Skip to comments.
'Good luck' prying off her wedding ring, gay attorney general tells US Supreme Court at DNC
USA Today via Yahoo! News ^
| August 21, 2024
| Todd Spangler, USA TODAY NETWORK
Posted on 08/27/2024 8:38:03 AM PDT by fwdude
(Link Only due to copyright request.)
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: arrestdananessel; criminalag; dananessel; degenerate; domesticterrorist; enemieslist; gayterrorist; globohomo; homosexualagenda; samesexmirage; satan; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
These deviants are such drama queens. No one wants to get involved with their pretend "marriages," we just don't want to be forced to pretend along with them if the Supreme Court does the right thing.
1
posted on
08/27/2024 8:38:03 AM PDT
by
fwdude
To: fwdude
It’s always all about them. Homos are the biggest narcissist on the planet. Personality trait taken directly from thier dark lord and master. Pretty much the same for all Democrats. Demonic narcissism
To: Hammerhead
3
posted on
08/27/2024 8:42:32 AM PDT
by
No name given
( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
To: fwdude
4
posted on
08/27/2024 8:42:38 AM PDT
by
No name given
( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
To: fwdude
No man cares what you do, sexually as long as it doesn’t involve them.
To: Hammerhead
Every homosexual I’ve ever known in my life has been seriously emotionally and mentally arrested. One grown acquaintance in his fifties was virtually a child, throwing tantrums over the mildest perceived slight.
6
posted on
08/27/2024 8:47:54 AM PDT
by
fwdude
To: Robert DeLong
Involve meaning making me or my family pay for it in any way including social costs of accommodation or disease, being forced to watch it, or trying to educate, peddle, force it on or groom any minor children, mine included.
To: fwdude
As a native of Michigan, i can assure you, this woman is a special kind of evil.
8
posted on
08/27/2024 8:50:08 AM PDT
by
exnavy
To: AndyJackson
9
posted on
08/27/2024 8:50:47 AM PDT
by
No name given
( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
To: fwdude
10
posted on
08/27/2024 8:52:23 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(I'm a pure-blood!)
To: Robert DeLong
No man cares what you do, sexually as long as it doesn’t involve them.
Keep it away from our children, and don't scare the horses!
11
posted on
08/27/2024 8:52:30 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
To: exnavy
As a native of Michigan, i can assure you, this woman is a special kind of evil. And I'm convinced that she was only installed through election fraud.
12
posted on
08/27/2024 8:52:54 AM PDT
by
fwdude
To: fwdude
The filthy degenerate freak is going to get exactly what it deserves. In a dystopian world that they themselves created, those sick fetish cretins will be the first to go down in flames.
13
posted on
08/27/2024 8:56:31 AM PDT
by
Flavious_Maximus
(Tony Fauci will be put on death row and die of COVID!)
To: fwdude
Even if the Supreme Court ever reversed the decision on homosexual marriage, we have to remember that Congress passed the Respect For Marriage Act, which explicitly legalized homosexual marriage.
So even if ths Court decided there is not a constitutional right to homosexual marriage, there is still a legislative act which has defined marriage to include same sex couples.
To: fwdude
This is what a failed/collapsed society looks like.
To: fwdude
California divorce courts hated gay marriages.
The judges didn’t have a script for which wane to screw over.
It used to be simple.
Screw over the one with a penis...
16
posted on
08/27/2024 9:01:41 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Don't hallucinate and legislate, don't hallucinate and educate...)
To: Dilbert San Diego
The "Respect for Marriage Act" did indeed nullify DOMA, but there was an explicit provision contained in it acknowledging that if the Court reversed
Obergefell, then the federal government would still recognized them even if the states didn't.
In other words, the 30+ states with marriage amendments could then enforce their constitutional amendments.
17
posted on
08/27/2024 9:04:34 AM PDT
by
fwdude
To: Dilbert San Diego
https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2022513
Notice that the Democrat vote was unanimous while 39 Republicans broke ranks and supported the bill.
The party discipline of the Democrats is amazing to behold.
I wonder how they do it....
Lol.
18
posted on
08/27/2024 9:10:08 AM PDT
by
cgbg
("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
To: fwdude
Wear 10 rings and get a “certificate” from every country on Earth. It still won’t add up to being an actual marriage.
19
posted on
08/27/2024 9:12:05 AM PDT
by
NewJerseyJoe
(Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
To: fwdude
Not sure where the Constitution mentions marriage. The USSC would be right to punt it back to the States, like it did abortion. Leftist/Fascists hate this because it is easier to get one bill through the Fed govt than have to get 50 bills through the States.
20
posted on
08/27/2024 9:20:40 AM PDT
by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson