Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS Ruling Deems Trump’s New York Conviction Unconstitutional on Two Key Grounds
The People's Voice ^ | June 25, 2024 | Staff

Posted on 06/25/2024 9:17:23 AM PDT by Red Badger

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) delivered two precedent-setting rulings that could significantly impact former President Donald Trump’s criminal convictions.

In a decisive 6-3 decision in the Erlinger vs United States case, the Supreme Court ruled that juries must be unanimous on each criminal count, a standard not met in Trump’s New York case, where the jury returned a 4-4-4 verdict on the underlying crime.

This ruling underlines that Trump’s conviction was unconstitutional and must be overturned. During Trump’s New York trial, the judge had instructed the jury that unanimity on the specific crimes was unnecessary, as long as they agreed that a crime had taken place.

Additionally, SCOTUS ruled that sentencing enhancements cannot be arbitrarily implemented by judicial fiat, further solidifying the protections against unjust legal procedures.

These rulings have profound implications for Trump’s legal battles, particularly the controversial case led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and the bogus J6 1512(c) charges and sentencing enhancements that corrupt federal judges have announced they will implement if the Supreme Court nukes 1512(c).

The Supreme Court’s decisions underscore the necessity for unanimous jury verdicts in criminal convictions and proper judicial processes in sentencing enhancements, casting doubt on the validity of current and future proceedings against Trump.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bloggers; fakenews; gatorplant; immunity; reversibleerror; scotus; scotustrump; scouts; soctustrump; supremecourt; trump; trumppersecution; trumpscotus; trumpwasright; unanimous; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-234 next last
To: Red Badger; Sidebar Moderator

This is great news. Can we get this up on the “Breaking” sidebar?


41 posted on 06/25/2024 9:40:10 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobbo666

LOL How about “Above the fold”?


42 posted on 06/25/2024 9:40:19 AM PDT by halfright (Voter ID. No Exceptions. Paper Ballots and no voting before or after the election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And, THIS, is possibly why Roberts had fencing put up around the SCOTUS offices.

I wonder if DC police chief and head of US Army will provide security THIS time.


43 posted on 06/25/2024 9:41:43 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The headline is FAKE news bigtime.


44 posted on 06/25/2024 9:42:16 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

It’s FAKE news!!


45 posted on 06/25/2024 9:42:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The 4-4-4 division was just speculation by Jonathan Turley. We don’t know how the jurors voted on the felony part.


46 posted on 06/25/2024 9:43:03 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If I was to write Rabid Animal Control on a personal check payable to Free Republic, there would be no case for claiming falsification of a business record.


47 posted on 06/25/2024 9:43:30 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete Dovgan
The SCOTUS just told them so.

Indirectly, and by coincidence, that might be the case. But Erlinger vs US was not about Trump. It was heard by SCOTUS in Oct 23 and just last week ruled on. I aint no lawyer but I think Trumps lawyers have yet another arrow in their quiver to form appeals from, but I dont see how it kills Bragg's conviction today or tomorrow.

48 posted on 06/25/2024 9:43:56 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

Everyone knows the NY verdict was crap and will be overturned. But the point wasn’t to put Trump in jail, the point was to keep him from the White House.


49 posted on 06/25/2024 9:44:15 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There is a reason why the NY jury has not spoken one word about this case at all, because they were NOT unanimous on all counts, they just picked and choosed something til they came up with a guilty verdict and that is unconstitutional..remember, Trump is technically not considered a convicted felon til AFTER sentencing


50 posted on 06/25/2024 9:46:43 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just in time for debate.


51 posted on 06/25/2024 9:47:21 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Perfect timing.


52 posted on 06/25/2024 9:47:27 AM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks; kiryandil; Jim Robinson; rlmorel; sport; grey_whiskers; sauropod; Macho MAGA Man; ...
joesbucks, I know you still look for posts to you, even if you cannot comment.

This gives lie to the premise you consistently put forward: That Trump had a fair trial.

You were wrong then, and I suspect you knew it. Further, I suspect that in the face of this ruling, you STILL assert Trump had a fair trial.

It's what a democrat operative would do.

Good call, Jim. Keep the guy banned. 😊

PS: Not too fond of Fuzz either, but at least he's slightly more reasonable.

rlmorel
sport
grey_whiskers
sauropod
Macho MAGA Man
John S Mosby
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
MayflowerMadam
Robert DeLong
Lakeshark
Nervous Tick
Trump Girl Kit Cat
mlitefan
vivenne
ohioman
laplata
Chgogal

53 posted on 06/25/2024 9:50:16 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Trump's experience? We're next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

“Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust”

Does any state require a business license for such a trust?


54 posted on 06/25/2024 9:53:07 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

NOWHERE TO HIDE IF AMERICA IS LOST!

(5 MINUTES) https://youtu.be/dqw7kXG0kxU

LARRY GRATHWHOL (MARXIST CAMPS) (4 MINUTES)

https://youtu.be/15HSTmmWtJM

STALIN'S WARNING TO AMERICA

(2 MINUTES)

https://youtu.be/Iao12S_Wbc4

55 posted on 06/25/2024 9:54:51 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I wonder if this means the whole thing could be thrown out BEFORE the appeal....


56 posted on 06/25/2024 9:57:58 AM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

Done 👍


57 posted on 06/25/2024 10:00:49 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Fuzz

Heh, I can have the occasional discourse with Fuzz now and again, so you are right there!

That other person, well. I can always hope for that there.


58 posted on 06/25/2024 10:01:17 AM PDT by rlmorel (In Today's Democrat America, The $5 Dollar Bill is the New $1 Dollar Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

Tell that to the ninny’s airing ads saying “34 FELONY COUNTS..” and then HE SNAPPED!”


59 posted on 06/25/2024 10:02:02 AM PDT by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bobbo666

Too bad it’s fake news.


60 posted on 06/25/2024 10:02:07 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-234 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson