Posted on 11/19/2024 3:04:15 PM PST by george76
The newly approved ordinance would also prohibit “any city resources, property or personnel from being utilized for any federal immigration enforcement."..
The Los Angeles City Council Tuesday adopted a sanctuary city ordinance that prohibits the use of city resources in immigration enforcement, including cooperating with federal immigration agents as the incoming Trump administration hints at immigration crackdown.
The city council passed the motion unanimously to codify the protective measures after City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto and Mayor Karen Bass expedited the draft ordinance last week.
Because the measure was passed with an urgency clause, the sanctuary city statute will go into effect immediately as soon as Mayor Bass gives final approval.
While former Mayor Eric Garcetti issued an executive directive in 2019 to protect immigrants, and the LAPD officers are already prohibited from asking people’s immigration status when making arrests, Tuesday’s ordinance, which was initially proposed in 18 months ago, will officially put the sanctuary policy in the city’s books.
"We know often members of our immigration community – even without this (Trump) administration – have lived in fear and have consequently among the highest rates of underreporting of crime, assaults or violence," Councilmember Monica Rodriguez said. "We don’t have a safer city if people are living in fear and hiding in the shadows and unable to come forward and cooperate with law enforcement in manners that we need them to particularly because we want to keep them safe."
Incoming City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, who represents part of South Los Angeles, that codifying the city's sanctuary city status to maintain "peace" and "productivity."
"In my district, a house catches on fire, and no one calls the fire department because nobody wants to invite the government in and risk deportation," Harris-Dawson said. "(The ordinance) codifies that and puts us in a position to scaffold and build up on that to maintain Los Angeles as the kind of place where we can all live in peace, we can continue our productivity and where we can lead the nation as a city of immigrants."
The newly approved ordinance would also prohibit “any city resources, property or personnel from being utilized for any federal immigration enforcement,'' as well as city cooperation with federal immigration authorities in “execution of their duties'' as it pertains to immigration enforcement.
It would also prohibit Los Angeles officials and agencies from directly or indirectly sharing data with immigration authorities.
...
Newly appointed Los Angeles Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell has said the department would not engage in immigration enforcement. He has remained steadfast in that position.
Last week, Tom Homan, who has been tapped to be Trump's new "border czar,'' said during an appearance on "Fox & Friends'' that "Nothing will stop us from deporting migrant criminals.''
Homan addressed sanctuary jurisdictions, using New York City as an example and noting that, ``If we can't get assistance from New York City, we may have to double the number of agents we send to New York City. Because we're going to the job with you or without you.''
He also suggested that the president withhold federal funding to sanctuary jurisdictions.
While Trump representatives did not immediately comment on the prospect of Los Angeles passing a sanctuary ordinance, Roxanne Hoge, communications director for the L.A. County Republican Party, last week criticized the concept of sanctuary cities and states.
"A country without secure borders isn't a country at all,'' Hoge said in a statement. "The protections they offer aren't for abuelas (grandmothers) getting ice cream, they're for people who've entered the country illegally and committed additional crimes. Whether drunk driving, robbery, sexual violence, assault or murder, none of those should go unpunished,'' she added. "Perpetrators should definitely not be protected by the largesse taken from hard-working taxpayers.''
Sanctuary cities aren’t for immigrants, they’re for invaders.
Why must NBC lie?
Should we allow Los Angeles (and California) back into the United States someday if they reform and repent?
Not gonna help.
The federal government is tasked with immigration, and any
small time idiot outside the White House stands a good chance
of going up on federal or military tribunal charges if they
aren’t careful.
Frankly, they can take the whole LA City Council with them if
they like.
I’ll start this off. The city will become more and more isolated and broke as more migrants pour in using government services. L.A. Will become the “New Delhi” of the western world. Full of shit and people living in tin shacks.
I think I read that Sanctuary cities are going to be done away with in the new admin.
How much Federal money do they get now for illegal immigrants? That will change in a hurry.
Give China a ten year lease on the city.
They will fix the problem.
Lol.
SCOTUS will side with Trump. They know that. Last gasps of dying Democrat Party.
DJT, recommend all illegals move to blue jurisdictions. Flood those cities and states with these people, cut off all federal aid to illegals and then let them come crawling to you to remove them.
The Left can't stop lying.
Trump and others like governors (when not the perps themselves) should’ve arrested these mayors and councilmen for violating fed laws.
Cut off all federal $$!
“Immigrants” are fully protected by the law already. What this law does is attempt to prevent illegals from being deported.
I’m sorry, since when was immigration law a matter of local ordinance?
Start promoting that LA is the place to go. Because ICE will be deporting folks everywhere else.
Overwhelm their system. It will either destroy the city, or the people will have enough.
Trump will get around to it…somewhere around year 4.
The L.A. County Sheriff is NOT bound by these rules.
And passed by the same gang that always screams “only dee federal goberment can make dee eemmeegration law!” when someone tries to make a State law - like Arizona SB1070 - that they don’t like.
Heads they win, tails we lose. Kinda the way they think it should be.
LA should tread very lightly in this regard. In order to process criminal aliens for removal ICE needs court records that establish grounds for removal.
Refusal to share such documents IS obstruction of justice.
Keep playing your stupid game California, you are about to win a really big stupid prize.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.