Skip to comments.
HHS issues new definitions of terms like ‘sex,’ ‘man’ and ‘woman’ that critics say ignore science (CNN)
CNN ^
| February 20, 2025
| Jen Christensen,
Posted on 02/20/2025 9:11:33 AM PST by Salman
In one of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s first moves as secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, the agency released guidance Wednesday for the US government, external partners and the public that offers a narrower definition of sex than the ones used by many scientists and that aligns with a January executive order signed by President Donald Trump.
The department also launched a website promoting these definitions and created a video defending a ban on transgender women participating in women’s sports.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cnn; gender; hhs; homosexualagenda; prolife; rfkjr; robertfkennedyjr; transbs; transgender; transinsanity; whatisawoman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Clarifications:
1) Restored the old definitions which at one time did not have to be made explicit in law and regulation.
2) Emphasis added. Ignoring many scientists is not ignoring science. The alternative involves ignoring other scientists.
1
posted on
02/20/2025 9:11:33 AM PST
by
Salman
To: Salman
perversion is a behavior, it is not an identity.
2
posted on
02/20/2025 9:17:49 AM PST
by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are no longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
To: Salman
Sanity seems so foreign and yet so refreshing.
3
posted on
02/20/2025 9:18:05 AM PST
by
fwdude
(Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left?)
To: Salman
“that critics say ignore” mental illness.
4
posted on
02/20/2025 9:18:07 AM PST
by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: Salman
California is going to have a hard time interfacing with the federal government now because they’ve “de-gendered” all language in their legal statues and documents.
5
posted on
02/20/2025 9:19:24 AM PST
by
fwdude
(Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left?)
To: Salman
The executive order was correct. Scientifically rigid definition is by the sex cells the organism is organized to produce.
It’s either sperm or eggs.
The high school biology case of XX or XY works for 99.99% of the cases, but the sperm or eggs based definition works for all.
6
posted on
02/20/2025 9:21:25 AM PST
by
Krosan
To: PeterPrinciple
7
posted on
02/20/2025 9:22:10 AM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Salman
“Ignore science”? Hahahahahaha
8
posted on
02/20/2025 9:28:05 AM PST
by
Marko413
To: PeterPrinciple
“that critics say ignore science (CNN)“
CNN -trash. On one side is 80% on the other stands the evil, the insane and CNN.
9
posted on
02/20/2025 9:32:50 AM PST
by
iamgalt
To: Salman
X and X is a girl.
X and Y is a guy.
10
posted on
02/20/2025 9:36:25 AM PST
by
Psalm 73
("You'll never hear surf music again" - J. Hendrix)
To: Salman
The same people that say “believe the science”, are the ones who also say a man is a woman if he says so...
Why show I ever ‘believe the science” ever again?
11
posted on
02/20/2025 9:39:11 AM PST
by
packrat35
(Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
To: Psalm 73; AFB-XYZ
12
posted on
02/20/2025 9:46:13 AM PST
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration; The acronym defines the science.)
To: Psalm 73
my personal fave from kindergarten cop...”boys have a penis. girls have a vagina “
13
posted on
02/20/2025 9:47:24 AM PST
by
Qwapisking
("The left will rue the day they cheated Trump out of the 2020 election forever" L.Star )
To: Salman
Science is not based on feelings.
14
posted on
02/20/2025 10:05:37 AM PST
by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus)
To: Qwapisking
But according to dems... it ain’t necessarily so.
15
posted on
02/20/2025 10:36:11 AM PST
by
Beowulf9
( )
To: Salman
“ones used by many scientists”
And, also used by many morons.
16
posted on
02/20/2025 10:40:00 AM PST
by
anton
To: Salman
Can anyone name more than two sexes?
17
posted on
02/20/2025 10:49:29 AM PST
by
bray
(It's not racist to be racist against races the DNC hates.)
To: Salman
Lol. Psychology is pseudoscience. They just make shyt up.
18
posted on
02/20/2025 11:27:39 AM PST
by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: bray
Can anyone name more than two sexes?
= = =
Maybe, back on my young days, there may have been more than two sexes.
19
posted on
02/20/2025 11:40:18 AM PST
by
Scrambler Bob
(Running Rampant, and not endorsing nonsense; My pronoun is EXIT. And I am generally full of /S)
To: Salman
Better than ignoring reality!
20
posted on
02/20/2025 11:43:42 AM PST
by
TonyM
(Score Event)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson