posted on 03/18/2025 10:10:46 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Do the math. L+G+B+T+Q = 66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Exactly. Who will raise from the dead victims of these gangbangers after judges release them?
Discipline your subordinates or someone else will.


16 posted on 03/18/2025 10:10:53 AM PDT by steve8714 (Latin Mass is beautiful. Even though the music wasn't written by pedo Jesuits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

This POS didn’t say a word after Schumer threatened Justices and the left talked of packing the court.


17 posted on 03/18/2025 10:11:05 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Impeachment is a legislative activity.

Perhaps it is inappropriate for the Executive to say “Let’s impeach this guy”.
But I would just as readily say that it is inappropriate for the Chief Justice to say “Hey, you shouldn’t impeach that guy”.

What we are seeing is people in the Legislative Branch saying, “I want this guy impeached” and that is 100% appropriate. It probably won’t result in a judge being removed (it’s a high bar) but it is the right approach. So Roberts seems to be needlessly inserting himself into the political process. He’s biased, and that’s no surprise.


18 posted on 03/18/2025 10:11:19 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Must be working keep it up.


19 posted on 03/18/2025 10:11:30 AM PDT by MagillaX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Roberts is going to have to recuse himself if this case gets to SCOTUS.


20 posted on 03/18/2025 10:11:48 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Do the math. L+G+B+T+Q = 66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson