Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A federal judge intends to press the Trump administration on whether it violated his order on deportation flights.
The New York Times ^ | March 17, 2025 | Alan Feuer and Zolan Kanno-Youngs

Posted on 03/17/2025 11:12:06 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

A federal judge in Washington plans to press the Trump administration at a hearing on Monday about whether it has violated an order he issued barring officials from removing any detained noncitizens — including several suspected Venezuelan gang members — from the country with little or no due process.

The hearing was scheduled by the judge, James E. Boasberg, even as President Trump’s so-called border czar, Tom Homan, made defiant remarks on television, indicating that the administration planned to continue such deportations despite the court’s order — an action that could thrust the country into a constitutional crisis, pitting one of the coequal branches of the government against another.

“We’re not stopping,” Mr. Homan said Monday, during an appearance on Fox News. “I don’t care what the judges think, I don’t care what the left thinks. We’re coming.”

Mr. Homan defended the administration’s decision to fly more than 200 immigrants to El Salvador over the weekend, including individuals the government identified as members of the Tren de Aragua criminal gang. He added that the public should expect more deportation flights “every day.”

The legal battle over the removal of the immigrants was the latest — and perhaps most serious — flashpoint yet between federal courts, which have sought to curb many of Mr. Trump’s recent executive actions, and an administration that has repeatedly come close to openly refusing to comply with judicial orders.

Mr. Trump himself expressed skepticism about a ruling last week by a federal judge in California ordering the administration to rehire thousands of fired probationary workers. Mr. Trump told reporters on Sunday night that the judge was “putting himself in the position of the president of the United States, who was elected by close to 80 million votes.”

The hearing in the deported immigrant case was scheduled...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: article2; elsalvador; interference; judgesgonewild; judgewatch; judicialcoup; judicialmisconduct; noauthority; nojurisdiction; powertrippingweenie; stayinyourlanejudge; unlawfulorders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
Mississippi v. Johnson (1867) already decided that the judicial branch has no power over how the Executive runs the Executive Branch.


1 posted on 03/17/2025 11:12:06 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What’s he gonna do.....put the Trump administration on double secret probation?


2 posted on 03/17/2025 11:13:32 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yeah right, dig deeper jacka$$, expose yourself more.


3 posted on 03/17/2025 11:14:06 AM PDT by pacificus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

4 posted on 03/17/2025 11:15:17 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats do not object to government corruption as long as they get a cut of the loot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The answer to this is to load up another plane with these animals.


5 posted on 03/17/2025 11:15:33 AM PDT by right way right (“May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

a better case the libs should use is what just happened to the transplant surgeon. I believe she was still on US soil when the Judge ordered her to stay while he reviewed the situation.

Here is why she was deported

Libs of TikTok
@libsoftiktok
Rasha Alawieh, a Lebanese doctor and Brown University professor here on a visa, just got DEPORTED after feds found out she attended a funeral for HEZBOLLAH TERROR CHIEF Hassan Nasrallah in Lebanon.

Chillin Effect
@ChillinEffect
More details:

“Rasha Alawieh was questioned about multiple photos she had on her phone of Hasssan Nasrallah, a leader of the terrorist organization in Lebanon, Hezbollah…In explaining why these multiple photos were deleted by her one to two days before she arrived at Logan Airport, she stated that she did not want to give authorities the perception that she supports Hezbollah and the Ayatollah politically or militarily,” 🤦‍♂️


6 posted on 03/17/2025 11:16:32 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

so the judge is saying it was illegal to take these individuals (who came into the country illegally) out of the country?


7 posted on 03/17/2025 11:17:14 AM PDT by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The judge should be made to explain why he refuses to adhere to clear Supreme Court precedence of Mississippi v. Johnson or immediately vacate his previous order.

The Executive Branch has an inherent right to interpret existing law. PDJT made clear that the AG and he himself are so authorized. (That is, not just anyone in the Executive Branch is authorized to do so.)


8 posted on 03/17/2025 11:17:33 AM PDT by rx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

9 posted on 03/17/2025 11:17:37 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Impeach this bum!


10 posted on 03/17/2025 11:18:03 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (The Bible speaks truth! Don't believe it, you do so at your own peril. You'd better be right!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hey SCOTUS, get off your lazy asses and fix this. This IS a Constitutional crisis


11 posted on 03/17/2025 11:18:05 AM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ghost of nixon
It was legal when FJB flew planeloads of illegals into the country, but illegal when Trump flew them out.

It's simple logic. 🤡

12 posted on 03/17/2025 11:19:05 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats do not object to government corruption as long as they get a cut of the loot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Tom Holman deserves the Medal of Freedom for his efforts.


13 posted on 03/17/2025 11:19:13 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (The Bible speaks truth! Don't believe it, you do so at your own peril. You'd better be right!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yeah, I don’t remember voting for Judge whatever the f*ck his name is.


14 posted on 03/17/2025 11:19:39 AM PDT by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Some unelected POS has no athority over the President of the United States.

Unless you’re a total POS like Amy.

Amy the worthless. Amy the girl who thought she could upend the constitution, the one she swore to uphold.

Amy, the total C.

...and just when John call it a tax in the face of Government can not forcibly charge for services.

He’s a piker to John with her 677 tyrants in black ropes ruling.

The only question is how much was she paid buy our enemies to sell out America?


15 posted on 03/17/2025 11:20:15 AM PDT by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic

Trump has sworn an oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution ... and the Judicial Branch — including the USSC, thus far — is doing everything it can to prevent him from doing so!


16 posted on 03/17/2025 11:20:50 AM PDT by glennaro (2025: The year of America's rebirth as a Great (and Free) Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I see that the NYT is going to keep on this hoping the democrats use it as an excuse to impeach Trump.


17 posted on 03/17/2025 11:21:53 AM PDT by I want the USA back (America is once again GREAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In a system replete with checks and balances, what is the check against this America hating Judge? Impeachment? Insurrection? Treason? Something else?


18 posted on 03/17/2025 11:22:16 AM PDT by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic

That’s one option. Probably the least dramatic.

Other options include:

The executive branch can ignore rulings which violate the constitution.

Congress can remove justices from office who rule in violation of the constitution.

Who will act first?


19 posted on 03/17/2025 11:23:37 AM PDT by TheDon (Remember the J6 political prisoners! Remember Ashli Babbitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Did this judge have a written signed court order delivered and handed directly to the President by the judge or his designee? If not then how was the President supposed to know exactly what the judge ordered and how to respond? Can’t expect the President to be directed by press reports.


20 posted on 03/17/2025 11:23:50 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson