Posted on 04/17/2024 6:43:35 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
President Joe Biden, 81, “has no impairment,” Attorney General Merrick Garland claimed in the octogenarian’s defense on Tuesday.
While testifying under oath before a House appropriations subcommittee, Garland said “the president has no impairment” because he “watched” Biden conduct meetings.
About one-third of Democrats doubt Biden’s mental fitness, a Harvard/Harris survey recently found. Another poll revealed 82 percent of Americans harbor concerns about his physical and mental health. Only about one-quarter of voters say Biden is physically or mentally fit to serve a second term, Quinnipiac found. “I have watched him expertly guide meetings of staff and of cabinet members on issues of foreign affairs and military strategy and policy,” he said.
“I have complete confidence in the president,” Garland noted.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
How unexpected. /s
I don’t think his impairment is the issue I think he’s a rotten human being.
Baghdad Bob, meet Metro Merrick.
Put a garland on his head; poison ivy comes to mind.
The Hur was lying?
Then charge him with the STOLEN classified docs ...........................
Great, then you have no excuse for not charging him with stealing classified docs!
Exactly where did Garland get his medical degree?/sarc.
That’s great! Now there’s no excuse not to release the Hur interview!
Well, when you consider Merry’s credibility and the fact Joe Joe signs his paycheck... If it wasn’t for Bidenskyyyyyyyyy, Merry wouldn’t have a job right now. Except for maybe being a Trump analist on CNN and PMSNBC.
Then why is he not being charged with possessing classified documents?
Garland: “Heck, Joe’s as sane as me!”
If Trump doesn’t win this fall, Biden will put this moron on the Supreme Court!
Haha. I was going to post a picture of Baghdad Bob. You beat me to the punch.
The fact that Garland has to publicly deny that Biden may be impaired is significant in itself. Why is a denial even necessary??? It just smacks of damage control.
Both acually
Serial liar ... vouching for a serial liar ...
“We’d like to charge Biden with a crime.”
“You can’t — he’s impaired.”
“Well, if he’s impaired, he shouldn’t be president.”
“But he’s not impaired.”
“Hey, if he’s not impaired, let’s charge him with a crime.”
“You can’t — he’s impaired.”
Bingo.
Well, the Biden administration sure has developed a culture of trust in their statements, totally believable, like Mayorkis insisting the Border is secure ad they have control of it.
“I don’t think his impairment is the issue I think he’s a rotten human being.”
I think it’s both. Although, his impairment is secondary, he really is a vile disgusting human being. I loathe him beyond words.
I’d call him ‘Malevolent Merrick’.
Because he is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.