Did she lie under oath?
Posted on 03/11/2024 5:02:37 PM PDT by McGruff
A House committee investigating the special Jan. 6 committee released a sweeping report Monday that Republicans say demonstrates that four other White House employees did not corroborate key witness Cassidy Hutchinson’s dramatic account of former President Donald Trump's actions that day.
“None of the White House Employees corroborated Hutchinson’s sensational story about President Trump lunging for the steering wheel of the Beast. However, some witnesses did describe the President’s mood after the speech at the Ellipse,” says the 81-page report by the House Administration Committee’s oversight subcommittee, led by Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., a section of which was obtained by NBC News in advance of its release.
Hutchinson testified under oath, privately and publicly, before the Jan. 6 panel that she had heard that Trump had lunged at the steering wheel of the presidential SUV
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
“Undermine”
IOW, correct the stinking pile of lies.
Did she lie under oath?
“...she had heard that Trump had lunged at the steering wheel of the presidential SUV.”
Why hearsay is inadmissible and given NO legal weight in a criminal proceeding.
I love the biased headline. “seeking to undermine.” No, it’s not seeking to, it UNDERMINES the whole narrative.
Jan 6 was a well planned , well coordonated false flag operation conducted by the FBI , the DNC and the DOJ.
This is espionage. Heads should roll.
Some people need to be indicted tried and suffer capital punishment.
Pelosi, Wray, Cheney , Raskin and many others.
The indictments should start of thise who destroyed exhonorative evidence.
“Undermine” the Dem lies with the Truth! Easy Peasy
The only thing being undermined is the house of cards that is the January 6 kangaroo court.
If she can’t be charged criminally she needs to be made unemployable in the federal government. A totally unimpressive BA poli-sci graduate of an unheard-of college cannot be allowed to do this and get away with it.
“” demonstrates that four other White House employees did not corroborate key witness Cassidy Hutchinson’s dramatic account of former President Donald Trump’s actions that day.””
“”Ms. Hutchinson and many other witnesses courageously stepped forward. Yet she now finds herself being questioned by you and your Subcommittee regarding her testimony and on matters that may also be the subject of ongoing criminal proceedings against Mr. Trump,” Jordan wrote to Loudermilk.””
.
How dare actual White House witnesses not corroborate Cassidy’s drama performance over the flimsy excuse of “they were actually there” and saw the entire non-event.
All these non-communists that will say out loud whatever they saw MUST be re-educated regarding the Principals of the Progs so such an obvious attack on the J6 Committee witnesses never reoccurs and uniform agreement of the War On Trump official story has been obtained.
How else will the prog media know what that official story actually is?
Are they supposed to blindly accept the testimony of eyewitnesses?
What are they going to do, print what everyone claims to be the truth?
That’s kinda like 1960s thinking, right?
.
Members of the Jan. 6 committee — led by then-Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and then-Vice Chair Liz Cheney, R-Wyo. — have argued that Trump’s push to subvert the results of the 2020 election and remain in power shows that he is a threat to democracy and the peaceful transfer of power.
Thompson condemned the GOP report in a statement Monday, saying, “Mr. Loudermilk’s latest attack on the Select Committee’s work is dishonest.
That’s rich- a lying racist who headed a lying, dishonest committee calls others dishonest...
The news media hate Trump specifically because he voiced the truth, that they are unaccomplished pinheads who aren’t even good at their relatively simple jobs.
A transparently and grossly biased headline, in the same vein as, "Republican's Pounce"
Sorry, I'm not giving NBC a click with this title, but if the article matches the headline then it is nothing more than another state media propaganda piece that is wholly without credibility.
“seeking to”? Sounds like it does.
Loaded headline.
right - “seeking to undermine” - garbage, propaganda headline.
>> Did she lie under oath?
Were her lips moving when she testified?
I guess CNBC, can't print the truth though, just like the J6 Committee was unable to. Because neither were ever interested in the truth to begin with, and still aren't.
She didn’t say she saw it, just that somebody told her it. Somebody she didn’t name but of course the Democrat media treated it as fact.
Technically, not perjury unless Garland wants to press her on it, which he won’t.
Adam Shifftt laid his load of stinking pile with the Jan. 6 Committee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.