Posted on 09/25/2024 5:10:41 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Revolver News first started critically covering the January 6 pipe bomb story in March of 2021. Now, nearly three and a half years and several ground-breaking investigative reports later, the scandalous story of the January 6 pipe bombs is firmly established as one of the two major smoking guns of what we have come to call the Fedsurrection. As though this weren’t significant enough, the pipe bomb story elevated still further in its significance with the release of surveillance footage of the discovery of the DNC bomb, overwhelmingly suggesting that Kamala Harris’ Secret Service detail is at the very least in on the cover-up. Indeed, Kamala Harris’ own refusal to acknowledge her narrow brush with the DNC pipe bomb seems to defy any innocent explanation (after all, shouldn’t it be a key talking point of hers that she almost lost her life to terrorism on January 6?). The Secret Service of course gained renewed attention in the aftermath of its suspicious and potentially deliberate failures enabling the assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, PA. Kamala Harris has, of course, become Trump’s opponent in the 2024 race. Thus, the inclusion of both the Secret Service and Kamala Harris in the pipe bomb story elevates it to one of the most consequential scandals and cover-ups in the country.
For the past eight months, ever since the publication of our bombshell piece detailing the significance of Capitol Police surveillance footage detailing the discovery of the DNC pipe bomb, the lion’s share of attention the pipe bomb story has received has largely centered around footage obtained from Capitol Police security cameras. Prior to the game-changing release of this Capitol Police footage, most of our critical attention was directed toward the implausibly bizarre circumstances surrounding the bombs’ discovery, as well as utterly damning conclusions regarding the DNC’s own surveillance footage.
With the pipe bomb story in its final stages of resolution, we believe it is time to return our attention to the question of the DNC’s surveillance of the pipe bomber. The first thing to recall about the DNC footage is that it was the DNC’s footage that the FBI chose to use in the clips that it showed the public of the pipe bomber near the site where the bomb was planted. That’s right. The footage that the FBI released to the public to help identify the pipe bomber does not come from the Capitol Police cameras, but rather the DNC itself.
At first, this would seem to make sense. We learn from the aforementioned Capitol Police footage depicting the discovery of the DNC bomb that these cameras in question seemed to have an initial blindspot with respect to the bench where the pipe bomb was actually planted. It was only after the pipe bomb was discovered and presumably radioed into whoever was manning the security cameras that the camera pans over to the bench area where the pipe bomb was.
The following image is a screenshot depicting the frame of view from the Capitol Police camera in question. The bench where the pipe bomb was planted is off of the screen to the right (not visible in this shot).
(Excerpt) Read more at Revolver.com ...
We got them now! What a fricking farce!
I have no idea what they mean.
Both parties supported the J6 crackdown and unprecedented prosecution.
People need to understand this. That’s why over 4 years later the number of undercover agents will be unknown and the plan is to not answer until after the Election is over.
The DC U.S. Atty was only asked by Republicans how hard he’ll go after J6 attendees, he went on to refuse to allow charges against Hunter Biden in his district. And the $28 Million to the Biden’s was ignored.
The support for Matthew Graves / DC was bi-partisan. In the committee, no one voted against him.
Does Jack Smith know about this?
Trump could bring this up again and again, why doesn’t he? He could have asked her about it on stage at the debate. He could do a second debate just to ask her this.
“Trump could bring this up again and again, why doesn’t he? He could have asked her about it on stage at the debate. He could do a second debate just to ask her this.”
____________________________________________________________
January 6th was a bad look for Trump. He’d be stupid to bring it up again himself.
Then ask him how many of them have been identified, charged, or arrested.
The answer is ONLY ONE of them has been identified, charged, and arrested.
ALL of the others are FED Stooges!
Or is that racist now?
I don’t remember, did January 6 come up in the Biden debate?
I really hate conspiracy theories but this is not one. Something is going on with this whole pipe bomb thing. Why else wouldn’t Harris talk about how close she was to death at DNC headquarters?
Yawn... Nothing will ever come of this. Just like Hillary or any other Democrat has never been arrested unless they fell out of favor with the DNC.
“We got them now! What a fricking farce!
Yawn... Nothing will ever come of this. Just like Hillary or any other Democrat has never been arrested unless they fell out of favor with the DNC.”
You were quoting Cat Owner. Apparently you don’t hang around FR very much. Cat Owner is our Eeyore. If she feels this is a big deal then (if you remember the old EF Hutton commercials) then we should be listening 😄
Crap. Did I just misinterp what CatOwner said?
Smollet was promised a get out of jail card. They lied.
Not in Smith's purview.
Matthew Graves … Reportedly Kammie’s pick for AG, if The Blob steals the election for her. UGH!
Bknk
Good point. But if brought up by his opponents (Harris or “moderators”) it would be good material for the response.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.